Literature DB >> 26010612

Wireless Ultrasound Guidance for Femoral Venous Cannulation in Electrophysiology: Impact on Safety, Efficacy, and Procedural Delay.

Daniel Rodríguez Muñoz1, Eduardo Franco Díez1, Javier Moreno1, Giuseppe Lumia1, Alejandra Carbonell San Román1, Teresa Segura De La Cal1, Roberto Matía Francés1, Antonio Hernández Madrid1, José Luis Zamorano Gómez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guidance increases safety and efficacy in vascular cannulation and is considered the standard of care. However, barriers including workflow interference and the need to be assisted by a second operator limit its adoption in clinical routine. The use of wireless US (WUS) may overcome these barriers. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a novel WUS probe during its initial implantation in an electrophysiology (EP) laboratory.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients requiring femoral venous cannulation for EP procedures were included in this single center, prospective, observational study, comparing WUS guidance with the anatomical landmark approach. The primary endpoint was time to successful cannulation. Secondary endpoints included rate of unsuccessful punctures, accidental arterial punctures, and workflow interference.
RESULTS: Compared with anatomical landmark approach, WUS guidance significantly reduced mean time to successful cannulation (87.3 ± 94.3 vs 238.1 ± 294.7 seconds, P < 0.01). Workflow interference was predominantly nonexistent or mild and decreased after the first three weeks of use. In addition, WUS guidance improved safety and efficacy, reducing the rate of accidental arterial punctures (0.02 ± 0.1 vs 0.25 ± 0.5 arterial punctures per cannulation, P < 0.05) and unsuccessful attempts (0.26 ± 0.8 vs 1.75 ± 2.1 attempts per cannulation, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: WUS guidance resulted in faster, safer, and more effective femoral venous cannulation than the anatomical landmark approach without adding significant workflow interference. The application of wireless technology in this setting contributed to overcoming some of the barriers preventing a more widespread clinical use of US guidance.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cannulation; electrophysiology; femoral vein; wireless ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26010612     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  8 in total

1.  Ultrasound guided vascular access in the electrophysiology lab: should it be a standard of care?

Authors:  Christine C Tanaka-Esposito; Patrick Tchou
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  How to achieve ultrasound-guided femoral venous access: the new standard of care in the electrophysiology laboratory.

Authors:  Benedict M Wiles; Nicholas Child; Paul R Roberts
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Transseptal Left Atrial Access to Improve Safety in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Rahel Zuercher; Anique Herling; Marc T Schmidt; Marta Bachmann; Stephan Winnik; Firat Duru; Urs Eriksson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Predictors of Successful Ultrasound Guided Femoral Vein Cannulation in Electrophysiological Procedures.

Authors:  Francesco De Sensi; Gennaro Miracapillo; Luigi Addonisio; Marco Breschi; Marco Scalese; Alberto Cresti; Francesco Paneni; Ugo Limbruno
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-10-31

5.  Accuracy and performance of a new handheld ultrasound machine with wireless system.

Authors:  Enrico Maria Zardi; Edoardo Franceschetti; Chiara Giorgi; Alessio Palumbo; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided vs conventional vascular access for cardiac electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Tom Kai Ming Wang; Michael Tzu Min Wang; Andrew Martin
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-09-16

Review 7.  Ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-guided vascular access in cardiac electrophysiology procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Christos D Karkos; Nikolaos Fragakis; Antonios P Antoniadis; Magdalini Meletidou; Vassilios Vassilikos
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022-02-07

8.  Eyes-hands alignment during regional anesthesia procedures: The US support.

Authors:  Alessandro Strumia; Fabio Costa; Giuseppe Pascarella; Felice Eugenio Agrò
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.