Literature DB >> 16192138

The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.

Carol Levine1, Ruth Faden, Christine Grady, Dale Hammerschmidt, Lisa Eckenwiler, Jeremy Sugarman.   

Abstract

Vulnerability is one of the least examined concepts in research ethics. Vulnerability was linked in the Belmont Report to questions of justice in the selection of subjects. Regulations and policy documents regarding the ethical conduct of research have focused on vulnerability in terms of limitations of the capacity to provide informed consent. Other interpretations of vulnerability have emphasized unequal power relationships between politically and economically disadvantaged groups and investigators or sponsors. So many groups are now considered to be vulnerable in the context of research, particularly international research, that the concept has lost force. In addition, classifying groups as vulnerable not only stereotypes them, but also may not reliably protect many individuals from harm. Certain individuals require ongoing protections of the kind already established in law and regulation, but attention must also be focused on characteristics of the research protocol and environment that present ethical challenges.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16192138     DOI: 10.1080/15265160490497083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  52 in total

1.  Binational Substance Abuse Research and Internal Review Boards: Human Subject Risks and Suggestions for Protections.

Authors:  Victor Garcia
Journal:  Hum Organ       Date:  2009

2.  How researchers define vulnerable populations in HIV/AIDS clinical trials.

Authors:  Sohini Sengupta; Bernard Lo; Ronald P Strauss; Joseph Eron; Allen L Gifford
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2010-12

3.  The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Jane Welch; Rachel Lally; Jennifer E Miller; Stephanie Pittman; Lynda Brodsky; Arthur L Caplan; Gina Uhlenbrauck; Darcy M Louzao; James H Fischer; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  "Suspended animation," my mother's wife and cultural discernment: considerations for genetic research among immigrants.

Authors:  Judith Lee Kissell
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2005

5.  Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.

Authors:  Philip J Nickel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006

6.  Exploring the ethics of clinical research in an urban community.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Lindsay A Hampson; Gwenyth R Wallen; Migdalia V Rivera-Goba; Kelli L Carrington; Barbara B Mittleman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Is there a universal understanding of vulnerability? Experiences with Russian and Romanian trainees in research ethics.

Authors:  Sana Loue; Bebe Loff
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Rethinking the vulnerability of minority populations in research.

Authors:  Wendy Rogers; Margaret Meek Lange
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Protecting and respecting the vulnerable: existing regulations or further protections?

Authors:  Stephanie R Solomon
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-02

10.  Understanding bureaucracy in health science ethics: toward a better institutional review board.

Authors:  Barry Bozeman; Catherine Slade; Paul Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.