| Literature DB >> 25999951 |
Mark S Pearson1, Luke Becker1, Patrick Driguez2, Neil D Young3, Soraya Gaze4, Tiago Mendes5, Xiao-Hong Li6, Denise L Doolan2, Nicholas Midzi7, Takafira Mduluza8, Donald P McManus2, R Alan Wilson9, Jeffrey M Bethony10, Norman Nausch11, Francisca Mutapi11, Philip L Felgner12, Alex Loukas1.
Abstract
Schistosoma haematobium affects more than 100 million people throughout Africa and is the causative agent of urogenital schistosomiasis. The parasite is strongly associated with urothelial cancer in infected individuals and as such is designated a group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Using a protein microarray containing schistosome proteins, we sought to identify antigens that were the targets of protective IgG1 immune responses in S. haematobium-exposed individuals that acquire drug-induced resistance (DIR) to schistosomiasis after praziquantel treatment. Numerous antigens with known vaccine potential were identified, including calpain (Smp80), tetraspanins, glutathione-S-transferases, and glucose transporters (SGTP1), as well as previously uncharacterized proteins. Reactive IgG1 responses were not elevated in exposed individuals who did not acquire DIR. To complement our human subjects study, we screened for antigen targets of rhesus macaques rendered resistant to S. japonicum by experimental infection followed by self-cure, and discovered a number of new and known vaccine targets, including major targets recognized by our human subjects. This study has further validated the immunomics-based approach to schistosomiasis vaccine antigen discovery and identified numerous novel potential vaccine antigens.Entities:
Keywords: drug-induced resistance; human; protein microarray; schistosomiasis; vaccine
Year: 2015 PMID: 25999951 PMCID: PMC4419842 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Characterization of study cohort and sub-cohort used for the study described herein. *Treatment efficacy was assessed by urinalysis 6 weeks after praziquantel therapy – all subjects were egg-negative (no eggs found in any of three urine samples, each collected on a separate day). ∧Subjects remained in the endemic study area and had regular water contact for the study duration.
Figure 2Antibody responses to arrayed antigens differ in . (A) IgG1. (B) IgE. Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting the antibody response to each reactive antigen are shown for the drug-induced resistant (DIR) cohort before and after praziquantel treatment. The dashed and solid lines are the respective cut-offs for IgG1 (8239) and IgE (1861) reactivity, calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3IgG1 antibody profiles to arrayed antigens differ between . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG1 antibody responses to each reactive antigen are shown for the drug-induced resistant (DIR) and chronically infected (CI) cohorts after praziquantel treatment. Boxed antigens indicate homologs of known vaccine candidates. The dashed line is the cut-off for IgG1 reactivity (8239), calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Arrayed proteins significantly reactive to .
| Array ID (GenBank accession number) | Description | Reactivity difference | Frequency of recognition (%) | Therapeutic use | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GenBank accession number | Description/aa homology | Length (aa) | TM domains | |||||
| AY810792 | Butylcholinesterase ( | 6.97 × 10−6 | 100 | MS3_01257 | Acetylcholinesterase; 86% | 745 | 1 | IgG to |
| AY812951 | Mastin ( | 7.10 × 10−6 | 90 | MS3_04920 | Plasminogen; 70% | 492 | 1 | |
| AY815196 | Similar to NM_079585 tetraspanin 86D in | 1.40 × 10−5 | 50 | MS3_02232 | Tetraspanin-33; 81% | 259 | 4 | Vaccination with members of this family ( |
| AY815945 | SJCHGC09124 protein ( | 2.29 × 10−5 | 100 | MS3_10649 | Hypothetical protein; 73% | 141 | 3 | |
| AY809911 | SJCHGC02149 protein ( | 3.06 × 10−5 | MS3_07405 | Hypothetical protein; 87% | 574 | 1 | ||
| C609117.1 | Succinate dehydrogenase ( | 1.37 × 10−4 | 100 | MS3_03684 | Succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b560 subunit, mitochondrial; 93% | 379 | 2 | |
| AY815690 | Myosin-7 ( | 2.25 × 10−4 | 80 | MS3_09744 | Ribosome-binding protein 1; 90% | 775 | 0 | |
| AY812591 | SJCHGC04069 protein ( | 4.25 × 10−4 | 100 | MS3_01313 | Hypothetical protein (RNA binding); 71% | 392 | 0 | |
| AY222868 | SJCHGC06654 protein ( | 4.45 × 10−4 | 90 | MS3_04717 | Large subunit ribosomal protein; 48% | 150 | 1 | |
