Literature DB >> 26000502

A national survey on public perceptions of miscarriage.

Jonah Bardos1, Daniel Hercz, Jenna Friedenthal, Stacey A Missmer, Zev Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess attitudes and perceptions of U.S. survey respondents regarding prevalence, causes, and emotional effects of miscarriage.
METHODS: We used a questionnaire consisting of 33 questions administered in January of 2013 to men and women aged 18-69 years across the United States.
RESULTS: Participants from 49 states completed the questionnaire: 45% male and 55% female (N=1,084). Fifteen percent reported they or their partner experienced at least one miscarriage. Fifty-five percent of respondents believed that miscarriage occurred in 5% or less of all pregnancies. Commonly believed causes of miscarriage included a stressful event (76%), lifting a heavy object (64%), previous use of an intrauterine device (28%), or oral contraceptives (22%). Of those who had a miscarriage, 37% felt they had lost a child, 47% felt guilty, 41% reported feeling that they had done something wrong, 41% felt alone, and 28% felt ashamed. Nineteen percent fewer people felt they had done something wrong when a cause for the miscarriage was found. Seventy-eight percent of all participants reported wanting to know the cause of their miscarriage, even if no intervention could have prevented it from occurring. Disclosures of miscarriages by public figures assuaged feelings of isolation for 28% of respondents. Level of education and gender had a significant effect on perceptions and understanding of miscarriage.
CONCLUSION: Respondents to our survey erroneously believed that miscarriage is a rare complication of pregnancy, with the majority believing that it occurred in 5% or less of all pregnancies. There were also widespread misconceptions about causes of miscarriage. Those who had experienced a miscarriage frequently felt guilty, isolated, and alone. Identifying a potential cause of the miscarriage may have an effect on patients' psychological and emotional responses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26000502      PMCID: PMC4443861          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  25 in total

1.  Treatment Decisions at the Time of Miscarriage Diagnosis.

Authors:  Courtney A Schreiber; Veronica Chavez; Paul G Whittaker; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Ebony Easley; Frances K Barg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  At the dawn of personalized reproductive medicine: opportunities and challenges with incorporating multigene panel testing into fertility care.

Authors:  Piraye Yurttas Beim; David-Emlyn Parfitt; Lei Tan; Elaine A Sugarman; Tina Hu-Seliger; Caterina Clementi; Brynn Levy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Study on the correlation between the ultrasound phenotype and copy number variation of abnormal embryo in spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Shuyin Tan; Pingshan Pan; Zuojian Yang; Jiasun Su; Hongwei Wei
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 1.697

4.  SNP rs12794714 of CYP2R1 is associated with serum vitamin D levels and recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA): a case-control study.

Authors:  Ding-Yuan Liu; Ren-Yan Li; Li-Juan Fu; Enoch Appiah Adu-Gyamfi; Yin Yang; Ying Xu; Le-Tian Zhao; Tian-Feng Zhang; Hua-Qiong Bao; Xiao-Ou Xu; Xiao-Han Gao; Xue-Niu Yang; Yu-Bin Ding
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990-2011.

Authors:  Lauren M Rossen; Katherine A Ahrens; Amy M Branum
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Natasa Dzidic; Michelle N Strecker; Sara Commander; Mary K Travis; Charles Doherty; R Weslie Tyson; Arturo E Mendoza; Mary Stephenson; Craig A Dise; Carlos W Benito; Mandolin S Ziadie; Karine Hovanes
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  The safety of atovaquone-proguanil for the prevention and treatment of malaria in pregnancy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kristin L Andrejko; Romana C Mayer; Stephanie Kovacs; Emma Slutsker; Emily Bartlett; Kathrine R Tan; Julie R Gutman
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 20.441

8.  Cloud Based Surveys to Assess Patient Perceptions of Health Care: 1000 Respondents in 3 days for US $300.

Authors:  Jonah Bardos; Jenna Friedenthal; Jessica Spiegelman; Zev Williams
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-08-23

9.  Causal explanations of miscarriage amongst Qataris.

Authors:  Susie Kilshaw; Nadia Omar; Stella Major; Mona Mohsen; Faten El Taher; Halima Al Tamimi; Kristina Sole; Daniel Miller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Association of interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms with recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chongjuan Gu; Hongxia Gong; Zheng Zhang; Zhao Yang; Yongxin Ma
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.