Literature DB >> 26000195

Phylogenetic and chemical diversity of fungal endophytes isolated from Silybum marianum (L) Gaertn. (milk thistle).

Huzefa A Raja1, Amninder Kaur1, Tamam El-Elimat1, Mario Figueroa2, Rahul Kumar3, Gagan Deep3, Rajesh Agarwal3, Stanley H Faeth4, Nadja B Cech1, Nicholas H Oberlies1.   

Abstract

Use of the herb milk thistle (Silybum marianum) is widespread, and its chemistry has been studied for over 50 years. However, milk thistle endophytes have not been studied previously for their fungal and chemical diversity. We examined the fungal endophytes inhabiting this medicinal herb to determine: (1) species composition and phylogenetic diversity of fungal endophytes; (2) chemical diversity of secondary metabolites produced by these organisms; and (3) cytotoxicity of the pure compounds against the human prostate carcinoma (PC-3) cell line. Forty-one fungal isolates were identified from milk thistle comprising 25 operational taxonomic units based on BLAST search via GenBank using published authentic sequences from nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequence data. Maximum likelihood analyses of partial 28S rRNA gene showed that these endophytes had phylogenetic affinities to four major classes of Ascomycota, the Dothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, and Leotiomycetes. Chemical studies of solid-substrate fermentation cultures led to the isolation of four new natural products. In addition, 58 known secondary metabolites, representing diverse biosynthetic classes, were isolated and characterized using a suite of nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry techniques. Selected pure compounds were tested against the PC-3 cell line, where six compounds displayed cytotoxicity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ascomycota; Silybum marianum; endophyte; milk thistle

Year:  2015        PMID: 26000195      PMCID: PMC4409047          DOI: 10.1080/21501203.2015.1009186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycology        ISSN: 2150-1203


Introduction

Endophytes are fungi or bacteria that inhabit healthy living plant tissues for all or part of their life cycle without causing disease (Wilson 1995). Fungal endophytes are ubiquitous among plants and are phylogenetically and ecologically diverse (Petrini 1991; Arnold 2001, 2007); they are isolated often by rigorous surface sterilization of healthy plant parts followed by subsequent incubation in nutrient media (Carroll 1991). Two major groups of endophytes can be recognized based on their mode of transmission, the systemic, vertically transmitted endophytes that have been found in grasses (Clavicipitaceae, Ascomycota), and the non-systemic, horizontally transmitted endophytes that have been found in all terrestrial and aquatic plants examined to date (Rodriguez et al. 2009). Together, these fungal endophytes represent an abundance of unexplored and novel diversity, both from mycological (Faeth and Hammon 1997; Saikkonen et al. 1998; Arnold et al. 2000; Arnold 2001, 2007; Suryanarayanan et al. 2005; Saikkonen 2007; Gazis et al. 2012) and chemical perspectives (Strobel and Daisy 2003; Suryanarayanan et al. 2009; Kharwar et al. 2011), thus warranting intensive exploration of these hyperdiverse endosymbionts for phylogenetic and chemical diversity (Smith et al. 2008). Over the last decade, there have been numerous studies on fungal endophytes of medicinal plants (Tan and Zou 2001; Strobel and Daisy 2003; Kumar and Hyde 2004; Tejesvi et al. 2007, 2011; Huang et al. 2008; Naik et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2011; de Siqueira et al. 2011; Verma et al. 2011; Bascom-Slack et al. 2012; Miller, Qing, Sze, Neilan, et al. 2012; Miller, Qing, Sze, Roufogalis, et al. 2012; Langenfeld et al. 2013), which have begun to address questions about the diversity and distribution patterns of these endophytes in various parts of the plant. In addition, endophytes have also been investigated in search for new secondary metabolites (Schulz et al. 2002; Chomcheon et al. 2005, 2006; Puri et al. 2005; Gu et al. 2007; Aly et al. 2008, 2011; Kusari et al. 2009; Debbab et al. 2009). However, fungal endophytes from a well-known ethnobotanical plant commonly known as milk thistle, Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. (Asteraceae), have not been explored, and thus both the fungal and the chemical diversity of endophytes in this herb remain uncharacterized. Milk thistle consistently ranks among the best-selling herbs in the USA (Blumenthal et al. 2006). Seeds from milk thistle have been used since antiquity for their hepatoprotective properties (Kroll et al. 2007; Polyak et al. 2013). Through several fruitful collaborations, members of our team have been investigating this herb for over a decade including studies for prostate cancer chemoprevention (Davis-Searles et al. 2005; Deep et al. 2007; Deep, Oberlies, et al. 2008; Deep, Raina, et al. 2008; Deep et al. 2010; Graf et al. 2007), treatment of hepatitis C infection (Morishima et al. 2010; Polyak et al. 2010; Wagoner et al. 2010, 2011; Blaising et al. 2013), and to evaluate enteric metabolism (Brantley et al. 2010, 2013, 2014). Phytochemical studies on milk thistle have led to the isolation of seven major diastereoisomers (Kim et al. 2003; Lee and Liu 2003). Although much is known about the phytochemistry of milk thistle, major gaps remain in our knowledge about the fungal species composition and mycochemisty of this plant. Despite chemical investigations of plant-based metabolites of milk thistle that spans >50 years (Sy-Cordero et al. 2012; Napolitano et al. 2013), no studies on the endophytes from this botanical have been reported. In the last year, however, members of our team showed that silybin A, silybin B, and isosilybin A, three of the seven flavonolignans that constitute silymarin, an extract of milk thistle seeds (achenes) (Kroll et al. 2007), were detected for the first time from a fungal endophyte, Aspergillus iizukae (G77), which was isolated from the surface-sterilized leaves of milk thistle (El-Elimat et al. 2014). We also reported on a series of polyhydroxyanthraquinones from the guttates of Penicillium restrictum (G85), which was isolated from the stems of milk thistle (Figueroa et al. 2014). To further understand the chemical mycology of fungal endophytes of milk thistle, a culture-based approach was initiated using molecular data from the nuclear ribosomal genes, such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the partial region of the large subunit (LSU) nrRNA gene, to identify the fungal endophytes of this medicinal herb. The primary goal was to culture fungal endophytes from leaves, stems, roots, and seeds of milk thistle to evaluate species composition and phylogenetic diversity. Additionally, we profiled the chemical diversity by identifying the secondary metabolites produced by these fungal endophytes (Strobel and Strobel 2007; Bascom-Slack et al. 2012). Finally, as part of our efforts towards screening our in-house library of pure compounds in available bioassays, selected metabolites that were obtained in sufficient quantity and purity during the course of these studies were also evaluated for cytotoxicity against a prostate cancer cell line (PC-3).

Materials and methods

Sampling of plants

Whole plants and seeds of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. (Asteraceae) were obtained from Horizon Herbs, LLC (Williams, OR, USA). A voucher specimen was deposited at the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU602014). Four different collections of whole plants and seeds were obtained for the study in 2011 (Lot # 6490; Lot # 6510), 2012 (Lot # 12348), and 2013 (Lot # 6462).

