| Literature DB >> 26014301 |
Mohammad Shawkat Ali1, Pritesh Ranjan Dash2, Mahmuda Nasrin3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kaempferia galanga is an important medicinal plant and has been traditionally used to help restlessness, stress, anxiety, depression etc. in tropics and subtropics of Asia including Bangladesh, India, China, Japan and Indochina. Literature survey revealed that there are very less reports on neuropharmacological activity of this plant. Therefore, the present study investigated the sedative activity of different extracts of rhizome and leaf of Kaempferia galanga.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26014301 PMCID: PMC4443623 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0670-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Effect of different extracts of Kaempferia galanga on thiopental sodium induced sleeping time test in mice
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Onset of Sleep (minutes) | Duration of Sleep (minutes) | Percent effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 ml/kg | 2.06 ± 0.64 | 66.33 ± 8.04 | 100 |
| Diazepam | 2 | 1.36 ± 0.06 | 153.5 ± 11.53** | 231.42 |
| ACR | 100 | 1.83 ± 0.38 | 83.33 ± 2.36 | 125.63 |
| 200 | 1.67 ± 0.12 | 183.5 ± 21.40** | 276.65 | |
| PEF | 100 | 1.77 ± 0.18 | 105 ± 6.99 | 158.29 |
| 200 | 1.89 ± 0.43 | 164.17 ± 17.61** | 247.50 | |
| CHF | 100 | 1.87 ± 0..25 | 97.67 ± 20.08 | 147.25 |
| 200 | 1.28 ± 0.22 | 237.83 ± 8.09** | 358.55 | |
| MEF | 100 | 1.92 ± 0.23 | 95.17 ± 16.25 | 143.48 |
| 200 | 1.51 ± 0.13 | 176.83 ± 24.57** | 266.59 | |
| ACL | 100 | 1.91 ± 0.24 | 69.5 ± 4.09 | 104.78 |
| 200 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 113.5 ± 15.65* | 171.11 |
Control group received water 5 ml/kg (p.o), standard group received Diazepam 2 mg/kg body weight (i.p.), test groups ACR, PEF, CHF, MEF and ACL were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight of the extracts (p.o.) respectively. Values are mean ± SEM, (n = 6); * p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, Dunnett t-test as compared to control. ACR = Acetone extract of rhizome, PEF = Petroleum ether fraction of rhizome, CHF = Chloroform fraction of rhizome, MEF = Methanol fraction of rhizome and ACL = Acetone extract of leaf
Effect of different extracts of Kaempferia galanga on hole cross test in mice
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Number of movements (% of Number of movements inhibition) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | 120 min | ||
| Control | 5 ml/kg | 15.5 ± 1.84 | 14.33 ± 2.18 | 13.67 ± 1.83 | 10.5 ± 1.03 | 10 ± 1.41 |
| Diazepam | 2 | 15 ± 1.09 | 7.34 ± 0.76 ( | 4.67 ± 0.61** ( | 3.83 ± 0.75** ( | 2.83 ± 0.59** ( |
| ACR | 100 | 7.5 ± 2.36 | 2.83 ± 1.01** ( | 2.33 ± 0.76** ( | 1.83 ± 0.47** ( | 3.33 ± 1.31* ( |
| 200 | 9.67 ± 1.76 | 1.83 ± 0.31** ( | 0.83 ± 0.31** ( | 1.5 ± 0.43** ( | 1.67 ± 0.88** ( | |
| PEF | 100 | 11.33 ± 2.47 | 1.17 ± 0.31** ( | 1.17 ± 0.40** ( | 2 ± 0.82** ( | 2.5 ± 1.05** ( |
| 200 | 8 ± 1.31 | 1 ± 0.26** ( | 0.83 ± 0.47** ( | 1.67 ± 0.61** ( | 1.17 ± 0.60** ( | |
