Literature DB >> 26010995

Adolescent development of inhibition as a function of SES and gender: Converging evidence from behavior and fMRI.

Jeffrey M Spielberg1,2, Ezequiel M Galarce3, Cecile D Ladouceur4, Dana L McMakin4, Thomas M Olino4,5, Erika E Forbes4, Jennifer S Silk4, Neal D Ryan4, Ronald E Dahl6.   

Abstract

The ability to adaptively inhibit responses to tempting/distracting stimuli in the pursuit of goals is an essential set of skills necessary for adult competence and wellbeing. These inhibitory capacities develop throughout childhood, with growing evidence of important maturational changes occurring in adolescence. There also has been intense interest in the role of social adversity on the development of executive function, including inhibitory control. We hypothesized that the onset of adolescence could be a time of particular opportunity/vulnerability in the development of inhibition due to the large degree of maturational changes in neural systems involved in regulatory control. We investigated this hypothesis in a longitudinal study of adolescents by examining the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the maturation of inhibition and concurrent brain function. Furthermore, we examined gender as a potential moderator of this relationship, given evidence of gender-specificity in the developmental pathways of inhibition as well as sex differences in adolescent development. Results reveal that lower SES is associated with worse behavioral inhibition over time and a concurrent increase in anterior cingulate (ACC) activation, but only in girls. We also found that lower SES girls exhibited decreased ACC ↔ dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) coupling over time. Our findings suggest that female adolescents with lower SES appear to develop less efficient inhibitory processing in dlPFC, requiring greater and relatively unsuccessful compensatory recruitment of ACC. In summary, the present study provides a novel window into the neural mechanisms by which the influence of SES on inhibition may be transmitted during adolescence.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescence; anterior cingulate cortex; connectivity; development; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; inhibition; longitudinal; socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26010995      PMCID: PMC4513362          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  30 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Childhood risk categories for adolescent substance involvement: a general liability typology.

Authors:  Duncan B Clark; Jack R Cornelius; Levent Kirisci; Ralph E Tarter
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood.

Authors:  Inge-Marie Eigsti; Vivian Zayas; Walter Mischel; Yuichi Shoda; Ozlem Ayduk; Mamta B Dadlani; Matthew C Davidson; J Lawrence Aber; B J Casey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

4.  Childhood poverty: specific associations with neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; David M Shera; Jessica H Savage; Laura Betancourt; Joan M Giannetta; Nancy L Brodsky; Elsa K Malmud; Hallam Hurt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Neurodevelopmental changes in working memory and cognitive control.

Authors:  Silvia A Bunge; Samantha B Wright
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Coming of age too early: pubertal influences on girls' vulnerability to psychological distress.

Authors:  X Ge; R D Conger; G H Elder
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1996-12

Review 7.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development.

Authors:  V C McLoyd
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1998-02

8.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.

Authors:  Matthew C Davidson; Dima Amso; Loren Cruess Anderson; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms.

Authors:  D F Bjorklund; K Kipp
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 10.  The obesity epidemic in the United States--gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Youfa Wang; May A Beydoun
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  16 in total

1.  Longitudinal pathways linking family risk, neural risk processing, delay discounting, and adolescent substance use.

Authors:  Jungmeen Kim-Spoon; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Kristin Peviani; Alexis Brieant; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Warren K Bickel; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 8.982

2.  Unpredictability increases the error-related negativity in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Brittany C Speed; Felicia Jackson; Brady D Nelson; Zachary P Infantolino; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Adolescent sex differences in cortico-subcortical functional connectivity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Yu Sun Chung; Vince Calhoun; Michael C Stevens
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Brain Development Includes Linear and Multiple Nonlinear Trajectories: A Cross-Sectional Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Ashkan Faghiri; Julia M Stephen; Yu-Ping Wang; Tony W Wilson; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2019-12

5.  Orbitofrontal cortex connectivity as a mechanism of adolescent behavior change.

Authors:  Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Tammy Chung; Justin D Caouette; Arielle Ketcherside; Karen A Hudson; Francesca M Filbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Effects of age, sex, and puberty on neural efficiency of cognitive and motor control in adolescents.

Authors:  Tilman Schulte; Jui-Yang Hong; Edith V Sullivan; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Fiona C Baker; Weiwei Chu; Devin Prouty; Dongjin Kwon; Mary J Meloy; Ty Brumback; Susan F Tapert; Ian M Colrain; Eva M Müller-Oehring
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Differential Associations of Adversity Profiles with Adolescent Cognitive Control and Psychopathology.

Authors:  Alexis Brieant; Claudia Clinchard; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Jacob Lee; Brooks King-Casas; Jungmeen Kim-Spoon
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2022-09-15

8.  Neural Markers of the Development of Executive Function: Relevance for Education.

Authors:  Sheila Shanmugan; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-08

9.  Socioeconomic disparities in academic achievement: A multi-modal investigation of neural mechanisms in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Maya L Rosen; Margaret A Sheridan; Kelly A Sambrook; Andrew N Meltzoff; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Socioeconomic Risk for Adolescent Cognitive Control and Emerging Risk-Taking Behaviors.

Authors:  Alexis Brieant; Kristin M Peviani; Jacob E Lee; Brooks King-Casas; Jungmeen Kim-Spoon
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2020-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.