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Fungal endophytes were isolated from healthy living milk thistle plants. The stems, leaves, roots, and seeds of the plant were cut into small pieces (~2–5 mm in length) and washed with tap water. Subsequently, the segments were surface sterilized by sequential immersion in 95% ethanol (10 s), sodium hypochlorite (10–15% available chlorine, Sigma) (2 min), and 70% ethanol (2 min) using a modification of the protocol described previously (Arnold et al. 2001, 2003; Arnold and Lutzoni 2007). The plant segments were transferred using aseptic conditions onto 2% malt extract agar (MEA, Difco, 20 g MEA, 1 L sterile distilled water amended with antibiotics streptomycin sulphate of 250 mg l−1 and penicillin G of 250 mg l−1); antibiotics were used to prevent the growth of bacterial endophytes. To test the efficacy of the surface-sterilization procedure, individual surface-sterilized segments were touched and then removed from the surface on separate 2% MEA plates with antibiotics. The absence of fungal growth on the nutrient media confirmed that the sterilization procedure was effective in eliminating epiphytic fungi (Shultz et al. 1998). A total of 605 segments of leaf, stem, roots, and seeds were plated. Plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at room temperature (RT) in 12 h of dark/light until the emergence of fungal colonies was observed. The fungi were subsequently grown on 2% MEA, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, Difco), and 2% soy peptone, 2% dextrose, and 1% yeast extract (YESD). The fungal cultures are maintained at 9°C at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Fungal Culture Collection.

Characterization of fungal endophytes

Where possible, colony morphospecies identifications were made using methods outlined earlier (Gazis and Chaverri 2010). However, as many fungal endophytes do not sporulate in culture, species identification using morphological characters can be challenging (Arnold and Lutzoni 2007; Hyde and Soytong 2008). Therefore, molecular sequence data from the nuclear ribosomal ITS along with the 5.8s region were used since this region has been designated as an official barcode for fungi (Schoch et al. 2012). In addition, the first two domains of the nuclear ribosomal LSU (nrRNA gene) were sequenced to evaluate phylogenetic diversity and distribution within the Ascomycota (Liu et al. 2012).

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

For extraction of genomic DNA, mycelium from axenic cultures was scraped with a sterile scalpel from plastic Petri plates and ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Approximately 400 µl of AP1 buffer from the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) was added to the mycelial powder, and DNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was eluted in 50 µl of molecular biology grade water. Total genomic DNA was observed on a 1% tris-borate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Fragments of complete ITS, ~600–650 bp and partial LSU (hypervariable regions D1/D2 divergent domains; ~600 bp) (Liu et al. 2012) were amplified as a single fragment using PuReTaq™ Ready-To-Go polymerase chain reaction (PCR) beads (GE Biosciences Healthcare, NJ, USA), using a combination of ITS5/ITS1F/ITS1/LROR (forward) and ITS4/LR3 (reverse) primers (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993; Rehner and Samuels 1995), following established thermocycler parameters outlined previously (Promputtha and Miller 2010). The PCR products were purified to remove excess primers, dNTPs, and non-specific amplification products with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN Inc.). Purified PCR products were used in 11 µl sequencing reactions with BigDye® Terminators v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and sequenced bidirectionally using the above primer combinations. Sequences were generated on an Applied Biosystems 3730XL high-throughput capillary sequencer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Biotech facility.

Sequence alignment

Individual fragments were edited, and contigs for ITS and LSU were assembled using Sequencher 5.2.3 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Established guidelines (Nilsson et al. 2012) were followed for all newly generated ITS sequences.

Designation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs)

For designation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs), the ITS sequences were subjected to a BLAST search against GenBank. A cut-off proxy of 98% was chosen for delineation of OTUs based on previous studies (Nilsson et al. 2006, 2008; Begerow et al. 2010; Gazis and Chaverri 2010; Koljalg et al. 2013). In addition, and where appropriate, knowledge of culture morphology was applied to the ITS data to make OTU designation more reliable. For designation of taxonomic names, the results of the ITS BLAST search using GenBank were interpreted with caution using modification of outlined criteria (Goncalves et al. 2012). For species identities, for ≥99–100%, genus and species were accepted; for 97% identity, genus and species were accepted by using the term (cf. = compares with); for ≤97–95%, only genus was accepted.

Taxon sampling and phylogenetic analyses

The entire ITS region along with the 5.8S gene were sequenced together with the adjacent D1/D2 region of the 28S rRNA gene. ITS sequences were obtained for 41 representative isolates, whereas partial (D1/D2 region) of the 28S rRNA gene were obtained for 37 representative isolates. The ITS region was used to discriminate OTUs based on 98% sequence similarity and construction of species phylogeny, whereas the partial LSU region was used for phylogenetic analysis to determine the phylogenetic affinities of isolates with other closely related members of Ascomycota. ITS sequences were obtained for 41 representative isolates and aligned using the multiple sequence alignment programme, MUSCLE® (Edgar 2004), with default parameters in operation. MUSCLE® was implemented using the program Seaview (Gouy et al. 2010). Prior to maximum likelihood (ML) analysis, ambiguous regions were removed from the final alignment using G blocks (Castresana 2000; Talavera and Castresana 2007). The ML analysis was performed using RAxML v. 7.0.4 (Stamatakis et al. 2008) on the CIPRES Portal (Miller et al. 2010.) v. 2.0 with the default rapid hill-climbing algorithm and GTR model employing 1000 fast bootstrap searches. Clades with bootstrap values ≥70% were considered as significant and of strong support (Hillis and Bull 1993). Taxon sampling for ML analysis of the LSU dataset was obtained from previous study on the phylogenetic relationships of Ascomycota (Schoch et al. 2009). To visualize the higher taxonomic affiliations of the milk thistle fungal endophytes, partial LSU data (D1/D2 domains) from 37 representative isolates were incorporated into a core alignment of 189 taxa sampled from the Ascomycota (Schoch et al. 2009), which consisted of 1519 nucleotides. The final LSU alignment, after ambiguous characters were excluded, consisted of 1264 nucleotides. Representatives of four classes of Ascomycota (Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes, and Sordariomycetes) were included in the 226 taxa alignment, which included 37 representative isolates from the D1/D2 region of the LSU from milk thistle endophytes. Subsequently, ML analysis was conducted as outlined earlier using RAxML. Combined ITS-LSU sequence data generated for this study were deposited in GenBank under following accession numbers (KM215615–KM215649), whereas complete ITS sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers (KM215650–KM215653).

General experimental procedures for chemical analyses

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were conducted using an Agilent-700, JEOL ECA-500, and/or ECS-400 spectrometers (700, 500, or 400 MHz for 1H and 175, 125, or 100 MHz for 13C; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). HRESIMS data were collected using an electrospray ionization source coupled to a Q-ToF Premier mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) or a LTQ Orbitrap XL system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) in both positive and/or negative ionization modes by either direct injection or via a liquid chromatography/autosampler system that consisted of Acquity UPLC system (Waters Corp.). A CombiFlash Rf system using a RediSep Rf Si-gel Gold column (both from Teledyne-Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA) was employed for normal-phase flash column chromatography. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separations were performed using a Varian Prostar HPLC system (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with Prostar 210 pumps and a Prostar 335 photodiode array (PDA) detector using Galaxie Chromatography Workstation software (version 1.9.3.2, Varian Inc.). YMC ODS-A (Waters Corp.; 5 µm; columns of dimensions 250 × 20 mm, 250 × 10 mm, and 250 × 4.6 mm) or Kinetex C18 (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA; 5 µm; columns of dimensions 250 × 21.2 mm and 250 × 4.6 mm) was used for preparative, semi-preparative, and analytical HPLC, respectively. For ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) analysis, a BEH C18 (Waters Corp.; 1.7 μm; 50 × 2.1 mm) column was used. Optical rotation data were acquired on a Rudolph Research Autopol III polarimeter. Electronic circular dichroism (ECD) data were collected using an Olis DSM 17CD spectrophotometer (Olis, Bogard, GA, USA). UV data were collected using a Varian Cary 100 Bio UV–vis spectrophotometer. The solvents were purchased from Fisher Scientific.

