Literature DB >> 12662639

What are the computations of the cerebellum, the basal ganglia and the cerebral cortex?

K Doya1.   

Abstract

The classical notion that the cerebellum and the basal ganglia are dedicated to motor control is under dispute given increasing evidence of their involvement in non-motor functions. Is it then impossible to characterize the functions of the cerebellum, the basal ganglia and the cerebral cortex in a simplistic manner? This paper presents a novel view that their computational roles can be characterized not by asking what are the "goals" of their computation, such as motor or sensory, but by asking what are the "methods" of their computation, specifically, their learning algorithms. There is currently enough anatomical, physiological, and theoretical evidence to support the hypotheses that the cerebellum is a specialized organism for supervised learning, the basal ganglia are for reinforcement learning, and the cerebral cortex is for unsupervised learning.This paper investigates how the learning modules specialized for these three kinds of learning can be assembled into goal-oriented behaving systems. In general, supervised learning modules in the cerebellum can be utilized as "internal models" of the environment. Reinforcement learning modules in the basal ganglia enable action selection by an "evaluation" of environmental states. Unsupervised learning modules in the cerebral cortex can provide statistically efficient representation of the states of the environment and the behaving system. Two basic action selection architectures are shown, namely, reactive action selection and predictive action selection. They can be implemented within the anatomical constraint of the network linking these structures. Furthermore, the use of the cerebellar supervised learning modules for state estimation, behavioral simulation, and encapsulation of learned skill is considered. Finally, the usefulness of such theoretical frameworks in interpreting brain imaging data is demonstrated in the paradigm of procedural learning.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 12662639     DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(99)00046-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  164 in total

Review 1.  Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A biophysically-based neuromorphic model of spike rate- and timing-dependent plasticity.

Authors:  Guy Rachmuth; Harel Z Shouval; Mark F Bear; Chi-Sang Poon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  From movement to thought: executive function, embodied cognition, and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Ely Budding; Dana Chidekel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Adaptation, expertise, and giftedness: towards an understanding of cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar network contributions.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Ely Budding; Dana Chidekel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Abstract Context Representations in Primate Amygdala and Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  A Saez; M Rigotti; S Ostojic; S Fusi; C D Salzman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Defective cerebellar control of cortical plasticity in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Cecile Hubsch; Emmanuel Roze; Traian Popa; Margherita Russo; Ammu Balachandran; Salini Pradeep; Florian Mueller; Vanessa Brochard; Angelo Quartarone; Bertrand Degos; Marie Vidailhet; Asha Kishore; Sabine Meunier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 8.  Neurocognitive basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to language processing.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.

Authors:  Sara M Constantino; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Control of aperture closure initiation during reach-to-grasp movements under manipulations of visual feedback and trunk involvement in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Miya Kato Rand; Martin Lemay; Linda M Squire; Yury P Shimansky; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.