Literature DB >> 16828927

Pathways to mutualism breakdown.

Joel L Sachs1, Ellen L Simms.   

Abstract

Mutualisms are ubiquitous in nature despite the widely held view that they are unstable interactions. Models predict that mutualists might often evolve into parasites, can abandon their partners to live autonomously and are also vulnerable to extinction. Yet a basic empirical question, whether mutualisms commonly break down, has been mostly overlooked. As we discuss here, recent progress in molecular systematics helps address this question. Newly constructed phylogenies reveal that parasites as well as autonomous (non-mutualist) taxa are nested within ancestrally mutualistic clades. Although models have focused on the propensity of mutualism to become parasitic, such shifts appear relatively rarely. By contrast, diverse systems exhibit reversions to autonomy, and this might be a common and unexplored endpoint to mutualism.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828927     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  88 in total

Review 1.  Cooperation for direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Olof Leimar; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  What traits are carried on mobile genetic elements, and why?

Authors:  D J Rankin; E P C Rocha; S P Brown
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation.

Authors:  Christina Toft; Siv G E Andersson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Macroevolutionary assembly of ant/plant symbioses: Pseudomyrmex ants and their ant-housing plants in the Neotropics.

Authors:  Guillaume Chomicki; Philip S Ward; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Breakdown and delayed cospeciation in the arbuscular mycorrhizal mutualism.

Authors:  Vincent Merckx; Martin I Bidartondo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  In situ phylogenetic structure and diversity of wild Bradyrhizobium communities.

Authors:  J L Sachs; S W Kembel; A H Lau; E L Simms
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  The roles of tolerance in the evolution, maintenance and breakdown of mutualism.

Authors:  David P Edwards
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-05-30

8.  Reduced biological control and enhanced chemical pest management in the evolution of fungus farming in ants.

Authors:  Hermógenes Fernández-Marín; Jess K Zimmerman; David R Nash; Jacobus J Boomsma; William T Wcislo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  From cooperation to combat: adverse effect of thermal stress in a symbiotic coral-crustacean community.

Authors:  J S Stella; P L Munday; S P W Walker; M S Pratchett; G P Jones
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant-pollinator mutualism.

Authors:  Rachel L Vannette; Marie-Pierre L Gauthier; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.