Fungal cultures for solid-state fermentation

For chemical extractions, fungal cultures were grown on rice (VanderMolen et al. 2013). To make seed cultures for inoculating rice, a piece of fresh culture grown in MEA medium was excised from the leading edge of the colony and transferred to a liquid medium containing 2% soy peptone, 2% dextrose, and 1% yeast extract (YESD). Following incubation (7 days) at 22°C with agitation, the culture was used to inoculate 50 ml of rice media prepared using rice and twice the volume of rice with H2O in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask. This was incubated at 22°C until the cultures showed good growth (typically 14–21 days) to generate the screener cultures. For large-scale production of fungal cultures, four 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks were inoculated using one seed culture for each flask.

Chemical extraction of fungal cultures

To each 250 ml flask containing a fungal culture, 60 ml of 1:1 MeOH/CHCl3 were added. The cultures were chopped with a spatula and were shaken overnight (~16 h; RT) at ~100 rpm. The cultures were filtered by vacuum, and the remaining residues were washed with MeOH. To the filtrate, 90 ml of CHCl3 and 150 ml of water were added. The mixtures were stirred for 30 min and then transferred to separatory funnels. The bottom layers were drawn off into round bottom flasks, which were evaporated to dryness. These dried organic extracts were reconstituted with 100 ml of 1:1 MeOH/MeCN and 100 ml of hexanes and transferred to separatory funnels, where the biphasic solutions were shaken vigorously. The MeOH/MeCN layer was drawn off and evaporated to dryness under vacuum to obtain the organic extract. For scaled-up fermentation extracts (4 × 250 ml flasks), a protocol similar to that described above was employed, and the volumes of various solvents were adjusted accordingly.

Isolation of secondary metabolites

Preliminary analysis of the crude extracts was performed using UPLC–PDA–high-resolution tandem mass spectrometric dereplication protocol, as detailed previously (El-Elimat et al. 2013). In an isolated case (G111), these data were sufficient for structural characterization. The following general protocol was used for chemical analyses of the remaining fungal extracts. Each crude extract was adsorbed on a minimum amount of Celite 545 (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) and dried before loading on to a cartridge. This adsorbed mixture was subjected to normal-phase silica gel flash column chromatography employing a step gradient with hexanes, CHCl3, and MeOH. Based on NMR and/or analytical HPLC profiles of the pooled column fractions, according to the UV and evaporative light scattering detector data, samples were then selected for further purification by preparative reversed-phase (RP) HPLC, resulting in the isolation of pure compounds. In a few cases (G323, G377, G410, G411, G412, and G413), the crude extract was directly subjected to preparative RP HPLC without a prior separation employing normal-phase column chromatography. Finally, the pure secondary metabolites (>95% purity by UPLC and/or NMR) were characterized using a suite of NMR and MS techniques. In cases where the complete NMR data for known compounds were not reported in the literature, they have been presented in the Supporting Information. In the process of structure elucidation, if the NMR data for selected compounds were recorded in deuterated solvents other than those reported in the literature, then those data have also been presented (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Since HPLC methods used were unique to each extract/fraction that was pursued for additional separation, the details have not been discussed here. However, the isolation protocols for the new compounds are presented below as representative examples. Isolation of biscognin A (1), chlamydospordiol (2), and biscognin B (3) A defatted organic extract of Biscogniauxia mediterranea (G410; 190 mg) was subjected to RP HPLC [gradient elution using MeCN:H2O (containing 0.1% HCOOH): 20–80% MeCN for 50 min and 80–100% for 20 min; λ = 210 and 254 nm] using a YMC ODS-A column (250 × 20 mm) eluting at a flow rate of 12 ml/min to afford chlamydospordiol (2; 16.38 mg, tR 8.5 min), biscognin B (3; 2.86 mg, tR 21.0 min), and biscognin A (1; 1.78 mg, tR 22.5 min) in addition to other metabolites listed in Table 2.
Table 2.

Secondary metabolites isolated and/or identified from the selected endophytic fungal extracts of milk thistle.

