Literature DB >> 2601319

Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients.

R S Tyler1, B C Moore, F K Kuk.   

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to provide an independent corroboration of open-set word recognition in some of the better cochlear-implant patients. These included the Chorimac, Nucleus (one group from the U.S.A. and one group from Hannover, Germany), Symbion, Duren/Cologne and 3M/Vienna implants. Three experiments are reported: (1) word recognition in word lists and in sentences; (2) environmental sound perception, and (3) gap detection. On word recognition, the scores of 6 Chorimac patients averaged 2.5% words and 0.7% words in sentences correct in the French tests. In the German tests, the scores averaged 17% words and 10% words in sentences for 10 Duren/Cologne patients, 15% words and 16% words in sentences for 9 3M/Vienna patients, and 10% words and 16% words in sentences (3% to 26%) for 10 Nucleus/Hannover patients. In the English tests, the scores averaged 11% words and 29.6% words in sentences for 10 Nucleus-U.S.A. patients, and 13.7% words and 35.7% words in sentences for the 9 Symbion patients. The ability to recognize recorded environmental sounds was measured with a closed set of 18 sounds. Performance averaged 23% correct for Chorimac patients, 41% correct for 3M/Vienna patients, 44% correct for Nucleus/Hannover patients, 21% correct for Duren/Cologne patients, 58% correct for Nucleus/U.S.A. patients, and 83% correct for Symbion patients. A multidimensional scaling analysis suggested that patients were, in part, utilizing information about the envelope and about the periodic/aperiodic nature of some of the sounds. Gap detection thresholds with a one-octave wide noise centered at 500 Hz varied widely among patients. Typically, patients with gap thresholds less than 40 ms showed a wide range of performance on speech perception tasks, whereas patients with gap-detection thresholds greater than 40 ms showed poor word recognition skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2601319     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3204.887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  15 in total

1.  Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  Ted A Meyer; Stefan A Frisch; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao; Xin Jin; Xiaowei Chen; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Sejal Kuvadia; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A model of myelinated nerve fibres for electrical prosthesis design.

Authors:  J H Frijns; J H ten Kate
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI).

Authors:  Min-Yu Cheng; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Dean Mancuso
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Brian Gygi; Kim Thien N Ho
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-12

8.  Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Brian Gygi; Min-Yu Cheng; Jay Vachhani; Megan Mulvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chelsea Blankenship; Fawen Zhang; Robert Keith
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Adults with cochlear implants can use prosody to determine the clausal structure of spoken sentences.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Jonathan Neukam; Alexander J Kinney; Nicole Capach; Samantha U March; Mario A Svirsky; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.