Literature DB >> 26010588

Incidental auditory category learning.

Yafit Gabay1, Frederic K Dick2, Jason D Zevin3, Lori L Holt1.   

Abstract

Very little is known about how auditory categories are learned incidentally, without instructions to search for category-diagnostic dimensions, overt category decisions, or experimenter-provided feedback. This is an important gap because learning in the natural environment does not arise from explicit feedback and there is evidence that the learning systems engaged by traditional tasks are distinct from those recruited by incidental category learning. We examined incidental auditory category learning with a novel paradigm, the Systematic Multimodal Associations Reaction Time (SMART) task, in which participants rapidly detect and report the appearance of a visual target in 1 of 4 possible screen locations. Although the overt task is rapid visual detection, a brief sequence of sounds precedes each visual target. These sounds are drawn from 1 of 4 distinct sound categories that predict the location of the upcoming visual target. These many-to-one auditory-to-visuomotor correspondences support incidental auditory category learning. Participants incidentally learn categories of complex acoustic exemplars and generalize this learning to novel exemplars and tasks. Further, learning is facilitated when category exemplar variability is more tightly coupled to the visuomotor associations than when the same stimulus variability is experienced across trials. We relate these findings to phonetic category learning. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26010588      PMCID: PMC4516559          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  42 in total

1.  Perceptual learning without perception.

Authors:  T Watanabe; J E Náñez; Y Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  What are the computations of the cerebellum, the basal ganglia and the cerebral cortex?

Authors:  K Doya
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1999-10

3.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Valerie Hazan; Kerry Bannister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Two cases requiring external reinforcement in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Jose E Nanez; Steve Holloway; Yoshiaki Tsushima; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production.

Authors:  B Lindblom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Athanassios Protopapas; Yoshiaki Tsushima; Eleni L Vlahou; Simone Gori; Stephen Grossberg; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-25

7.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The phenomenon of task-irrelevant perceptual learning.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Discovering functional units in continuous speech.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Francisco Lacerda; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Is statistical learning constrained by lower level perceptual organization?

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson; Ran Liu; Jason D Zevin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-04-22
View more
  7 in total

1.  Ready to Learn: Incidental Exposure Fosters Category Learning.

Authors:  Layla Unger; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Incidental learning of sound categories is impaired in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Yafit Gabay; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Task and distribution sampling affect auditory category learning.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Perceived similarity ratings predict generalization success after traditional category learning and a new paired-associate learning task.

Authors:  Stefania R Ashby; Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

5.  The perceptual learning of time-compressed speech: A comparison of training protocols with different levels of difficulty.

Authors:  Yafit Gabay; Avi Karni; Karen Banai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Incidental learning in a multisensory environment across childhood.

Authors:  Hannah J Broadbent; Hayley White; Denis Mareschal; Natasha Z Kirkham
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-04-26

7.  Learning to decipher time-compressed speech: Robust acquisition with a slight difficulty in generalization among young adults with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Yafit Gabay; Avi Karni; Karen Banai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.