Fungal identity based on ITSIsolate numberSource (plant part)Secondary metabolitesCharacterization techniques (references)
Alternaria sp.G40Seed9-O-methylalternariol,Pseurotin A, andTyroscherinNMR, UV, and MS(Hayakawa et al. 2004; Schmeda-Hirschmann et al. 2008; Tae et al. 2010; de Souza et al. 2013)
G47LeafAlternariolNMR, UV, and MS(Koch et al. 2005)
G48StemDestruxin B, Homodestruxin B, andAntibiotic PF 1052NMR, UV, and MS(Buchwaldt and Jensen 1991; Koyama et al. 2005)
G55LeafEuplectin,Coneuplectin, andAntibiotic PF 1052NMR, UV, and MS(Ernst-Russell et al. 2000; Koyama et al. 2005)
Alternaria sp.G49LeafAntibiotic PF 1052NMR, UV, and MS(Koyama et al. 2005)
G50LeafDestruxin B, Homodestruxin B, andAntibiotic PF 1052NMR, UV, and MS(Buchwaldt and Jensen 1991; Koyama et al. 2005)
Alternaria sp.G58LeafPyrenocines A and B,R-7-hydroxy-3-(S-1-hydroxyethyl)-5-methoxy-3,4-dimethylisobenzofuran-1(3H)-one, andR-4,8-dihydroxy-6-methoxy-4,5-dimethyl-3-methyleneisochroman-1-oneNMR, UV, and MS(Hashida et al. 2010; Tayone et al. 2011)
Aspergillus iizukae SugiyG77LeafMethyl asterrate,Methyl 2,4-dichloroasterrate,Dihydrogeodin,Bisdechlorogeodin,Antibiotic SS 19508D, andGeodinNMR, UV, and MS (Matsumoto et al. 1986; Tanaka et al. 1996; Hargreaves et al. 2002b; Sato et al. 2005; Lin et al. 2009)
Diaporthe sp.G111Seed(-)-α-tetrahydro-bisabolen-2,5,6-triolDereplication: UV, retention time, and MS(El-Elimat et al. 2013)
Thielavia sp.G323LeafThielavins B and CNMR, UV, and MS(Kitahara et al. 1983; Jang et al. 2014)
Penicillium sp.G324LeafO-Methyldihydrogladiolic acid,10,20-Dehydro[12,13-dehydroprolyl-2-(1,1-dimethylallyl)tryptophyl] diketopiperazine],12,13-dehydroprolyl-2-(1,1-dimethylallyltryptophyl) diketopiperazine, Deoxybrevianamide ENMR, UV, and MS(Steyn 1973; Ichihara et al. 1985)
Penicillium sp.G339LeafBisorbicillinolide,Bisvertinolone, andTrichodimerolNMR, UV, and MS(Trifonov et al. 1986; Andrade et al. 1992; Abe et al. 1998)
Myrothecium verrucaria (Alb. & Schwein.) DitmarG340LeafVerrucarin A,Verrucarin J,Verrucarin L acetate, andMyrochromanolNMR, UV, and MS(Tamm et al. 1972; Namikoshi et al. 2000; Liu et al. 2006)
Chaetomidium arxii BennyG341LeafDihydro-5-(hydroxyphenylmethyl)-2(3H)-furanoneNMR, UV, and MS(Hargreaves et al. 2002a)
Daldinia loculata (Lév) Sacc.G343 1,8-dimethoxynaphthaleneNMR, UV, and MS(Yang et al. 2008)
Fusarium sp.G344G345LeafLeafBeauvericinNMR, UV, and MS (Zhan et al. 2007)
Microascus nidicola (Microascales)G377LeafMonascuskaoliaone,Nigragillin,Asperazine,Fonsecin,Fonsecin B,Epi-pestalamide A (6)Campyrone A,Campyrone C,Carbonarone A, andMonascuskaoliaone B (4)NMR, UV, and MS(Caesar et al. 1969; Isogai et al. 1975; Varoglu et al. 1997; Zhang et al. 2007; Ding et al. 2008; Cheng et al. 2010; Shaaban et al. 2012; Mouafo Talontsi et al. 2013)
Alternaria sp.G378LeafAlternariol,9-O-methylalternariol, andAltenueneNMR, UV, and MS(Koch et al. 2005; Altemöller et al. 2006; de Souza et al. 2013)
Biscogniauxia mediterranea (De Not.) KuntzeG410Leaf(3R)-5-methylmellein,(3R,4R)-cis-4-hydroxy-5-methylmellein,Acuminatopyrone,Chlamydospordiol,Chlamydosporol (major:minor mixture of diastereomers), andCyclo-[L-Phe-L-Leu-L-Leu-L-Leu-L-Ile],Biscognin A (1)Biscognin B (3)NMR, UV, optical rotation, and MS(Okuno et al. 1986; Solfrizzo et al. 1994; Visconti et al. 1994; Li et al. 2004)
Biscogniauxia atropunctata (Schwein.) PouzarG411Leaf(3R)-5-methylmellein,(3R)-5-formylmellein,(3R)-6-methoxy-5-methylmellein, andCyclo-[L-Phe-L-Leu-L-Leu-L-Leu-L-Ile]NMR, UV, and MS(Anderson et al. 1983; Okuno et al. 1986; Li et al. 2004; Sumarah et al. 2008)
Penicillium sp.G412LeafPaeciloxocin A,Tenellic acid C,Purpactin C,Purpactin C′, andRadiclonic acidNMR, UV, and MS(Sassa et al. 1973; Seto et al. 1977; Nishida et al. 1991; Oh et al. 1999; Wen et al. 2010)
Morphological characteristics and identification of Biscogniauxia mediterranea (G410) Strain G410 was grown on PDA for 3 weeks. On PDA, the colony morphology resembled the description offered by Collado et al. (2001). Mycelium brown to reddish brown, mostly superficial to partly immersed; colony reverse pale brown to cinnamon. In our strain, the conidia were not produced abundantly. Based on the data obtained from ITS sequence, however, G410 was more closely related to Biscogniauxia mediterranea isolates sequenced by Sánchez-Ballesteros et al. (2000) than those generated by (Collado et al. 2001). This is interesting because ITS sequences from Sánchez’s study were generated from American collections of B. mediterranea, whereas those of Collado’s study were generated from European collections. It has been suggested that there is a high divergence between populations of B. mediterranea at both side of the Atlantic Ocean (Collado et al. 2001). The ITS sequences obtained from our strain G410 from the USA clustered with ITS sequences obtained from isolates of B. mediterranea in north, central, and south America (AF390413, AF390414, GQ377479, KF850388) as well as France (EF026134). Isolation of monascuskaoliaone B (4) and monascuskaoliaone (5) A defatted organic extract of Microascus nidicola (G377; 42 mg) was subjected to RP HPLC [gradient elution using MeCN:H2O (containing 0.1% HCOOH): 40–100% MeCN for 40 min; λ = 210 and 254 nm] using a YMC ODS-A column (250 × 20 mm) eluting at the same flow rate to afford monascuskaoliaone B (5; 0.87 mg, tR 9.5 min) and monascuskaoliaone (4; 1.01 mg, tR 25.5 min). A scaled-up fermentation extract of this isolate did not yield the above compounds, but instead, entirely different metabolites including epi-pestalamide A (6) were encountered as delineated in Table 2. Morphological characteristics and identification of Microascus nidicola (G377) Identification of strain G377 was based on the observation of cultural morphology as well as on micromorphological features. Based on its gross morphology, G377 showed a number of similarities to the genus Microascus Zukal (Barron et al. 1961) with close resemblance to M. nidicola Massee & E.S. Salmon (Abbott et al. 2002). These characters included black, globose to ovoid perithecia; peridial wall composed of textura angularis in surface view; evanescent asci; falcate to lunate ascospores (~5 × 2 µm); abundant perithecia produced on PDA media with orange to copper coloured ascospores produced in cirri at maturity (Barron et al. 1961; Malloch 1970; Abbott et al. 2002). Biscognin A (1): white powder; [α]25D ‒45 (c 0.11, CHCl3); UV/Vis (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 214 (3.2), 286 (3.4) nm; 1H NMR data (CDCl3; 400 MHz) δ 5.43 (s, 3-H), 4.04 (dq, J = 8.3, 6.2, H-8), 3.80 (s, 4-OMe), 2.85 (dq, J = 8.3, 7.1, H-7), 1.90 (s, 5-Me), 1.25 (d, J = 7.1, H3-9), 1.17 (d, J = 6.2, 7-Me); 13C NMR (CDCl3; 100 MHz) δ 171.0 (C-4), 164.6 (C-2), 162.1 (C-6), 108.1 (C-5), 87.9 (C-3), 69.8 (C-8), 56.2 (4-OMe), 42.7 (C-7), 21.4 (C-9), 15.0 (7-Me), 9.3 (5-Me); see Figure S2; heteronuclear multiple bond correlations (HMBCs) (H-# → C-#): H-3 → C-2 (wk), C-4, and C-5; H-7 → 7-Me, C-8, and C-9; H-8 → C-6 (wk), C-7 (wk), and 7-Me; 4-OMe → C-4; 5-MeC-4, C-5, and C-6; 7-MeC-6, C-7, and C-8; H3-9 → C-7 and C-8; HRESIMS obsd m/z 213.1126 [M + H]+ (calcd for C11H17O4, 213.1121); preparation and 1H NMR data for Mosher’s esters of 1 are in Figure S5. Biscognin B (2): white powder; UV/Vis (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 222 (3.4), 277 (3.5), 326 (3.5) nm; 1H NMR data (CDCl3; 400 MHz) δ 5.52 (s, 3-H), 3.96 (s, 4-OMe), 2.33 (s, 7-Me), 2.07 (s, 8-Me); 13C NMR (CDCl3; 100 MHz) δ (C-#) 169.0 (C-4), 166.9 (C-8a), 162.7 (C-7), 160.6 (C-2 or C-5), 156.9 (C-2 or C-5), 106.1 (C-8), 97.3 (C-4a), 88.0 (C-3), 57.2 (4-OMe), 18.3 (7-Me), 9.8 (8-Me); see Figure S3; HMBC correlations (H-# → C-#) H-3 → C-2, C-4, C-4a, and C-5; 4-OMe→ C-4; 7-MeC-7 and C-8; 8-MeC-7, C-8, and C-8a; HRESIMS obsd m/z 223.0602 [M + H]+ (calcd for C11H11O5, 223.0601). Monascuskaoliaone B (4): Colourless oil; [α]25D +30 (c 0.067, MeOH); UV/Vis (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 263 (3.4) nm; ECD (223 µM, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 256 (+13) nm; 1H NMR data (CDCl3; 700 MHz); δ 5.46 (s, 4-H), 3.93 (t, J = 6.2, H2-7), 3.49 (m, H-15), 2.76 (m, H2-6), 1.69 (m, H2-8), 1.49 (m, Hα-16), 1.41 (m, Hβ-16), 1.16‒1.48 m (m, H2-9 ‒ H2-14), 1.34 (s, 2-Me), 0.92 (t, J = 7.5, H3-17); 13C NMR (CDCl3; 175 MHz) δ 207.3 (C-3), 189.3 (C-5), 103.7 (C-4), 91.6 (C-2), 73.5 (C-15), 59.5 (C-7), 36.8 (C-8), 34.3 (C-6), 30.4 (C-16), 10.1 (C-17), Carbon NMR chemical shift for C-9‒C-14, could not be assigned with confidence but are listed here: δ 37.1, 29.56, 29.58, 29.4, 25.7, 23.1, 22.2; see Figure S4; Key HMBC correlations (H-# → C-#) 2- Me → C-2, C-3, and C-8; H-4 → C-2, C-3, and C-5; H2-6 → C-4, C-5, and C-7; H2-7 → C-5 and C-6; H3-17 → C-15 and C-16; HRESIMS obsd m/z 299.2213 [M + H]+ (calcd for C17H31O4, 299.2217); Preparation and 1H NMR data for Mosher’s esters of 4 are in Figure S5. Epi-pestalamide A (6): Yellow oil; [α]25D +15 (c 0.10, MeOH); 1H and 13C NMR data in (CD3)2CO were identical to those reported in literature (Ding et al. 2008).

