BACKGROUND: Cocaine misuse is a disorder for which no pharmacological treatment of proven efficacy exists. Advances in neurobiology could guide future medication development. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and acceptability of dopamine agonists alone or in combination with any psychosocial intervention for the treatment of of people who misuse cocaine. SEARCH METHODS: We run the search on 12 January 2015. We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group (CDAG) Specialized Register, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ICTRP, clinicaltrials.gov and screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing dopamine agonists alone or associated with psychosocial intervention with placebo, no treatment or other pharmacological interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty four studies, including 2147 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Comparing any dopamine agonist versus placebo, we found no differences for any of the outcomes considered: dropout (moderate quality of evidence), abstinence (low quality of evidence), severity of dependence (low quality of evidence), adverse events (moderate quality of evidence). This was also observed when single dopamine agonists were compared against placebo. Comparing amantadine versus antidepressants, we found low quality of evidence that antidepressants performed better for abstinence (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.53) based on two studies with 44 participants. No differences were found for dropout or adverse events, for both moderate quality of evidence.The major flaws of the included studies concerned selection bias because most studies did not report information about sequence generation (80%) and allocation concealment methods (86%): half of the included studies were judged at unclear risk of performance bias and 62.5% at unclear risk of detection bias for what concerns subjective outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of dopamine agonists for treating cocaine misuse. This absence of evidence may leave to clinicians the alternative of balancing the possible benefits against the potential adverse effects of the treatment. Even the potential benefit of combining a dopamine agonist with a more potent psychosocial intervention, which was suggested by the previous Cochrane Review (Soares 2003), is not supported by the results of this Cochrane Review update.
BACKGROUND:Cocaine misuse is a disorder for which no pharmacological treatment of proven efficacy exists. Advances in neurobiology could guide future medication development. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and acceptability of dopamine agonists alone or in combination with any psychosocial intervention for the treatment of of people who misuse cocaine. SEARCH METHODS: We run the search on 12 January 2015. We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group (CDAG) Specialized Register, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ICTRP, clinicaltrials.gov and screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing dopamine agonists alone or associated with psychosocial intervention with placebo, no treatment or other pharmacological interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty four studies, including 2147 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Comparing any dopamine agonist versus placebo, we found no differences for any of the outcomes considered: dropout (moderate quality of evidence), abstinence (low quality of evidence), severity of dependence (low quality of evidence), adverse events (moderate quality of evidence). This was also observed when single dopamine agonists were compared against placebo. Comparing amantadine versus antidepressants, we found low quality of evidence that antidepressants performed better for abstinence (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.53) based on two studies with 44 participants. No differences were found for dropout or adverse events, for both moderate quality of evidence.The major flaws of the included studies concerned selection bias because most studies did not report information about sequence generation (80%) and allocation concealment methods (86%): half of the included studies were judged at unclear risk of performance bias and 62.5% at unclear risk of detection bias for what concerns subjective outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of dopamine agonists for treating cocaine misuse. This absence of evidence may leave to clinicians the alternative of balancing the possible benefits against the potential adverse effects of the treatment. Even the potential benefit of combining a dopamine agonist with a more potent psychosocial intervention, which was suggested by the previous Cochrane Review (Soares 2003), is not supported by the results of this Cochrane Review update.
Authors: Bankole A Johnson; John D Roache; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Martin A Javors; Joseph M Harrison; Ahmed Elkashef; Jurij Mojsiak; Shou-Hua Li; Daniel A Bloch Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kyle M Kampman; Deborah Leiderman; Tyson Holmes; Joseph LoCastro; Daniel A Bloch; Malcolm S Reid; Steve Shoptaw; Margaret A Montgomery; Theresa M Winhusen; Eugene C Somoza; Domenic A Ciraulo; Ahmed Elkashef; Frank Vocci Journal: Addiction Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Susanne Rösner; Andrea Hackl-Herrwerth; Stefan Leucht; Philippe Lehert; Simona Vecchi; Michael Soyka Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-09-08
Authors: Melis Odabas-Geldiay; Hannah Shields; Lais F Berro; Kenner C Rice; Leonard L Howell Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Morgane Thomsen; Andrew C Barrett; Paul Butler; S Stevens Negus; S Barak Caine Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Frances R Levin; John J Mariani; Martina Pavlicova; C Jean Choi; Amy L Mahony; Daniel J Brooks; Adam Bisaga; Elias Dakwar; Kenneth M Carpenter; Nasir Naqvi; Edward V Nunes; Kyle Kampman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Patrick D Worhunsky; David Matuskey; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Edward C Gaiser; Nabeel Nabulsi; Gustavo A Angarita; Vince D Calhoun; Robert T Malison; Marc N Potenza; Richard E Carson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kevin G Lynch; Jennifer Plebani; Kelly Spratt; Mark Morales; Mila Tamminga; Philip Feibush; Kyle M Kampman Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2022 Mar-Apr 01 Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Noelle C Anastasio; Dennis J Sholler; Robert G Fox; Sonja J Stutz; Christina R Merritt; James M Bjork; F Gerard Moeller; Kathryn A Cunningham Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Michael Farrell; Natasha K Martin; Emily Stockings; Annick Bórquez; Javier A Cepeda; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Ali; Lucy Thi Tran; Jürgen Rehm; Marta Torrens; Steve Shoptaw; Rebecca McKetin Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 79.321