Literature DB >> 26013964

Factors affecting levels of circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and their implications for noninvasive prenatal testing.

Sarah L Kinnings1, Jennifer A Geis1, Eyad Almasri1, Huiquan Wang1, Xiaojun Guan1, Ron M McCullough1, Allan T Bombard2, Juan-Sebastian Saldivar1, Paul Oeth1, Cosmin Deciu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sufficient fetal DNA in a maternal plasma sample is required for accurate aneuploidy detection via noninvasive prenatal testing, thus highlighting a need to understand the factors affecting fetal fraction.
METHOD: The MaterniT21™ PLUS test uses massively parallel sequencing to analyze cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and detect chromosomal abnormalities. We assess the impact of a variety of factors, both maternal and fetal, on the fetal fraction across a large number of samples processed by Sequenom Laboratories.
RESULTS: The rate of increase in fetal fraction with increasing gestational age varies across the duration of the testing period and is also influenced by fetal aneuploidy status. Maternal weight trends inversely with fetal fraction, and we find no added benefit from analyzing body mass index or blood volume instead of weight. Strong correlations exist between fetal fractions from aliquots taken from the same patient at the same blood draw and also at different blood draws.
CONCLUSION: While a number of factors trend with fetal fraction across the cohort as a whole, they are not the sole determinants of fetal fraction. In this study, the variability for any one patient does not appear large enough to justify postponing testing to a later gestational age.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013964     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  22 in total

1.  Sequencing of short cfDNA fragments in NIPT improves fetal fraction with higher maternal BMI and early gestational age.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Qin Zhang; Yuting Liang; Ang Gao; Yang Ding; Nannan Zhao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA - New implications for maternal health.

Authors:  Lisa Hui
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2016-06-07

Review 3.  Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Dallas Reed; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Chromosomal phase improves aneuploidy detection in non-invasive prenatal testing at low fetal DNA fractions.

Authors:  Giulio Genovese; Curtis J Mello; Po-Ru Loh; Robert E Handsaker; Seva Kashin; Christopher W Whelan; Lucy A Bayer-Zwirello; Steven A McCarroll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Low Fetal Fraction of Cell Free DNA at Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening Increases the Subsequent Risk of Preterm Birth in Uncomplicated Singleton Pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiaosong Yuan; Xiaoya Han; Chenbo Jia; Wenbo Zhou; Bin Yu
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-13

6.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

7.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Anthony R Gregg; Brian G Skotko; Judith L Benkendorf; Kristin G Monaghan; Komal Bajaj; Robert G Best; Susan Klugman; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Low fetal fraction in obese women at first trimester cell-free DNA based prenatal screening is not accompanied by differences in total cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Teodora R Kolarova; Hayley J MacKinnon; Jaclynne M Hedge; Elena Vinopal; Kimberly K Ma; Christina M Lockwood; Suchitra Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.242

9.  Noninvasive prenatal exome sequencing diagnostic utility limited by sequencing depth and fetal fraction.

Authors:  Dayne L Filer; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Alicia Brandt; Kelly L Gilmore; Bradford C Powell; Jonathan S Berg; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.242

10.  Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Scheffer; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Ellis C Becking; Marjan M Weiss; Caroline J Bax; Dick Oepkes; Erik A Sistermans; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.