Bioassay

The effect of pure compounds on viability of human prostate carcinoma PC-3 cells was determined by the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay, and growth inhibition was assessed as the percent cell viability wherein vehicle-treated cells were taken as 100% viable. Human prostate carcinoma PC-3 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulphate at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Briefly, PC-3 cells (2500 cells per well) were seeded in a 96-well plate, allowed to grow overnight, and then treated with 25 µM of each test compounds for 48 h. Cells treated with dimethyl sulphoxide served as vehicle control. Statistical analysis was carried out with Sigma Stat software version 2.03 (Jandel scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was used for multiple comparisons, and a statistically significant difference was considered at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Mycology

From 605 tissue samples, 41 isolates of endophytic fungi were recovered in culture. The total isolation frequency (the percent of tissue samples bearing cultivable endophytes) was 6.7%. The highest percentage of isolates was recovered from leaf tissue (16.5%) followed by root (3.6%), stems (1.9%), and seeds (1.4%). All of the fungal endophytes isolated from milk thistle belonged to the Ascomycota (Table 1; Figures S7 and S8).
Table 1.

List of 25 identified OTUs, GenBank accession numbers, their origin, and abundance. In most cases, isolates were grouped based on 98% ITS rDNA sequence similarity and identified using BLAST search.

OTU identificationSpecies identification of most homologous sequence from GenBank based on BLAST search*OTU numberStrain numbers/GenBank numbersOrigin/abundance
StemLeafRootSeed
Diaporthe sp.Diaporthe cotoneastri (NR 1197261)(OTU 1)G111 (KM215632) 1 1
Thielavia sp.Thielavia terricola (AJ271579)(OTU 2)G323 (KM215635) 1  
Penicillium sp.Penicillium hispanicum (JX841247)(OTU 3)G324 (KM215636) 1  
Cladosporium spCladosporium colombiae (NR_119729)(OTU 4)G325 (KM215637) 1  
Penicillium sp.Penicillium copticola (NR_1215161)(OTU 5)G339 (KM215638) 1  
Myrothecium verrucariaMyrothecium verrucaria (CBS 328.52; AJ302003)(OTU 6)G340 (KM215639) 1  
Chaetomidium arxiiChaetomidium arxii (JN709486)(OTU 7)G341 (KM215651) 1  
Daldinia loculataDaldinia loculata (AF176959)(OTU 8)G343 (KM215641) 1  
Zopfiella sp.Zopfiella longicaudata (GQ922541)(OTU 9)G367 (KM215644) 1  
Microascus nidicola #(OTU 10)G377 (KM215645) 1  
Trichophaea sp.Trichophaea hybrida (AF351582)(OTU 11)G78 (KM215630)/G379(KM215647)11  
Biscogniauxia mediterraneaBiscogniauxia mediterranea (AJ390413)(OTU 12)G410 (KM215652) 1  
Biscogniauxia atropunctataBiscogniauxia atropunctata (AJ390411)(OTU 13)G411 (KM215648) 1  
Penicillium sp.Penicillium aculeatum (AF033397)(OTU 14)G412 (KM215649) 1  
Talaromyces minioluteus #Talaromyces minioluteus (NR_121527.1)(OTU 15)G413 (KM215653) 1  
Nemania serpensNemania serpens (AJ390432)(OTU 16)G44 (KM215616)1   
Chaetomium spChaetomium rectangulare (HM365239)(OTU 17)G45 (KM215617)  1 
Penicillium sp.Penicillium restrictum (NR_121239)(OTU 18)G342 (KM215640)  1 
Alternaria sp.Alternaria metachromatica (AY762946)(OTU 19)G54 (KM215621)/G58(KM215625)/G59(KM215626)/G60(KM5215627)/G62(KM5215628)/G63(KM5215629) 6  
Alternaria sp.Alternaria eichhorniae (NR_111832)(OTU 20)G40 (KM215615)/G47(KM215618)/G48(KM215619)/G57(KM215624)/G378(KM215646) 4 1
Alternaria sp.Alternaria dauci ((NR_077186)(OTU 21)G49 (KM215620)/G50(KM215650)/G55(KM215622)/G56(KM215623) 4  
Fusarium sp.Fusarium fujikuroi (NR_111889)(OTU 22)G344 (KM215642)/G345(KM215643) 2  
Penicillium restrictum #Penicillium restrictum (NR_121239)(OTU 23)G85 (KF367458)1   
Acremonium sp.Acremonium sclerotigenum (FN706552)(OTU 24)G246 (KM215633)/G248(KM215634) 2  
Aspergillus iizukae #Aspergillus iizukae (EF669597)(OTU 25)G77 (AB859956)/G82(KM215631)11  

Notes: *Fungal endophyte OTUs were tentatively assigned to either genus or species by matching the most homologous sequences in GenBank by BLAST search. Where possible, only authentic sequences (RefSeq) were used for assigning OTUs preferentially from type or other authentic cultures generated by taxonomic specialist published in high impact factor Mycology journals. When multiple species were found to have high sequence similarity or when <98% sequence homology was found with a published authentic sequence for which a culture was deposited in a public culture collection, we choose to take a more conservative approach and use only the genus name for OTU assignment. Furthermore, most OTU identifications were corroborated via their higher level phylogenetic placement using a portion of partial LSU sequence (D1/D2 region) (see Fig S8, Supporting Information).

For OTU names followed by ‘#’ symbol, we used morphological characteristics of conidia or teleomorph formed in culture as well as sequence data from portions of partial LSU gene sequences (D1/D2) region and/or protein coding data in addition to ITS data in separately published studies by our research group to confirm OTU identification.

List of 25 identified OTUs, GenBank accession numbers, their origin, and abundance. In most cases, isolates were grouped based on 98% ITS rDNA sequence similarity and identified using BLAST search. Notes: *Fungal endophyte OTUs were tentatively assigned to either genus or species by matching the most homologous sequences in GenBank by BLAST search. Where possible, only authentic sequences (RefSeq) were used for assigning OTUs preferentially from type or other authentic cultures generated by taxonomic specialist published in high impact factor Mycology journals. When multiple species were found to have high sequence similarity or when <98% sequence homology was found with a published authentic sequence for which a culture was deposited in a public culture collection, we choose to take a more conservative approach and use only the genus name for OTU assignment. Furthermore, most OTU identifications were corroborated via their higher level phylogenetic placement using a portion of partial LSU sequence (D1/D2 region) (see Fig S8, Supporting Information). For OTU names followed by ‘#’ symbol, we used morphological characteristics of conidia or teleomorph formed in culture as well as sequence data from portions of partial LSU gene sequences (D1/D2) region and/or protein coding data in addition to ITS data in separately published studies by our research group to confirm OTU identification. Secondary metabolites isolated and/or identified from the selected endophytic fungal extracts of milk thistle.

