| Literature DB >> 26006728 |
Eric Yue Ma1, M Reyes Calvo1, Jing Wang2, Biao Lian2, Mathias Mühlbauer3, Christoph Brüne4, Yong-Tao Cui5, Keji Lai6, Worasom Kundhikanjana1, Yongliang Yang5, Matthias Baenninger2, Markus König2, Christopher Ames4, Hartmut Buhmann4, Philipp Leubner4, Laurens W Molenkamp4, Shou-Cheng Zhang2, David Goldhaber-Gordon2, Michael A Kelly5, Zhi-Xun Shen7.
Abstract
The realization of quantum spin Hall effect in HgTe quantum wells is considered a milestone in the discovery of topological insulators. Quantum spin Hall states are predicted to allow current flow at the edges of an insulating bulk, as demonstrated in various experiments. A key prediction yet to be experimentally verified is the breakdown of the edge conduction under broken time-reversal symmetry. Here we first establish a systematic framework for the magnetic field dependence of electrostatically gated quantum spin Hall devices. We then study edge conduction of an inverted quantum well device under broken time-reversal symmetry using microwave impedance microscopy, and compare our findings to a non-inverted device. At zero magnetic field, only the inverted device shows clear edge conduction in its local conductivity profile, consistent with theory. Surprisingly, the edge conduction persists up to 9 T with little change. This indicates physics beyond simple quantum spin Hall model, including material-specific properties and possibly many-body effects.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26006728 PMCID: PMC4455136 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Microwave impedance microscopy (MIM) set-up and zero field gate dependence of 5.5 and 7.5 nm devices.
(a) Schematic of MIM set-up and device structure, showing line scan direction x. (b) MIM response as a function of the sheet conductance of the quantum well, obtained by finite element analysis. The sensitivity window is centred at 2 × 10−7 Ω−1 and extends roughly 2 orders of magnitude in both directions, as indicated by the two-tone colour scale. (c) Gate-dependent two-terminal resistance of a 50-μm long stripe on the 5.5 nm device. (d) Typical MIM-Im and MIM-Re single-line scan versus gate voltage (Vg) across a ∼5-μm wide mesa at 4.5 K. Physical edges are indicated by grey dashed lines. Two-tone colour scale is used in MIM-Im to reflect the MIM sensitivity window in b, with neutral grey corresponding to the maximum in MIM-Re. The mesa appears homogeneously insulating with no edge conduction in the bulk gapped region. The scale bar is 1 μm, for x direction only. (e) MIM-Im line-cuts when the QW is in p-type (−2.0 V), gap (2.5 V) and n-type (5.0 V). Black solid line is the mesa surface topography detail. MIM stays in constant-height mode with the tip ∼30 nm above the average mesa surface; when moving into the etched-away region outside the mesa, the tip-sample distance quickly increases to ∼160 nm and thus the MIM-Im signal decreases significantly. For the same reason the right part of the mesa has a slightly higher MIM-Im signal due to higher topography. This crosstalk only contributes a gate-independent modulation to the MIM signal. (f–h) Same measurements for the 7.5 nm device. Note the lower maximum two-terminal resistance and prominent edge conduction in the gapped region. Crosstalk from topography is again visible as a gate-independent modulation of MIM signal.
Figure 2Magnetic field dependence of the 5.5 and 7.5 nm devices.
(a) Calculated LL fan charts of the 5.5 nm device. Inset shows the bending of the electron-like (blue) and hole-like (red) lowest LLs near a physical edge. Green dashed line is the Fermi level. (b) Bulk DOS versus carrier density and magnetic field, converted from a. The conversion is necessary because the back gate linearly tunes the carrier density in the QW rather than the relative position between EF and the LLs. (c) Magnified image of b corresponding to the density range achievable with our back gate. Electron and hole side mobility edges are indicated. (d) two-terminal resistance versus back gate voltage and magnetic field at 4.5 K. For ease of comparison, the colour scale is chosen such that the corresponding sheet resistance range corresponds to the MIM sensitivity window in zero field limit (σxy=0). (e) Corresponding real-space MIM-Im images. The two-tone colour scale reflects the MIM sensitivity window. Inset shows the surface topography details so one can identify topography crosstalk. The scale bar is 1 μm. The linearly broadened insulating regime in d,e corresponds to mobility edges at fixed filling factors (orange and blue dashed lines, as also marked in c). (f–j) Same calculations and experimental results for the 7.5 nm device. Note the anomalous bending of the ‘zero modes' in f inset. Because the estimated disorder broadening (∼0.5 meV) and thermal broadening (∼0.35 meV) are much smaller than the anti-crossing gap (∼4 meV), the bulk is expected to remain insulating at the crossover field of 3.8 T as shown in h (Supplementary Fig. 4). Note the smaller tuning range in the 7.5 nm device. The major unexpected feature is the absence of insulating behaviour in region II* in i, which corresponds to edge conduction that survives up to 9 T as seen in j. The ‘trivial insulator' phase only appears near the p-type side. Purple dashed lines in i correspond to v∼±0.5 (also marked in h), visible in the 7.5 nm device due to higher mobility.
Figure 3Transport and MIM line-cut analysis for the 7.5 nm device at 3 and 7 T.
(a) Averaged line-cuts of the centre ⅓ section of the real-space MIM-Im images in the 3 T column of Fig. 2j, with a 1.0 V offset in MIM signal between each gate voltage. Gate voltage is from −1.5 to 3.0 V in 0.5-V steps. (b) Edge and bulk MIM-Im signal (at the red and blue dashed lines in a) and two-terminal resistance plotted against gate voltage. (c,d) Same plots for the 7 T column. Transport is clearly dominated by edge conduction in the bulk gapped regime in both fields, confirming the extended nature of the edge conduction observed by MIM.