Literature DB >> 26000092

Biguanides and targeted anti-cancer treatments.

Elyse K Hanly1, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz1, Raj K Tiwari1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26000092      PMCID: PMC4426946          DOI: 10.18632/genesandcancer.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Cancer        ISSN: 1947-6019


× No keyword cloud information.
Drug repositioning and molecularly targeted novel drug development are two contrasting strategies in cancer research. Yet, certain combinations of the two may bring together the best of both worlds. Drug repositioning, i.e. the use of a drug for treating diseases other than the drug-specified, is a strategy to advance patient care more quickly and efficiently. The idea was promoted in 2012 through the Discovering New Therapeutic Uses for Existing Molecules program, initiated by NIH. Several drugs used for other purposes have proved to be effective anti-cancer agents, including thalidomide, aspirin, and celecoxib. In contrast, novel drug development is a lengthy process. Molecularly tailored drugs fail for various reasons including inadequate bioavailability and adverse side effects, and are often very expensive. Despite drawbacks to targeted drug development, there are also successes in this area of research. Cancer therapeutics designed to inhibit kinases involved in cell growth and survival pathways are potent and selective in the short term. By directly blocking cell signaling, often at the source of over-activation, these drugs kill cancer cells. One example of success in targeted therapy is the development of BRAFV600E inhibitors, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, and their ability to prolong progression-free survival time in melanoma patients. However, a major problem with monotherapy is the inevitable development of resistance. Even with combination treatment using specific inhibitors, such as BRAFV600E and MEK inhibitors in melanoma, improvement in patient outcome is limited [1,2] and resistance emerges. There is increasing interest in combining targeted inhibitors with common metabolic regulators to hinder resistance. This unique combination reaps both the intrinsic benefits of repurposing drugs and the selectivity of targeted therapy. The major biguanides, metformin and phenformin, have known pharmacokinetics, high safety profiles, and are relatively inexpensive. Metformin in particular is widely used for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Although there is evidence in literature for both pro-cancer and anti-cancer effects of metformin on cancer cells, a clear association between metformin therapy and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients exists. Recent studies point out direct cellular benefits of combining biguanides with current targeted therapy. Biguanides in combination with targeted inhibitors synergistically reduced cell viability and inhibited tumor growth in BRAFV600E-positive and NRAS mutant melanoma cells [3,4]. In the latter case, even when the driver NRAS mutation was not targeted itself, inhibition of a downstream molecule was more effective when used in combination with metformin [4]. Another study determined that metformin and erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) induced apoptosis synergistically in a subset of basal-like breast cancer cells. Specifically, MDA-MB-468 cells treated with the combination had reduced expression of signaling molecules, increased apoptosis, and reduced clonogenicity and mammosphere formation [5]. Our current finding of the increased sensitivity of thyroid cancer cell lines to the cytotoxic activity of vemurafenib, when used in combination with metformin [6], provides further evidence of such synergism that can potentially be useful in cancer treatment. Molecular mechanisms accounting for biguanide-mediated potentiation of targeted inhibitors likely include pleiotropic effects from altering cancer cell metabolism and inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) molecule. Metformin transiently inhibits the mitochondrial respiratory-chain complex 1, causing decreased energy status, increased ratio of AMP:ATP, and subsequent activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which has many downstream targets. Overall, the cell's agenda changes to an energy-sparing, relatively anabolic state. There is evidence for metformin-mediated decreased fatty acid synthesis, inhibition of the unfolded protein response, and cell cycle arrest. Broad metabolic modifications may help to restrict development of resistance: less selective pressure deters bypass of a single inhibited molecule and multiple adaptations may be required for resistant cell survival. Our observation that rapamycin, like metformin, also enhances cancer cell sensitivity to vemurafenib [6] emphasizes the importance of mTOR signaling and expands the range of potential adjuvants to include direct and specific mTOR inhibitors. Inhibition of mTOR signaling reduces translation and inhibits cell growth and proliferation. In cancer cells, these actions oppose overactive growth-promoting signaling pathways that are often inhibited by targeted therapy. Inhibition of mTOR creates a further downstream block of growth signaling and may prevent resistance from developing through alternative upstream pathways. The idea of a convergence point of resistance was elucidated in a recent study, which found that resistance to targeted inhibitors was characterized by persistent formation of the eIF4F translation initiation complex in melanoma, colon, and thyroid cancer cells [7]. Furthermore, disruption of eIF4F complex formation in combination with targeted inhibitors caused synergistic cell death [7]. Since metformin decreases translation initiation through inhibition of mTOR, it could also evoke synergy through inhibition at the convergence point. Biguanide adjuvant therapy is a rationale and cost-effective strategy to improve upon outcomes in cancer patients treated with targeted therapies. Further investigation into effectiveness of this combination in vivo may lead to widespread treatment opportunities in the near future.
  6 in total

1.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma.

