| Literature DB >> 26002128 |
Hua-Feng Xiao1, Zhi-Ye Chen2, Xin Lou3,4, Yu-Lin Wang2, Qiu-Ping Gui5, Yan Wang2, Kai-Ning Shi6, Zhen-Yu Zhou6, Dan-Dan Zheng6, Danny J J Wang7, Lin Ma8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that three-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labelling (pCASL) may have similar efficacy in astrocytic tumour grading as dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI), and the grading accuracy may be further improved when combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.Entities:
Keywords: Astrocytic tumours; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging; Grading; Three-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labelling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26002128 PMCID: PMC4636527 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3768-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Fig. 1A sixteen-year-old girl with anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO III) in the right basal ganglion and thalamus. The tumour showed hyperintense signal on T2WI. The tumour showed patchy enhancement on post-contrast T1WI. ADC map. ADC histogram of the tumour. ROI selection for the maximal CBF of the tumour on pCASL CBF color map. ROI selection for bilateral cerebellum CBF on pCASL CBF color map. ROI selection for the maximal rCBF of the tumour on DSC-PWI rCBF color map. ROI selection for bilateral cerebellum rCBF on DSC-PWI rCBF color map
Fig. 2A sixty-year-old woman with diffuse astrocytoma (WHO II) in the right frontal lobe. The tumour showed hyperintense signal on T2WI. The tumour demonstrated no enhancement on post-contrast T1WI. ADC map. ADC histogram of the tumour. ROI selection for the maximal CBF of the tumour on pCASL CBF color map. ROI selection for bilateral cerebellum CBF on pCASL CBF color map. ROI selection for the maximal rCBF of the tumour on DSC-PWI rCBF color map. ROI selection for bilateral cerebellum rCBF on DSC-PWI rCBF color map
ADC histogram values (mean ± SD) (×10-3 mm2/s) of LGA and HGA
| LGA ( | HGA ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean 10 % ADC | 0.886 ± 0.118 | 0.745 ± 0.079 | < 0.001 |
| Mean 25 % ADC | 1.005 ± 0.195 | 0.844 ± 0.089 | 0.003 |
| Mean 50 % ADC | 1.167 ± 0.302 | 1.239 ± 0.108 | 0.752 |
| Mean ADC | 1.418 ± 0.375 | 1.204 ± 0.188 | 0.019 |
| Minimum ADC | 0.625 ± 0.071 | 0.548 ± 0.093 | 0.038 |
| Maximum ADC | 3.437 ± 0.578 | 3.310 ± 0.676 | 0.519 |
SD=standard deviation
The nCBF and nrCBF (mean ± SD) of LGAs and HGAs
| LGA (n = 19) | HGA (n = 24) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| nCBF | 1.810 ± 0.979 | 4.505 ± 2.270 | < 0.001 |
| nrCBF | 2.070 ± 1.048 | 5.922 ± 2.630 | < 0.001 |
SD=standard deviation
Fig. 3Scatterplot of the correlation between the nCBF and nrCBF in LGAs and HGAs. Scatterplot of the correlation between the mean 10 % ADC value and nCBF in LGAs and HGAs. Scatterplot of the correlation between the mean 10 % ADC value and the nrCBF in LGAs and HGAs
ROC analysis of the mean 10 % ADC (×10-3 mm2/s), nCBF, nrCBF, mean 10 % ADC+ nCBF, and mean 10 % ADC+ nrCBF values for astrocytic tumour grading
| Cutoff value | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean 10 % ADC | 0.764 | 0.875 | 94.7 % | 62.5 % | 74.4 % |
| nCBF | 2.374 | 0.919 | 91.7 % | 84.2 % | 86.1 % |
| nrCBF | 3.464 | 0.939 | 79.2 % | 94.7 % | 88.6 % |
| Mean 10 % ADC + nCBF | N/A | 0.974 | N/A | N/A | 97.7 % |
| Mean 10 % ADC + nrCBF | N/A | 0.974 | N/A | N/A | 95.3 % |
N/A=not available
Fig. 4ROC map of the mean 10 % ADC, nCBF, nrCBF, mean 10 % ADC+ nCBF, and mean 10 % ADC+ nrCBF values for the discrimination of LGAs vs. HGAs