ITS data

Based on 98% sequence similarity, 41 isolates were segregated into 25 OTUs (Figure S7; Table 1). The ITS alignment from representative isolates of fungal endophytes of milk thistle consisted of 870 nucleotides. The final ITS alignment, after the ambiguous regions were excluded, consisted of 436 nucleotides. The genera Penicillium, and Biscogniauxia were represented by more than one species.

LSU phylogeny of fungal endophytes from milk thistle and their phylogenetic affinities with the Ascomycota

The LSU ML tree shows the phylogenetic diversity of milk thistle fungal endophytes and their affinities to the members of the Ascomycota (Figure S8). These endophytes were associated with four major classes of Ascomycota (Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Leotiomycetes, and Sordariomycetes) (Figure S8). Within the Dothideomycetes, these endophytes (e.g., Alternaria sp. and Cladosporium sp.) showed phylogenetic affinities with the orders Pleosporales and Capnodiales. In the Eurotiomycetes, the milk thistle endophytes were nested within the Eurotiales and were represented by genera such as Penicillium and Aspergillus. The majority of the milk thistle endophyte isolates (35%) showed associations with the Sordariomycetes and were nested in diverse orders, including Diaporthales, Hypocreales, Microascales, Sordariales, and Xylariales. Only one isolate, Trichophaea sp., showed phylogenetic affinities with the Leotiales (Leotiomycetes) (Figure S8).

Chemistry

Sixty-two secondary metabolites, representing a variety of structural classes, including polyketides, terpenoids, peptides, and those of mixed biosynthetic origins, were isolated and characterized from extracts of solid-phase cultures of endophytic fungi from milk thistle (Table 2 and Figure 1). Fifty-eight of these compounds were known in the literature and have been previously encountered from other fungal species (Figure S1). Many of these metabolites have been reported to possess diverse biological activities.
Figure 1.

Structures of selected secondary metabolites identified from fungal endophytes of milk thistle and their biosynthetic classes.

Structures of selected secondary metabolites identified from fungal endophytes of milk thistle and their biosynthetic classes. The flavonolignans from milk thistle have received considerable attention in recent years for their role in prostate cancer chemoprevention (Davis-Searles et al. 2005; Agarwal et al. 2006). In cases where the compounds from milk thistle fungal endophytes were isolated in sufficient purity (>95% by UPLC and/or NMR), they were tested in vitro for cytotoxic activity against the human prostate carcinoma (PC-3) cell line (Figure S9). PC-3 cells were treated with 25 µM of each compound for 48 h and analysed in the MTT assay. Several compounds were found to exhibit moderate to strong cytotoxicity. Beauvericin, a cyclic hexadepsipeptide, was the most cytotoxic of all the evaluated metabolites (exhibiting 3% cell viability at 25 µM concentration) and has been reported in the literature to inhibit PC-3M cell proliferation/survival with an IC50 value of 3.8 µM (Zhan et al. 2007). Beauvericin has been shown to possess a variety of additional activities including entomopathogenic, antimicrobial, anticholesterolemic, and cytotoxic effects (Tomoda et al. 1992; Wang and Xu 2012). The antibiotic SS 19508D and a sample containing an inseparable major:minor (~10:1) mixture of euplectin and coneuplectin also showed significant cytotoxicity (~5% cell viability) in these assays. The biological activity of euplectin, originally isolated from Flavoparmelia euplecta (Ernst-Russell et al. 2000), has been evaluated against the murine P-815 mastocytoma cell line (IC50 1.67 µg/ml), but neither euplectin nor antibiotic SS 19508D has been tested previously against models of prostate carcinoma. Other secondary metabolites, such as bisdechlorogeodin, verrucarin A, and tyroscherin, were found to be moderately cytotoxic (10–25% cell viability). In addition to the known compounds, four new natural products [biscognin A (1), biscognin B (3), monascuskaoliaone B (4), and epi-pestalamide A (6)] were also obtained (Figure 2). Biscognin A (1) was assigned the molecular formula C11H16O4 on the basis of HRESIMS data, indicating an index of hydrogen deficiency of four. The 1H NMR spectrum showed signals for an olefinic proton, two methine protons (including an oxymethine signal), three methyl groups (a singlet and two doublets), and a methoxy group (Figure S2). All eleven carbons, including six sp- and five sp-hybridized carbons, were observed in the 13C NMR spectra. These signals closely resembled the data for a related compound, chlamydospordiol (2), which was also isolated as one of the major metabolites during investigation of the same endophytic fungus (G410). A set of mutually coupled diastereotopic protons (δ 4.52 and δ 4.29; J = 12.4 Hz), characteristic of an isolated oxymethylene unit in 2, was replaced by a methyl singlet at δ 1.90 (5-Me) in compound 1; this accounted for the only key difference in the 1H NMR spectra of the two compounds. A corresponding carbon signal (δ 9.3; 5-Me) was also observed in the 13C NMR spectrum of 1. HMBC correlations from 5-Me to C-4 (δ 171.0), C-5 (δ 108.1), and C-6 (δ 162.1) confirmed the position of this methyl group, and the remaining HMBC correlations were consistent with the structure shown for 1. The relative configuration at C-7 and C-8 could not be determined due to unsuccessful crystallization attempts limited by sample paucity as well as degradation over time. Mosher’s method (Hoye et al. 2007) was employed to independently assign the absolute configuration at C-8. However, esterification conditions resulted in the disappearance of the olefinic signal H-3 (δ 5.43) in the reaction product, suggesting that a modification of the ring system occurred during the reaction. Even so, the portion of the compound that contained the side chain appeared to remain intact, and the downfield chemical shift for H-8 (δ 5.17) in the reaction product compared with the δ 4.04 in 1 supported the formation of the acylated product. The measurable Δδ values (Figure S5) observed for key signals of the R- and S-esters were consistent with the assignment of the R-configuration at C-9.
Figure 2.

Structures of new secondary metabolites (1, 3, 4, and 6) and selected relevant analogues (2 and 5).