Authors:  Georgina V Long; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Helen Gogas; Evgeny Levchenko; Filippo de Braud; James Larkin; Claus Garbe; Thomas Jouary; Axel Hauschild; Jean Jacques Grob; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Celeste Lebbe; Mario Mandalà; Michael Millward; Ana Arance; Igor Bondarenko; John B A G Haanen; Johan Hansson; Jochen Utikal; Virginia Ferraresi; Nadezhda Kovalenko; Peter Mohr; Volodymyr Probachai; Dirk Schadendorf; Paul Nathan; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas; Douglas J DeMarini; Jhangir G Irani; Michelle Casey; Daniele Ouellet; Anne-Marie Martin; Ngocdiep Le; Kiran Patel; Keith Flaherty
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Authors:  James Larkin; Paolo A Ascierto; Brigitte Dréno; Victoria Atkinson; Gabriella Liszkay; Michele Maio; Mario Mandalà; Lev Demidov; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Luc Thomas; Luis de la Cruz-Merino; Caroline Dutriaux; Claus Garbe; Mika A Sovak; Ilsung Chang; Nicholas Choong; Stephen P Hack; Grant A McArthur; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Phenformin enhances the therapeutic benefit of BRAF(V600E) inhibition in melanoma.

Authors:  Ping Yuan; Koichi Ito; Rolando Perez-Lorenzo; Christina Del Guzzo; Jung Hyun Lee; Che-Hung Shen; Marcus W Bosenberg; Martin McMahon; Lewis C Cantley; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  eIF4F is a nexus of resistance to anti-BRAF and anti-MEK cancer therapies.

Authors:  Lise Boussemart; Hélène Malka-Mahieu; Isabelle Girault; Delphine Allard; Oskar Hemmingsson; Gorana Tomasic; Marina Thomas; Christine Basmadjian; Nigel Ribeiro; Frédéric Thuaud; Christina Mateus; Emilie Routier; Nyam Kamsu-Kom; Sandrine Agoussi; Alexander M Eggermont; Laurent Désaubry; Caroline Robert; Stéphan Vagner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Metformin and trametinib have synergistic effects on cell viability and tumor growth in NRAS mutant cancer.

Authors:  Igor Vujic; Martina Sanlorenzo; Christian Posch; Rosaura Esteve-Puig; Adam J Yen; Andrew Kwong; Aaron Tsumura; Ryan Murphy; Klemens Rappersberger; Susana Ortiz-Urda
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-01-20

6.  Metformin and erlotinib synergize to inhibit basal breast cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Ka Ingar Lau; Xing Du; Vinayak Rayannavar; Benjamin Hopkins; Jacquelyn Shaw; Eliana Bessler; Tiffany Thomas; Maira M Pires; Megan Keniry; Ramon E Parsons; Serge Cremers; Matthias Szabolcs; Matthew A Maurer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-11-15
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Buformin exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects in endometrial cancer cells.

Authors:  Joshua Kilgore; Amanda L Jackson; Leslie H Clark; Hui Guo; Lu Zhang; Hannah M Jones; Timothy P Gilliam; Paola A Gehrig; Chunxiao Zhou; Victoria L Bae-Jump
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Buformin suppresses proliferation and invasion via AMPK/S6 pathway in cervical cancer and synergizes with paclitaxel.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ling Chen; Qiuli Liu; Mei Tang; Yuan Wang; Jinjin Yu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Apoptotic impact on Brugia malayi by sulphonamido-quinoxaline: search for a novel therapeutic rationale.

Authors:  Priyanka S Bhoj; Rahul G Ingle; Kalyan Goswami; Lingaraj Jena; Shailesh Wadher
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.289

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.