Literature DB >> 26003308

The demographic consequences of mutualism: ants increase host-plant fruit production but not population growth.

Kevin R Ford1, Joshua H Ness2, Judith L Bronstein3, William F Morris4.   

Abstract

The impact of mutualists on a partner's demography depends on how they affect the partner's multiple vital rates and how those vital rates, in turn, affect population growth. However, mutualism studies rarely measure effects on multiple vital rates or integrate them to assess the ultimate impact on population growth. We used vital rate data, population models and simulations of long-term population dynamics to quantify the demographic impact of a guild of ant species on the plant Ferocactus wislizeni. The ants feed at the plant's extrafloral nectaries and attack herbivores attempting to consume reproductive organs. Ant-guarded plants produced significantly more fruit, but ants had no significant effect on individual growth or survival. After integrating ant effects across these vital rates, we found that projected population growth was not significantly different between unguarded and ant-guarded plants because population growth was only weakly influenced by differences in fruit production (though strongly influenced by differences in individual growth and survival). However, simulations showed that ants could positively affect long-term plant population dynamics through services provided during rare but important events (herbivore outbreaks that reduce survival or years of high seedling recruitment associated with abundant precipitation). Thus, in this seemingly clear example of mutualism, the interaction may actually yield no clear benefit to plant population growth, or if it does, may only do so through the actions of the ants during rare events. These insights demonstrate the value of taking a demographic approach to studying the consequences of mutualism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ant plant; Cactus demography; Integral projection model; Protection mutualism; Sonoran Desert

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003308     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3341-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rudgers; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Pathways to mutualism breakdown.

Authors:  Joel L Sachs; Ellen L Simms
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F Morris; Ruth A Hufbauer; Anurag A Agrawal; James D Bever; Victoria A Borowicz; Gregory S Gilbert; John L Maron; Charles E Mitchell; Ingrid M Parker; Alison G Power; Mark E Torchin; Diego P Vázquez
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 4.  A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Jason D Hoeksema; V Bala Chaudhary; Catherine A Gehring; Nancy Collins Johnson; Justine Karst; Roger T Koide; Anne Pringle; Catherine Zabinski; James D Bever; John C Moore; Gail W T Wilson; John N Klironomos; James Umbanhowar
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 5.  Effects of native and non-native vertebrate mutualists on plants.

Authors:  Clare E Aslan; Erika S Zavaleta; Don Croll; Bernie Tershy
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 6.  Current issues in the evolutionary ecology of ant-plant symbioses.

Authors:  Veronika E Mayer; Megan E Frederickson; Doyle McKey; Rumsaïs Blatrix
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  How context dependent are species interactions?

Authors:  Scott A Chamberlain; Judith L Bronstein; Jennifer A Rudgers
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Bushmeat poaching reduces the seed dispersal and population growth rate of a mammal-dispersed tree.

Authors:  Jedediah F Brodie; Olga E Helmy; Warren Y Brockelman; John L Maron
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  The phylogenetic distribution of extrafloral nectaries in plants.

Authors:  Marjorie G Weber; Kathleen H Keeler
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  An ant's-eye view of an ant-plant protection mutualism.

Authors:  M C Lanan; J L Bronstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  2 in total

1.  Opportunities and challenges of Integral Projection Models for modelling host-parasite dynamics.

Authors:  C Jessica E Metcalf; Andrea L Graham; Micaela Martinez-Bakker; Dylan Z Childs
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Ecological theory of mutualism: Robust patterns of stability and thresholds in two-species population models.

Authors:  Kayla R S Hale; Fernanda S Valdovinos
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.