Literature DB >> 26003943

Pavlovian conditioning to food reward as a function of eating disorder risk.

Robert S Astur1, Alexandra N Palmisano2, Ellie C Hudd2, Andrew W Carew2, Bonnie E Deaton2, Franchesca S Kuhney2, Rachel N Niezrecki2, Melissa Santos3.   

Abstract

The aim of this experiment was to examine the extent to which eating disorder risk affects the strength of food-reward conditioning. Eighty food-restricted undergraduates were placed into a VR environment consisting of two visually distinct rooms. Participants underwent multiple pairing sessions in which they were confined into one of the two rooms and explored a VR environment. Room A was paired with real-life M&Ms for three sessions, and Room B was paired with no food for three sessions. After a short delay, a test session was administered, and participants were given free access to the entire VR environment for 5 min. Participants also completed the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26; [11]), which is a standard screening tool of eating disorder risk. Participants displayed a significant conditioned place preference for the VR room previously paired with food, and they displayed a significant explicit preference for the M&M-paired room in a forced-choice test. There was a significant positive correlation between place preference strength and scores on the dieting subscale of the EAT-26. Additionally, ratings of the no-food room were significantly lower as dieting scores increased. This suggests that components of eating disorder risk can influence basic conditioning strength to places associated with food reward. For both males and females, additional correlations between eating disorder risk subscales and conditioning variables are discussed, and implications for future research are proposed in hopes of understanding how conditioning paradigms can provide insight into treating and preventing eating disorders.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned place preference; EAT-26; Eating disorder; Pavlovian conditioning; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003943     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  2 in total

1.  Measuring appetitive conditioned responses in humans.

Authors:  Margaret C Wardle; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-02-09

2.  Virtual reality conditioned place preference using monetary reward.

Authors:  Emma Childs; Robert S Astur; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.