| AY808953 | Zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 3 ( | 0.0023 | 100 | MS3_10292 | Hypothetical protein; 41% | 201 | 0 | |
| AY814497 | SJCHGC02432 protein ( | 0.0027 | 100 | MS3_04817 | Hypothetical protein; 58% | 351 | 0 | |
| AY814261 | Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 5 ( | 0.0033 | 90 | MS3_08684 | Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 5; 67% | 452 | 1 | Suppression of |
| AY816000 | Cytochrome b-561 ( | 0.0081 | 60 | MS3_10028 | Cytochrome b-561; 85% | 242 | 6 | |
| AY815303 | Similar to microsomal glutathione | 0.0099 | 50 | MS3_02176 | Microsomal glutathione | 151 | 3 | A member of this protein family ( |
| AY810700 | Solute carrier family 2 protein ( | 0.0100 | 50 | MS3_02545 | Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1; 85% | 522 | 12 | Suppression of |
| AY812972 | SJCHGC02374 protein ( | 0.0106 | 60 | MS3_11481 | Hypothetical protein; 90% | 71 | 0 | |
| AY814817 | SJCHGC06849 protein ( | 0.0130 | 90 | MS3_05945 | Hypothetical protein (TATA-box binding); 71% | 416 | 0 | |
| AY815056 | SJCHGC06191 protein ( | 0.0155 | 80 | MS3_07473 | Hypothetical protein; 91% | 215 | 4 | |
| AY814977 | Nervana 2 ( | 0.0381 | 70 | MS3_03655 | Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-2; 87% | 293 | 1 | Suppression of |
| AY814430 | Calpain ( | 0.0497 | 100 | MS3_02003 | Calpain; 83% | 2028 | 0 | |
| AY815838 | SJCHGC05998 protein ( | 1.18 × 10−8e, 2.29 × 10−8f | 100 | N/A | ||||
| AY812161 | UPF05056 protein ( | 8.72 × 10−4 e, 1.02 × 10−6f | 100 | N/A | ||||
| AY815056 | SJCHGC06191 protein ( | 5.80 × 10−8e, 2.36 × 10−4f | 100 | N/A | ||||
| AY810700 | Solute carrier family 2 protein ( | 0.0071 | 33 | N/A | Suppression of | |||
| AY812195 | Extracellular superoxide dismutase (Cu–Zn) ( | 0.0071 | 83 | N/A | ||||
| AY814158 | Major egg antigen (p40) ( | 0.0444 | 67 | N/A | ||||
| AY808379 | SJCHGC09517 protein ( | 0.0454 | 17 | N/A | ||||
| AY09526 | SJCHGC09219 protein ( | 0.0504 | 67 | N/A | ||||
.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 4Some arrayed antigens that induce IgG1 responses in . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG1 and IgE antibody responses to each IgG1 antigen reactive to post-treatment sera from drug-induced resistant (DIR) humans. The dashed and solid lines are the respective cut-offs for IgG1 (8239) and IgE (1861) reactivity, calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Schistosoma japonicum SEA is included for comparative purposes.
Figure 5Gene transcription in the adult and egg stages of . Data were assembled from publicly available RNA-seq databases (43). These data were filtered for quality (PHRED score of >30) using Trimmomatic (8) and aligned to the open reading frames of the published gene set (7) using Bowtie (v2.1.0) (9). Normalized levels of gene transcription were calculated using the software package RSEM (v1.2.11) (10) and reported as the numbers of transcripts per million reads sequenced (TPMs). The TPM value of each gene was log2-transformed and subjected to heat map visualization using R.
Figure 6IgG antibody profiles to arrayed antigens differ in . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG antibody responses to each significantly reactive antigen are shown at baseline (0 weeks), 12 weeks post-infection, and elimination (20 weeks post-infection). The dashed line is the cut-off for IgG reactivity (3210), calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 7Different disease models of schistosomiasis resistance show common IgG responses to some arrayed antigens. Venn diagram depicting common IgG reactive proteins between Schistosoma haematobium-infected humans from an endemic area in Africa who acquire drug-induced resistance (DIR) after praziquantel treatment, Schistosoma japonicum-infected self-curing rhesus macaques, and Schistosoma mansoni-infected humans from an endemic area of Brazil who are naturally resistant (PRs). *Data from Gaze et al. (20); %IgG1 response to AY812195 is significantly different between DIRs before and after praziquantel treatment but not between DIRs and CIs post-treatment; #AY814977 and Smp_124240 are the respective S. japonicum and S. mansoni orthologs of SNaK1β. ∧We believe the sequence represented by AY815690 [“myosin-7” (S. japonicum)] has been incorrectly annotated due to its high degree of homology with other parasite orthologs of ribosome-binding protein 1 and lack of BlastP hits with any form of myosin.