Literature DB >> 26009500

Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control.

Ross A Clark1, Yong-Hao Pua2, Cristino C Oliveira3, Kelly J Bower3, Shamala Thilarajah4, Rebekah McGaw3, Ksaniel Hasanki3, Benjamin F Mentiplay3.   

Abstract

The Microsoft Kinect V2 for Windows, also known as the Xbox One Kinect, includes new and potentially far improved depth and image sensors which may increase its accuracy for assessing postural control and balance. The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and reliability of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based three dimensional motion analysis (3DMA) system and the Kinect V2 during a variety of static and dynamic balance assessments. Thirty healthy adults performed two sessions, separated by one week, consisting of static standing balance tests under different visual (eyes open vs. closed) and supportive (single limb vs. double limb) conditions, and dynamic balance tests consisting of forward and lateral reach and an assessment of limits of stability. Marker coordinate and joint angle data were concurrently recorded using the Kinect V2 skeletal tracking algorithm and the 3DMA system. Task-specific outcome measures from each system on Day 1 and 2 were compared. Concurrent validity of trunk angle data during the dynamic tasks and anterior-posterior range and path length in the static balance tasks was excellent (Pearson's r>0.75). In contrast, concurrent validity for medial-lateral range and path length was poor to modest for all trials except single leg eyes closed balance. Within device test-retest reliability was variable; however, the results were generally comparable between devices. In conclusion, the Kinect V2 has the potential to be used as a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of some aspects of balance performance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Balance; Functional reach; Kinect; Kinect V2; XBox One Kinect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26009500     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  41 in total

1.  Consensus Paper: Ataxic Gait.

Authors:  Pierre Cabaraux; Sunil K Agrawal; Huaying Cai; Rocco Salvatore Calabro; Carlo Casali; Loic Damm; Sarah Doss; Christophe Habas; Anja K E Horn; Winfried Ilg; Elan D Louis; Hiroshi Mitoma; Vito Monaco; Maria Petracca; Alberto Ranavolo; Ashwini K Rao; Serena Ruggieri; Tommaso Schirinzi; Mariano Serrao; Susanna Summa; Michael Strupp; Olivia Surgent; Matthis Synofzik; Shuai Tao; Hiroo Terasi; Diego Torres-Russotto; Brittany Travers; Jaimie A Roper; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Autonomous modeling of repetitive movement for rehabilitation exercise monitoring.

Authors:  Prayook Jatesiktat; Guan Ming Lim; Christopher Wee Keong Kuah; Dollaporn Anopas; Wei Tech Ang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 3.  A review of computational approaches for evaluation of rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Yalin Liao; Aleksandar Vakanski; Min Xian; David Paul; Russell Baker
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  THE USE OF MICROSOFT KINECT ™ FOR ASSESSING READINESS OF RETURN TO SPORT AND INJURY RISK EXERCISES: A VALIDATION STUDY.

Authors:  C Cody Tipton; Scott Telfer; Arien Cherones; Albert O Gee; Christopher Y Kweon
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-09

5.  Validation of a Commercially Available Markerless Motion-Capture System for Trunk and Lower Extremity Kinematics During a Jump-Landing Assessment.

Authors:  Timothy C Mauntel; Kenneth L Cameron; Brian Pietrosimone; Stephen W Marshall; Anthony C Hackney; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Reliability and concurrent validity of TRAZER compared to three-dimensional motion capture.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hogg; Lynette M Carlson; Abigail Rogers; Mason W Briles; Shellie N Acocello; Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Validation of a Computerized, Game-based Assessment Strategy to Measure Training Effects on Motor-Cognitive Functions in People With Dementia.

Authors:  Stefanie Wiloth; Nele Lemke; Christian Werner; Klaus Hauer
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.143

8.  Kinematic Validation of a Multi-Kinect v2 Instrumented 10-Meter Walkway for Quantitative Gait Assessments.

Authors:  Daphne J Geerse; Bert H Coolen; Melvyn Roerdink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Accuracy and Reliability of the Kinect Version 2 for Clinical Measurement of Motor Function.

Authors:  Karen Otte; Bastian Kayser; Sebastian Mansow-Model; Julius Verrel; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of a balance-based exergaming intervention using the Kinect sensor on posture stability in individuals with Parkinson's disease: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Meng-Che Shih; Ray-Yau Wang; Shih-Jung Cheng; Yea-Ru Yang
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.