Literature DB >> 26002263

Massive transfusion policies at trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

Maraya N Camazine1, Mark R Hemmila, Julie C Leonard, Rachel A Jacobs, Jennifer A Horst, Rosemary A Kozar, Grant V Bochicchio, Avery B Nathens, Henry M Cryer, Philip C Spinella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) have been developed to implement damage control resuscitation (DCR) principles. A survey of MTP policies from American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) participants was performed to establish which MTP activation, hemostatic resuscitation, and monitoring aspects of DCR are included in the MTP guidelines.
METHODS: On October 10, 2013, ACS-TQIP administration administered a cross-sectional electronic survey to 187 ACS-TQIP participants.
RESULTS: Seventy-one percent (132 of 187) of responses were analyzed, with 62% designated as Level I and 38% designated as Level II ACS-TQIP trauma centers. Sixty-nine percent of sites indicated that they have plasma immediately available for MTP activation. By policy, in the first group of blood products administered, 88% of sites target high (≥1:2) plasma-to-red blood cell (RBC) ratios and 10% target low ratios. Likewise, 79% of sites target high platelet-to-RBC ratios and 16% target low ratios. Eighteen percent of sites reported incorporating point-of-care thromboelastogram into MTP policies. The most common intravenous hemostatic adjunct incorporated into MTPs was tranexamic acid (49%). Thirty-four percent of sites reported that some or all of their emergency medical service agencies have the ability to administer blood products or hemostatic agents during prehospital transport. There were minimal differences in MTP policies or capabilities between Level I and II sites.
CONCLUSION: The majority of ACS-TQIP participants reported having MTPs that support the use of DCR principles including high plasma-to-RBC and platelet-to-RBC ratios. Immediate availability of plasma and product use by emergency medical services are becoming increasingly common, whereas the incorporation of point-of-care thromboelastogram into MTP policies remains low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002263     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  25 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the PROPPR trial transfusion protocols.

Authors:  Rachael A Callcut; Kit N Simpson; Sarah Baraniuk; Erin E Fox; Barbara C Tilley; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  If not now, when? The value of the MTP in managing massive bleeding.

Authors:  Mark H Yazer; Jason L Sperry; Andrew P Cap; Jansen H Seheult
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  [Modern coagulation management in bleeding trauma patients : Point-of-care guided administration of coagulation factor concentrates and hemostatic agents].

Authors:  Marc Maegele
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 4.  [Approaches to pre-hospital bleeding management : Current overview on civilian emergency medicine].

Authors:  H Lier; M Bernhard; J Knapp; C Buschmann; I Bretschneider; B Hossfeld
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Goal-directed Hemostatic Resuscitation of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing a Viscoelastic Assay to Conventional Coagulation Assays.

Authors:  Eduardo Gonzalez; Ernest E Moore; Hunter B Moore; Michael P Chapman; Theresa L Chin; Arsen Ghasabyan; Max V Wohlauer; Carlton C Barnett; Denis D Bensard; Walter L Biffl; Clay C Burlew; Jeffrey L Johnson; Fredric M Pieracci; Gregory J Jurkovich; Anirban Banerjee; Christopher C Silliman; Angela Sauaia
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prehospital blood transfusions in pediatric trauma and nontrauma patients: a single-center review of safety and outcomes.

Authors:  Aodhnait S Fahy; Cornelius A Thiels; Stephanie F Polites; Maile Parker; Michael B Ishitani; Christopher R Moir; Kathleen Berns; James R Stubbs; Donald H Jenkins; Scott P Zietlow; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Multicenter observational prehospital resuscitation on helicopter study.

Authors:  John B Holcomb; Michael D Swartz; Stacia M DeSantis; Thomas J Greene; Erin E Fox; Deborah M Stein; Eileen M Bulger; Jeffrey D Kerby; Michael Goodman; Martin A Schreiber; Martin D Zielinski; Terence O'Keeffe; Kenji Inaba; Jeffrey S Tomasek; Jeanette M Podbielski; Savitri N Appana; Misung Yi; Charles E Wade
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Rapid TEG efficiently guides hemostatic resuscitation in trauma patients.

Authors:  Julia R Coleman; Ernest E Moore; Michael P Chapman; Anirban Banerjee; Christopher C Silliman; Arsen Ghasabyan; James Chandler; Jason M Samuels; Angela Sauaia
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  How well does your massive transfusion protocol perform? A scoping review of quality indicators.

Authors:  Brenton Sanderson; Enrico Coiera; Lia Asrianti; Jeremy Field; Lise J Estcourt; Erica M Wood
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  The authors reply.

Authors:  Ithan D Peltan; Timothy R Watkins
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.