| CHF | 100 | 10.83 ± 0.65 | 4.83 ± 3.26* ( | 2.5 ± 1.70** ( | 3.67 ± 0.84** ( | 2.17 ± 0.60** ( |
| 200 | 11.17 ± 3.09 | 4.5 ± 1.41* ( | 1.83 ± 1.07** ( | 1.5 ± 0.95** ( | 0.67 ± 0.33** ( | |
| MEF | 100 | 8 ± 1.41 | 5.67 ± 2.82* ( | 2 ± 1.06** ( | 1.33 ± 0.71** ( | 1.67 ± 0.61** ( |
| 200 | 11 ± 1.21 | 2.83 ± 1.19* ( | 1.83 ± 0.54** ( | 1.33 ± 0.49** ( | 1.5 ± 0.50** ( | |
| ACL | 100 | 9.67 ± 1.99 | 2.5 ± 0.72** ( | 2.67 ± 0.95** ( | 2.5 ± 0.67** ( | 1.83 ± 4.00** ( |
| 200 | 6.83 ± 2.01 | 1.33 ± 0.95** ( | 0.67 ± 0.49** ( | 1 ± 0.52** ( | 0.5 ± 0.34** ( | |
Control group received water 5 ml/kg body weight (p.o.), standard group received Diazepam 2 mg/kg body weight (i.p.), test groups ACR, PEF, CHF, MEF and ACL were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight of the extracts (p.o.) respectively. Values are mean ± SEM, (n = 6); * p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, Dunnett t-test as compared to control. ACR = Acetone extract of rhizome, PEF = Petroleum ether fraction of rhizome, CHF = Chloroform fraction of rhizome, MEF = Methanol fraction of rhizome and ACL = Acetone extract of leaf
Effect of different extracts of Kaempferia galanga on open field test in mice
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Number of movements (% of Number of movements inhibition) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | 120 min | ||
| Control | 5 ml/kg | 112.83 ± 6.24 | 112.5 ± 5.67 | 103.33 ± 11.39 | 99 ± 3.95 | 90.67 ± 1.52 |
| Diazepam | 2 | 113 ± 2.62 | 57.83 ± 9.68* ( | 46.67 ± 11.28* ( | 37.83 ± 11.67** ( | 26.67 ± 14.33** ( |
| ACR | 100 | 64.83 ± 17.24 | 25.17 ± 12.4** ( | 18 ± 4.76** ( | 23.67 ± 7.54** ( | 27 ± 6.76** ( |
| 200 | 91 ± 8.97 | 15.17 ± 4.73** ( | 6.5 ± 2.38** ( | 10.83 ± 3.58** ( | 10.83 ± 3.98** ( | |
| PEF | 100 | 70.17 ± 11.86 | 14 ± 7.06** ( | 12.17 ± 4.46** ( | 11 ± 4.26** ( | 17.33 ± 4.94** ( |
| 200 | 86.67 ± 11.14 | 13.83 ± 7.89** ( | 9.5 ± 1.38** ( | 9 ± 3.03** ( | 6.5 ± 3.04** ( | |
| CHF | 100 | 90 ± 7.19 |
| 24.33 ± 9.36** ( | 25.83 ± 5.28** ( | 15.33 ± 5.94** ( |
| 200 | 104.83 ± 8.18 | 12 ± 4.84** ( | 11.67 ± 6.51** ( | 11.67 ± 6.02** ( | 13.83 ± 6.99** ( | |
| MEF | 100 | 84.17 ± 12.54 | 32.67 ± 17.79* ( | 21.33 ± 11.97** ( | 13.17 ± 3.50** ( | 10.83 ± 7.06** ( |
| 200 | 90.83 ± 16.28 | 19.83 ± 7.66** ( | 12 ± 3.71** ( | 10.33 ± 3.67** ( | 10.83 ± 3.98** ( | |
| ACL | 100 | 71.83 ± 22.56 | 44.83 ± 18.22* ( | 26.83 ± 18.57** ( | 11.33 ± 10.73** ( | 6.33 ± 6.32** ( |
| 200 | 79.67 ± 11.34 | 31 ± 11.12* ( | 16.17 ± 3.49** ( | 6 ± 0.77** ( | 4 ± 1.26** ( | |
Control group received water 5 ml/kg body weight (p.o.), standard group received Diazepam 2 mg/kg body weight (i.p.), test groups ACR, PEF, CHF, MEF and ACL were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight of the extracts (p.o.) respectively. Values are mean ± SEM, (n = 6); * p < 0.05, **p < 0.001, Dunnett t-test as compared to control. ACR = Acetone extract of rhizome, PEF = Petroleum ether fraction of rhizome, CHF = Chloroform fraction of rhizome, MEF = Methanol fraction of rhizome and ACL = Acetone extract of leaf.