Structures of new secondary metabolites (1, 3, 4, and 6) and selected relevant analogues (2 and 5). Biscognin B (3) had the molecular formula C11H10O5 (seven unsaturations), suggesting a structural motif similar to compounds 1 and 2 but with noticeable differences in the NMR data. Only four singlets, corresponding to an olefinic proton, a methoxy group, and two methyl groups, were observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of 3 (Figure S3). The 13C NMR spectrum showed signals for eleven carbons, eight of which correlated to sp-hybridized carbons. The chemical shifts and HMBC correlations from H-3 to 4-OMe were indicative of a six-membered ring system identical to compounds 1 and 2. Both methyl doublets (7-Me and 8-Me) showed HMBC correlations of the olefinic carbons C-7 (δ 162.7) and C-8 (δ 106.1). An additional HMBC correlation from 8-Me to C-8a (δ 166.9) confirmed the positions of the methyl groups on carbons adjacent to each other (C-7 and C-8) and established the connectivity of C-8 to C-8a. Only a -CO2 unit and two unsaturations were unaccounted. A four-bond HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-5 (δ 160.6 or δ 156.9) and chemical shift for C-4a (δ 97.3) as well as C-7 (δ 162.7) were consistent with a lactone linkage to C-4a via the carbonyl. The molecular formula of monascuskaoliaone B (4) was determined to be C17H30O4 (three unsaturations) by HRESIMS. The 1H NMR spectrum exhibited signals for an olefinic proton, an isolated pair of mutually coupled methylene units, two methyl groups (singlet and triplet), and a cluster of aliphatic protons (Figure S4). A similar set of signals were also observed for a known natural product, monascuskaoliaone (5; molecular formula C17H30O3) that was also encountered during the course of our studies (Cheng et al. 2010). A comparison with the available literature data for 5 suggested an identical five-membered furan-derived ring system and a similar side chain at C-5 in the new metabolite 4. HMBC correlations from olefinic proton H-4 (δ 5.46) to C-2 (δ 91.6), C-3 (δ 207.3), and C-5 (δ 189.3) as well as from aliphatic H2-6 (δ 2.76) to C-4 (δ 103.7), C-5, and C-7 (δ 59.8) supported the analogous assignment of this partial structure. HMBC correlations from the methyl group singlet (δ 1.34) to C-2, C-3, and C-8 (δ 36.8) established the location of this unit alpha to the carbonyl group. In comparison to 5, key differences resided in chemical shifts for methylene protons of the decyl side chain and presence of an additional oxymethine signal (δ 3.49; H-15) in the 1H NMR spectrum of 4. An HMBC correlation from H3-17 (δ 0.92) to carbon C-15 (δ 73.5), as well as the multiplicity of H3-17 (triplet), was consistent with the placement of a hydroxyl group at C-15. The absolute configuration at C-15 was assigned as R- using the Mosher’s method (Hoye et al. 2007). Although both the primary and secondary alcohols were acylated on reaction with Mosher’s reagent, the distant location of the resulting ester groups was not expected to interfere with the assignment of absolute configuration at C-15. Due to extensive overlap in the 1H NMR signals for the aliphatic chain of 4, the only useful ΔδS-R value (+0.12) for H3-17 was employed for the above assignment (Figure S5). Monascuskaoliaone (5) was isolated originally from Monascus kaoliang as a racemic mixture (Cheng et al. 2010). However, optically active samples for 4 and 5 were obtained from the extract of Microascus nidicola (G377). Since both compounds possessed an α, β-unsaturated ketone chromophore, a comparison of the calculated and experimental ECD spectra for both enantiomers was employed to determine the absolute configuration at C-2. Positive Cotton effects observed for both compounds were consistent with the assignment of R-configuration at C-2 (Figure S6). These results were also supported by comparisons between calculated and experimental-specific rotation values (Figure S6). Epi-pestalamide A (6) had the molecular formula C18H17NO6 (eleven unsaturations). The 1H and 13C NMR data were identical to those reported for pestalamide A (Ding et al. 2008). However, comparison of the specific optical rotation values of 6 (+15) and pestalamide A (–12) suggested that 6 was an enantiomer of the reported compound.

Discussion

This is the first comprehensive study of fungal endophytes from Silybum marianum, a plant of the Asteraceae. However, there have been few previous studies that have screened endophytes from Asteraceous plants (Romero et al. 2001; Shipunov et al. 2008; Gallo et al. 2009). Several genera of endophytes isolated in the present study (Table 1), such as Aspergillus, Alternaria, Cladosporium, Diaporthe, Nemania, and Penicillium, were also isolated from achenes of an invasive spotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe (Shipunov et al. 2008). However, the species identities of the isolated fungi between S. marianum and C. stoebe were different. The genus Alternaria, isolated in this study, was also reported as an endophyte of Smallanthus sonchifolius (Asteraceae), which is a medicinal plant used for antidiabetic and antiinflammatory properties in Brazil, Japan, and the New Zealand (Gallo et al. 2009). The majority of the fungal endophytes isolated in the present study can be classified as non-clavicipitaceous (class 3 endophytes) based on their host colonization patterns, mechanism of transmission, ecological functions, and in planta biodiversity (Rodriguez et al. 2009). Most of these class 3 non-clavicipitaceous endophytes belong to the Ascomycota (Pezizomycotina) (Figures S7 and S8). In our study, the isolated class 3 endophytes largely belonged to the Sordariomycetes and Dothideomycetes (Figure S8). Isolation of endophytes from these lineages of fungi agrees well with those reported in previous studies on fungal endophytes (Arnold 2007; Arnold and Lutzoni 2007; Hoffman and Arnold 2008; Gazis and Chaverri 2010; Linnakoski et al. 2012). Despite screening 140 surface-sterilized milk thistle seeds, we only recovered 2 OTUs (Alternaria sp. and Diaporthe sp.) from the seeds. These fungi have been reported as endophytes previously from foliage of other plant species (Kurose et al. 2012; Douanla-Meli et al. 2013). Ganley and Newcombe (2006) found that only 2% of endophytes were recovered from 750 surface-sterilized seeds of Pinus monticola. Similarly, Arnold et al. (2003) were unsuccessful in obtaining endophytes from seeds of Theobroma cacao, while they found diverse endophytes associated with foliage of the same species. Conversely, Gallery et al. (2007) were able to recover ascomycetous endophytes from surface-sterilized seeds of a tropical tree (Cecropia insignis) using culture-independent methods, but failed to isolate fungi from seeds using culture-based methods. Thus, it is likely that seeds harbour a community of endophytes that may be more recalcitrant to culturing. Similarly, we isolated only two OTUs (Penicillium sp. G342 and Chaetomium sp. G45) from surface-sterilized roots fragments. This may be due to the fact that only 55 root fragments were plated. Members of Chaetomium sp. are commonly found in the soil (Soytong et al. 2001), and therefore it was not surprising to find it associated with roots of milk thistle. Chaetomium spp. have also been reported as endophytes of many different plants such as soybean (de Souza Leite et al. 2013), wheat (Syed et al. 2009), and Ginkgo biloba (Qin et al. 2009). Various endophytic Penicillium spp. have been reported in the past to be associated with roots; for example, in Picea mariana, about 30 different Penicillium spp. have been isolated (Stone et al. 2000). It is well known that endophytes may play a role in the growth and development of the host plant, in addition to providing protection against various sources, and are therefore potential sources of biologically active natural products (Strobel et al. 2004). Endophytic fungi inhabiting plants with a well-established ethnobotanical history represent a unique ecological group, since the medicinal effects of the plant could also be related to the resident endophytes (Kusari, Pandey, et al. 2013). In the last 10 years, there has been an upsurge of studies that have targeted fungal endophytes from medicinal plants for the isolation and characterization of novel metabolites (Wang et al. 2002; Tejesvi et al. 2006; Gomes-Figueiredo et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2008; Hyde and Soytong 2008; Naik et al. 2008; Krishnamurthy et al. 2009; Bills et al. 2012; Gond et al. 2012; Mishra et al. 2012; Vieira et al. 2012; Zubek et al. 2012; Miller, Qing, Sze, Neilan, et al. 2012; Aly et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2013; Ellsworth et al. 2013; Kusari, Kusari, et al. 2013). In the present study, we have isolated four new secondary metabolites [biscognin A (1), biscognin B (3), monascuskaoliaone B (4), and epi-pestalamide A (6)] from milk thistle endophytes, in addition to scores of known compounds that are members of a range of different classes of natural products. A plethora of biological activities for these compounds have been reported in the literature. As part of our screening programme that involves testing the isolated metabolites in the available assays, and in view of well-documented chemopreventive properties of plant metabolites of milk thistle, selected pure compounds from fungal endophytes were also evaluated for cytotoxicity against a human prostate carcinoma cell line. The new compounds (1, 3, and 6) were found to be inactive in this assay, and compound 4 was not tested due to paucity of sample. It is likely that the new compounds isolated from B. mediterranea, in this study, could have a more natural function such as being an insecticidal agent or an insect signal molecule (pheromone). For example, a study by Pažoutová et al. (2013) showed that new compounds from Daldinia hawksworthii isolated from Salix spp. and a symbiont of woodwasp, Xiphydria prolongata exhibited weak cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. The authors concluded that the compounds isolated from the Xylariaceous endophytes might have a more natural ecological function (Pažoutová et al. 2013). Thus, it would be interesting to test the bioactivity of biscognin A (1) and biscognin B (3) in the future as signalling molecules or insecticidal activity, since members of Xylariaceous endophytes from plants are linked to insects with respect to their life cycles (Bills et al. 2012). However, several compounds such as beauvericin, antibiotic SS 19508D, euplectin/coneuplectin (major:minor mixture), bisdechlorogeodin, verrucarin A, and tyroscherin exhibited moderate to strong cytotoxic activities (Figure S9). Most of these metabolites had not been examined previously in the PC-3 cell assay. Several cytotoxic compounds that could contribute to the chemopreventive properties of milk thistle extracts were encountered during this study. However, an assessment of the therapeutic role of endophytes is debatable, partly due to the sporadic distribution of these microorganisms, both within the plant and based on the geographical location. Such variations have been reported for fungal endophytes inhabiting other plants (Collado et al. 1999; Taylor et al. 1999; Göre and Bucak 2007). Furthermore, extensive studies are required to link the role of the endophytic metabolites to the biological activities displayed by plant compounds as well as their role in plant physiology. Even so, the above results provide an in-depth analysis of the chemical mycology of the fungal endophytes from milk thistle. Our study extends beyond other such surveys, where typically only the crude extracts were tested for bioactivity (de Siqueira et al. 2011; Zhao et al. 2011; Carvalho et al. 2012). In the present investigation, scores of compounds were isolated, characterized, and tested in the cytotoxicity assay.

