Literature DB >> 26003273

Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Robert Boostanfar1, Bruce Shapiro2, Michael Levy3, Zev Rosenwaks4, Han Witjes5, Barbara J Stegmann6, Jolanda Elbers5, Keith Gordon6, Bernadette Mannaerts5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare corifollitropin alfa with recombinant FSH treatment in terms of the vital pregnancy rate in older patients undergoing IVF.
DESIGN: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.
SETTING: Multicenter trial. PATIENT(S): A total of 1,390 women aged 35-42 years. INTERVENTION(S): A single injection of 150 μg of corifollitropin alfa or daily 300 IU of recombinant FSH for the first 7 days then daily recombinant FSH until three follicles reach ≥17 mm in size. Ganirelix was started on stimulation day 5 up to and including the day of recombinant hCG administration. If available, two good quality embryos were transferred on day 3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vital pregnancy rate (PR), number of oocytes, and live birth rate. RESULT(S): Vital PRs per started cycle were 23.9% in the corifollitropin alfa group and 26.9% in the recombinant FSH group, with an estimated difference (95% confidence interval) of -3.0% (-7.4 to 1.4). The mean (SD) number of recovered oocytes per started cycle was 10.7 (7.2) and 10.3 (6.8) in the corifollitropin alfa and the recombinant FSH groups, respectively, with an estimated difference of 0.5 (-0.2 to 1.2). The live birth rates per started cycle were 21.3% in the corifollitropin alfa group and 23.4% in the recombinant FSH group, with an estimated difference (95% confidence interval) -2.3% (-6.5 to 1.9). The incidence of serious adverse events was 0.4% versus 2.7% in the corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH groups, respectively, and of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS; all grades) was 1.7% in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): Treatment with corifollitropin alfa was proven noninferior to daily recombinant FSH with respect to vital PRs, number of oocytes retrieved, and live birth rates, and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01144416.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corifollitropin alfa; GnRH antagonist; assisted reproductive technology; recombinant FSH; women aged 35–42 years

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003273     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Impact of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of corifollitropin alfa during controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Marita Prohn; Rik de Greef; Frank van Aarle; Christine McCrary Sisk; Barbara J Stegmann
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  An open-label clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of corifollitropin alfa combined with hCG in adult men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Authors:  Eberhard Nieschlag; Pierre-Marc G Bouloux; Barbara J Stegmann; R Ravi Shankar; Yanfen Guan; Anjela Tzontcheva; Christine McCrary Sisk; Hermann M Behre
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients.

Authors:  Helmy Selman; Leonardo Rinaldi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Corifollitropin alfa vs recombinant FSH for controlled ovarian stimulation in women aged 35-42 years with a body weight ≥50 kg: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N L Vuong; D T Pham; H T Phung; H N Giang; G B Huynh; T T L Nguyen; M T Ho
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-11-28

5.  Association of progesterone production with serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in assisted reproductive technology cycles with corifollitropin alfa.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Lee; Shu-Ling Tzeng; Chun-I Lee; Hsiu-Hui Chen; Chun-Chia Huang; Shee-Uan Chen; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Le Dang Khoa; Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan; Nguyen Minh Tai Loc; Dang Quang Vinh; Quang Nhat Tran; Ho Manh Tuong
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-02-22

7.  Subcutaneous Progesterone Is Effective and Safe for Luteal Phase Support in IVF: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Phase III Trials.

Authors:  Jakob Doblinger; Barbara Cometti; Silvia Trevisan; Georg Griesinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Sergio Oehninger; Scott M Nelson; Pierre Verweij; Barbara J Stegmann
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Comparison of corifollitropin alfa and daily recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Süleyman Akarsu; Sibel Demir; Funda Gode; Ahmet Zeki Işık
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-30

10.  Comparative economic study of the use of corifollitropin alfa and daily rFSH for controlled ovarian stimulation in older patients: Cost-minimization analysis based on the PURSUE study.

Authors:  Gorka Barrenetxea; Juan Antonio García-Velasco; Belén Aragón; Jordi Osset; Max Brosa; Noemí López-Martínez; Buenaventura Coroleu
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.