| Literature DB >> 26000195 |
Huzefa A Raja1, Amninder Kaur1, Tamam El-Elimat1, Mario Figueroa2, Rahul Kumar3, Gagan Deep3, Rajesh Agarwal3, Stanley H Faeth4, Nadja B Cech1, Nicholas H Oberlies1.
Abstract
Use of the herb milk thistle (Silybum marianum) is widespread, and its chemistry has been studied for over 50 years. However, milk thistle endophytes have not been studied previously for their fungal and chemical diversity. We examined the fungal endophytes inhabiting this medicinal herb to determine: (1) species composition and phylogenetic diversity of fungal endophytes; (2) chemical diversity of secondary metabolites produced by these organisms; and (3) cytotoxicity of the pure compounds against the human prostate carcinoma (PC-3) cell line. Forty-one fungal isolates were identified from milk thistle comprising 25 operational taxonomic units based on BLAST search via GenBank using published authentic sequences from nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequence data. Maximum likelihood analyses of partial 28S rRNA gene showed that these endophytes had phylogenetic affinities to four major classes of Ascomycota, the Dothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, and Leotiomycetes. Chemical studies of solid-substrate fermentation cultures led to the isolation of four new natural products. In addition, 58 known secondary metabolites, representing diverse biosynthetic classes, were isolated and characterized using a suite of nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry techniques. Selected pure compounds were tested against the PC-3 cell line, where six compounds displayed cytotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Ascomycota; Silybum marianum; endophyte; milk thistle
Year: 2015 PMID: 26000195 PMCID: PMC4409047 DOI: 10.1080/21501203.2015.1009186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycology ISSN: 2150-1203
Secondary metabolites isolated and/or identified from the selected endophytic fungal extracts of milk thistle.
| Fungal identity based on ITS | Isolate number | Source (plant part) | Secondary metabolites | Characterization techniques (references) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G40 | Seed | 9-O-methylalternariol, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G47 | Leaf | Alternariol | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G48 | Stem | Destruxin B, Homodestruxin B, and | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G55 | Leaf | Euplectin, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G49 | Leaf | Antibiotic PF 1052 | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G50 | Leaf | Destruxin B, Homodestruxin B, and | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G58 | Leaf | Pyrenocines A and B, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G77 | Leaf | Methyl asterrate, | NMR, UV, and MS (Matsumoto et al. | |
| G111 | Seed | (-)-α-tetrahydro-bisabolen-2,5,6-triol | Dereplication: UV, retention time, and MS | |
| G323 | Leaf | Thielavins B and C | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G324 | Leaf | O-Methyldihydro | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G339 | Leaf | Bisorbicillinolide, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G340 | Leaf | Verrucarin A, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G341 | Leaf | Dihydro-5-(hydroxyphenylmethyl)-2(3H)-furanone | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G343 | 1,8-dimethoxynaphthalene | NMR, UV, and MS | ||
| G344 | Leaf | Beauvericin | NMR, UV, and MS (Zhan et al. | |
| G377 | Leaf | Monascuskaoliaone, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G378 | Leaf | Alternariol, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G410 | Leaf | (3R)-5-methylmellein, | NMR, UV, optical rotation, and MS | |
| G411 | Leaf | (3R)-5-methylmellein, | NMR, UV, and MS | |
| G412 | Leaf | Paeciloxocin A, | NMR, UV, and MS |
List of 25 identified OTUs, GenBank accession numbers, their origin, and abundance. In most cases, isolates were grouped based on 98% ITS rDNA sequence similarity and identified using BLAST search.
| OTU identification | Species identification of most homologous sequence from GenBank based on BLAST search* | OTU number | Strain numbers/GenBank numbers | Origin/abundance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem | Leaf | Root | Seed | ||||
| (OTU 1) | G111 (KM215632) | 1 | 1 | ||||
| (OTU 2) | G323 (KM215635) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 3) | G324 (KM215636) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 4) | G325 (KM215637) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 5) | G339 (KM215638) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 6) | G340 (KM215639) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 7) | G341 (KM215651) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 8) | G343 (KM215641) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 9) | G367 (KM215644) | 1 | |||||
| – | (OTU 10) | G377 (KM215645) | 1 | ||||
| (OTU 11) | G78 (KM215630)/G379 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| (OTU 12) | G410 (KM215652) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 13) | G411 (KM215648) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 14) | G412 (KM215649) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 15) | G413 (KM215653) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 16) | G44 (KM215616) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 17) | G45 (KM215617) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 18) | G342 (KM215640) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 19) | G54 (KM215621)/G58 | 6 | |||||
| (OTU 20) | G40 (KM215615)/G47 | 4 | 1 | ||||
| (OTU 21) | G49 (KM215620)/G50 | 4 | |||||
| (OTU 22) | G344 (KM215642)/G345 | 2 | |||||
| (OTU 23) | G85 (KF367458) | 1 | |||||
| (OTU 24) | G246 (KM215633)/G248 | 2 | |||||
| (OTU 25) | G77 (AB859956)/G82 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Notes: *Fungal endophyte OTUs were tentatively assigned to either genus or species by matching the most homologous sequences in GenBank by BLAST search. Where possible, only authentic sequences (RefSeq) were used for assigning OTUs preferentially from type or other authentic cultures generated by taxonomic specialist published in high impact factor Mycology journals. When multiple species were found to have high sequence similarity or when <98% sequence homology was found with a published authentic sequence for which a culture was deposited in a public culture collection, we choose to take a more conservative approach and use only the genus name for OTU assignment. Furthermore, most OTU identifications were corroborated via their higher level phylogenetic placement using a portion of partial LSU sequence (D1/D2 region) (see Fig S8, Supporting Information).
For OTU names followed by ‘#’ symbol, we used morphological characteristics of conidia or teleomorph formed in culture as well as sequence data from portions of partial LSU gene sequences (D1/D2) region and/or protein coding data in addition to ITS data in separately published studies by our research group to confirm OTU identification.
Figure 1.Structures of selected secondary metabolites identified from fungal endophytes of milk thistle and their biosynthetic classes.
Figure 2.Structures of new secondary metabolites (1, 3, 4, and 6) and selected relevant analogues (2 and 5).