Literature DB >> 26009921

Mandibular bone block harvesting from the retromolar region: a 10-year prospective clinical study.

Fouad Khoury, Thomas Hanser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of bone block harvesting from the external oblique ridge with the MicroSaw, assess the volume of the harvested block, and identify possible morbidity and complications related to the procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone blocks were harvested from the external oblique line of the mandible according to the MicroSaw protocol. The bone blocks were split into two thinner blocks with a diamond disk according to the split bone block (SBB) technique for biologic grafting procedures.
RESULTS: In all, 3,874 bone blocks were harvested from the external oblique line of the mandible in 3,328 patients. Four hundred nineteen patients (12.59%) underwent bilateral bone block harvesting, and 127 patients (3.82%) had more than one block harvested from the same area during the study period. In 431 cases (11.12%), only one block was required, so the second was repositioned to reconstruct its donor site. The average harvesting time was 6.5 ± 2.5 minutes, and a mean volume of 1.9 ± 0.9 cm³ was obtained (maximum 4.4 cm³). In 168 (4.33%) cases, the alveolar nerve was exposed, leading to sensory problems lasting up to 6 months. In 20 cases (0.5%), minor nerve injury resulted in hypesthesia or paresthesia that lasted for up to 1 year in most patients. No major nerve lesions with permanent anesthesia were observed. Sixty-one (1.58%) donor sites showed primary healing complications, most in smokers (80.4%). Reentry of 16 reimplanted harvested areas was performed between 6 and 40 months later, showing a well-regenerated and healed external oblique ridge.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that relatively large volumes of bone block graft can be retrieved in the mandible with a low complication rate. Reimplantation of half of the bone block offers the possibility for complete regeneration of the donor site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26009921     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  17 in total

1.  Anxiety and pain perception in patients undergoing mandibular autogenous block bone surgery.

Authors:  Luiz-Felipe-Silva Novy; Evandro-Guimarães Aguiar; José-Alcides-Almeida de Arruda; Allyson-Nogueira Moreira; Emerson-Gomes Dos Santos; Cláudia-Silami de Magalhães; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Comparison of the 3D-Microstructure Between Alveolar and Iliac Bone for Enhanced Bioinspired Bone Graft Substitutes.

Authors:  Rene Rothweiler; Christian Gross; Emely Bortel; Sarah Früh; Javier Gerber; Elodie Boller; Jonas Wüster; Andres Stricker; Tobias Fretwurst; Gerhard Iglhaut; Susanne Nahles; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Bernhard Hesse; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Two bone blocks sandwich technique for horizontal reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridge in anterior maxilla: A case report.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Xia; Yu-Feng Zhang; Bin Shi; Min Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  The three-dimensional reconstruction of the jaw with "bone slat technique" in conjunction with third molar removal.

Authors:  Mario Santagata; Atirge Cecere; Rosario V E Prisco; Gianpaolo Tartaro; Salvatore D'Amato
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2018-03-08

5.  Internal oblique line implants in severe mandibular atrophies.

Authors:  Argimiro Hernández-Suarez; Luis-Guillermo Oliveros-López; María-Ángeles Serrera-Figallo; Celia Vázquez-Pachón; Daniel Torres-Lagares; José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  Clinical results of autologous bone augmentation harvested from the mandibular ramus prior to implant placement. An analysis of 104 cases.

Authors:  Andreas Sakkas; Konstantinidis Ioannis; Karsten Winter; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2016-10-06

7.  A Suggested Approach of Managing Excessive Maxillary Gingival Display in Terminal Dentition.

Authors:  Daniel Saad; Celine Moukarzel; Naim El Haddad; Anthony Rizk
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects-A 12-month retrospective radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Frank R Kloss; Vincent Offermanns; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation procedure using subperiosteal tunneling technique: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ashish Kakar; Kanupriya Kakar; Bappanadu H Sripathi Rao; Annette Lindner; Heiner Nagursky; Gaurav Jain; Aditya Patney
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02-25

10.  Donor-site Morbidity after Retromolar Bone Harvesting Using a Standardised Press Fit Cylinder Protocol.

Authors:  Philipp Streckbein; Mathias Meier; Christopher Kähling; Jan-Falco Wilbrand; Tobias Langguth; Heidrun Schaaf; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Roland Streckbein; Sameh Attia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.