Summary and conclusions

This is the first study that concurrently examined the chemistry and mycology of fungal endophytes from milk thistle. Our study, although based on a restricted geographical sampling, has demonstrated that fungal endophytes inhabit milk thistle leaves, stem, seed, and roots. Leaves harbour the most phylogenetically diverse fungal endophytes, belonging to four different classes in the Pezizomycotina, Ascomycota. Further sampling of milk thistle from other regions will likely yield more diverse fungal endophytes. Of the four new and 58 known secondary metabolites encountered during the course of this study, about 10% of pure compounds exhibited moderate to strong toxicity against PC-3 cells. Chemical investigations aimed at structure elucidation of other new natural products isolated from milk thistle fungal endophytes in addition to those discussed here are underway.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at 10.1080/21501203.2015.1009186.
  119 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products.

Authors:  Gary Strobel; Bryn Daisy
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Three new species of acanthostigma (Tubeufiaceae, Dothideomycetes) from Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

Authors:  Itthayakorn Promputtha; Andrew N Miller
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Diversity, host affinity, and distribution of seed-infecting fungi: a case study with Cecropia.

Authors:  Rachel E Gallery; James W Dalling; A Elizabeth Arnold
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Isolation and bioassay screening of medicinal plant endophytes from eastern Canada.

Authors:  Katelyn T Ellsworth; Trevor N Clark; Christopher A Gray; John A Johnson
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Cyclopentenones, scaffolds for organic syntheses produced by the endophytic fungus mitosporic dothideomycete sp. LRUB20.

Authors:  Porntep Chomcheon; Nongluksna Sriubolmas; Suthep Wiyakrutta; Nattaya Ngamrojanavanich; Narongsak Chaichit; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Somsak Ruchirawat; Prasat Kittakoop
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.050

7.  Cycloaspeptide A and pseurotin A from the endophytic fungus Penicillium janczewskii.

Authors:  Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann; Emilio Hormazabal; Jaime A Rodriguez; Cristina Theoduloz
Journal:  Z Naturforsch C J Biosci       Date:  2008 May-Jun

8.  Fungal endophytes in seeds and needles of Pinus monticola.

Authors:  Rebecca J Ganley; George Newcombe
Journal:  Mycol Res       Date:  2006-02-21

9.  Hypoxylon pulicicidum sp. nov. (Ascomycota, Xylariales), a pantropical insecticide-producing endophyte.

Authors:  Gerald F Bills; Victor González-Menéndez; Jesús Martín; Gonzalo Platas; Jacques Fournier; Derek Peršoh; Marc Stadler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Polyhydroxyanthraquinones as quorum sensing inhibitors from the guttates of Penicillium restrictum and their analysis by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mario Figueroa; Alan K Jarmusch; Huzefa A Raja; Tamam El-Elimat; Jeffrey S Kavanaugh; Alexander R Horswill; R Graham Cooks; Nadja B Cech; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.050

View more
  9 in total

1.  Secondary Metabolites from Fungal Endophytes of Echinacea purpurea Suppress Cytokine Secretion by Macrophage-Type Cells.

Authors:  Amninder Kaur; Martina Oberhofer; Monika Juzumaite; Huzefa A Raja; Travis V Gulledge; Diana Kao; Stanley H Faeth; Scott M Laster; Nicholas H Oberlies; Nadja B Cech
Journal:  Nat Prod Commun       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.986

Review 2.  Droplet probe: coupling chromatography to the in situ evaluation of the chemistry of nature.

Authors:  Nicholas H Oberlies; Sonja L Knowles; Chiraz Soumia M Amrine; Diana Kao; Vilmos Kertesz; Huzefa A Raja
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 13.423

3.  Antimicrobial fungal endophytes from the botanical medicine goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis).

Authors:  Joseph M Egan; Amninder Kaur; Huzefa A Raja; Joshua J Kellogg; Nicholas H Oberlies; Nadja B Cech
Journal:  Phytochem Lett       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  Talarolutins A-D: Meroterpenoids from an endophytic fungal isolate of Talaromyces minioluteus.

Authors:  Amninder Kaur; Huzefa A Raja; Dale C Swenson; Rajesh Agarwal; Gagan Deep; Joseph O Falkinham; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Biochemometrics for Natural Products Research: Comparison of Data Analysis Approaches and Application to Identification of Bioactive Compounds.

Authors:  Joshua J Kellogg; Daniel A Todd; Joseph M Egan; Huzefa A Raja; Nicholas H Oberlies; Olav M Kvalheim; Nadja B Cech
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  Dereplicating and Spatial Mapping of Secondary Metabolites from Fungal Cultures in Situ.

Authors:  Vincent P Sica; Huzefa A Raja; Tamam El-Elimat; Vilmos Kertesz; Gary J Van Berkel; Cedric J Pearce; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.050

7.  Biscogniauxone, a New Isopyrrolonaphthoquinone Compound from the Fungus Biscogniauxia mediterranea Isolated from Deep-Sea Sediments.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Jutta Wiese; Rolf Schmaljohann; Johannes F Imhoff
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.118

8.  Enhanced dereplication of fungal cultures via use of mass defect filtering.

Authors:  Noemi D Paguigan; Tamam El-Elimat; Diana Kao; Huzefa A Raja; Cedric J Pearce; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Spatial and Temporal Profiling of Griseofulvin Production in Xylaria cubensis Using Mass Spectrometry Mapping.

Authors:  Vincent P Sica; Evan R Rees; Edem Tchegnon; Robert H Bardsley; Huzefa A Raja; Nicholas H Oberlies
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.