Kevin Riley1, Craig Slatin2, Carol Rice3, Mitchel Rosen4, B Louise Weidner4, Jane Fleishman5, Linda Alerding3, Linda Delp1. 1. UCLA Labor Occupational Safety and Health Program, Los Angeles, California. 2. Department of Community Health and Sustainability, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4. Office of Public Health Practice, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey. 5. The New England Consortium, Lowell, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Worker training is a core component of the OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) standard, but few studies have considered what motivates managers to provide HAZWOPER training to employees or what they value in that training. METHODS: In 2012, four university-based programs conducted an exploratory survey of managers who sent employees to HAZWOPER courses. Results from 109 respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of respondents cited regulations as the most important reason to provide HAZWOPER training; many indicated they would provide less training if there were no standard in place. Three-quarters (74%) reported training had improved workplace conditions. Fewer than half said they were likely to involve trained employees in aspects of the organization's H&S program. DISCUSSION: Compliance with regulatory requirements is an important factor shaping managers' training delivery decisions. Managers recognize positive impacts of training. These impacts could be enhanced by further leveraging employee H&S knowledge and skills.
BACKGROUND: Worker training is a core component of the OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) standard, but few studies have considered what motivates managers to provide HAZWOPER training to employees or what they value in that training. METHODS: In 2012, four university-based programs conducted an exploratory survey of managers who sent employees to HAZWOPER courses. Results from 109 respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of respondents cited regulations as the most important reason to provide HAZWOPER training; many indicated they would provide less training if there were no standard in place. Three-quarters (74%) reported training had improved workplace conditions. Fewer than half said they were likely to involve trained employees in aspects of the organization's H&S program. DISCUSSION: Compliance with regulatory requirements is an important factor shaping managers' training delivery decisions. Managers recognize positive impacts of training. These impacts could be enhanced by further leveraging employee H&S knowledge and skills.
Authors: Lynda S Robson; Carol M Stephenson; Paul A Schulte; Benjamin C Amick; Emma L Irvin; Donald E Eggerth; Stella Chan; Amber R Bielecky; Anna M Wang; Terri L Heidotting; Robert H Peters; Judith A Clarke; Kimberley Cullen; Cathy J Rotunda; Paula L Grubb Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Michael J Burke; Sue Ann Sarpy; Kristin Smith-Crowe; Suzanne Chan-Serafin; Rommel O Salvador; Gazi Islam Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-12-27 Impact factor: 9.308