| Literature DB >> 26000071 |
Mao-Chun Xu1, Xiu-Fang Gao2, Changwu Ruan1, Zhi-Ru Ge1, Ji-De Lu1, Jian-Jun Zhang1, Yu Zhang1, Lu Wang1, Hai-Ming Shi2.
Abstract
Oxidative stress plays a critical role in cardiovascular diseases. Salidroside, a glycoside from Rhodiola rosea, has been used as an antioxidative therapy for oxidative injury in cardiac diseases. However, the mechanism underlying its antioxidant effect needs to be elucidated. Treatment of HUVECs with H2O2 significantly decreased the expression of miR-103 in a dose- and time-dependent manner, whereas pretreatment with salidroside significantly inhibited this decrease. Subsequent analysis showed that overexpression of miR-103 abrogated cell activity and ROS production induced by H2O2. Bcl2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) was determined to be a novel miR-103 target in HUVECs. Interestingly, H2O2 treatment upregulated BNIP3 expression; in turn, this effect was inhibited by pretreatment with salidroside. Further studies confirmed that the knockdown of BNIP3 enhanced cell activity and suppressed the ROS production induced by H2O2. These results demonstrated for the first time that salidroside protects HUVECs in part by upregulating the expression of miR-103, which mediates BNIP3 downregulation and plays an important role in the cytoprotective actions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26000071 PMCID: PMC4427121 DOI: 10.1155/2015/489647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Salidroside mediated the expression of miR-103 in HUVECs induced by H2O2. (a) The expression of miR-103 was detected by qRT-PCR after H2O2 treatment at the indicated time points. (b) The expression of miR-103 was determined in HUVECs treated with the indicated concentration of H2O2 for 6 h. (c) HUVECs were treated with H2O2 alone or in combination with salidroside. The relative expression of miR-103 was detected by qRT-PCR. (d) qRT-PCR was used to assess the relative expression of miR-103 in HUVECs treated with or without salidroside. Data are shown as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01.
Figure 2Effect of miR-103 on HUVECs. (a) qRT-PCR was performed to verify the expression of miR-103 in HUVECs transfected with miR-103. (b) Effect of miR-103 on HUVEC viability induced by H2O2 was measured with the CCK-8 assay. (c) An apoptosis assay was performed to assess the apoptosis levels of HUVECs treated as indicated. (d) Effects of miR-103 on the intracellular formation of ROS triggered by preincubation exposure of HUVECs to H2O2 assessed by DCF assays. ∗∗ p < 0.01 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus H2O2 group.
Figure 3Validation of BNIP3 as a miR-103 target gene. (a) The 3′-UTR of BNIP3 and mutant 3′-UTR sequences that abolished binding. (b) Luciferase activity was assessed in HUVECs transfected with BNIP3 3′-UTR-WT or BNIP3 3′-UTR-MUT and the mimic control or miR-103. (c) Luciferase activity was assessed in HUVECs transfected with BNIP3 3′-UTR-WT or BNIP3 3′-UTR-MUT and the inhibitor control or miR-103 inhibitor. (d) BNIP3 mRNA levels analyzed by qRT-PCR. (e) Western blot analysis of the endogenous expression of BNIP3 upon forced expression of miR-103. (f) The protein expression of BNIP3 in HUVECs transfected with the miR-103 inhibitor or inhibitor control was determined by western blotting. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01.
Figure 4H2O2 upregulated the expression of BNIP3 in HUVECs. (a) BNIP3 protein expression in HUVECs cultured in 200 μM H2O2 for different time periods (left). Quantification of BNIP3 by band densitometry analysis (right). (b) BNIP3 protein expression in HUVECs cultured with H2O2 at the indicated concentration for 6 h (left). Quantification of BNIP3 by band densitometry analysis (right). (c) Western blot analysis of BNIP3 protein expression in HUVECs pretreated with or without salidroside and induced by H2O2. (d) Western blot analysis of BNIP3 protein expression in HUVECs stably expressing miR-103 treated with H2O2. GAPDH was used as the loading control. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01.
Figure 5Cell viability and DCF analysis of HUVECs exposed to H2O2 with or without BNIP3 knockdown. (a) Western blot analysis showing levels of BNIP3 when HUVECs were transfected with different BNIP3 siRNA constructs or a negative control (NC) siRNA. (b) The CCK-8 assay was performed to evaluate the cell viability of HUVECs treated as indicated. (c) An apoptosis assay was used to assess the apoptosis levels of HUVECs treated as indicated. (d) Intracellular formation of ROS was measured in HUVECs treated as indicated. (e) BNIP3 expression was determined in HUVECs transfected with siRNA and treated with or without H2O2. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 versus control and # p < 0.05 versus H2O2 group.