Literature DB >> 25999951

Of monkeys and men: immunomic profiling of sera from humans and non-human primates resistant to schistosomiasis reveals novel potential vaccine candidates.

Mark S Pearson1, Luke Becker1, Patrick Driguez2, Neil D Young3, Soraya Gaze4, Tiago Mendes5, Xiao-Hong Li6, Denise L Doolan2, Nicholas Midzi7, Takafira Mduluza8, Donald P McManus2, R Alan Wilson9, Jeffrey M Bethony10, Norman Nausch11, Francisca Mutapi11, Philip L Felgner12, Alex Loukas1.   

Abstract

Schistosoma haematobium affects more than 100 million people throughout Africa and is the causative agent of urogenital schistosomiasis. The parasite is strongly associated with urothelial cancer in infected individuals and as such is designated a group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Using a protein microarray containing schistosome proteins, we sought to identify antigens that were the targets of protective IgG1 immune responses in S. haematobium-exposed individuals that acquire drug-induced resistance (DIR) to schistosomiasis after praziquantel treatment. Numerous antigens with known vaccine potential were identified, including calpain (Smp80), tetraspanins, glutathione-S-transferases, and glucose transporters (SGTP1), as well as previously uncharacterized proteins. Reactive IgG1 responses were not elevated in exposed individuals who did not acquire DIR. To complement our human subjects study, we screened for antigen targets of rhesus macaques rendered resistant to S. japonicum by experimental infection followed by self-cure, and discovered a number of new and known vaccine targets, including major targets recognized by our human subjects. This study has further validated the immunomics-based approach to schistosomiasis vaccine antigen discovery and identified numerous novel potential vaccine antigens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug-induced resistance; human; protein microarray; schistosomiasis; vaccine

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999951      PMCID: PMC4419842          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

The carcinogenic blood fluke, Schistosoma haematobium, infects more than 100 million people throughout Africa and is the most prevalent of the human schistosomes, causing more than half of all infections (1). S. haematobium adult flukes migrate to the vasculature of the organs of the pelvis. Severe morbidity results from host immune responses to eggs in tissues and includes periportal fibrosis, portal hypertension, and hepato-splenic disease (2). Formerly known as urinary schistosomiasis, S. haematobium infection was recently renamed “urogenital schistosomiasis” in recognition that the disease affects both the urinary and genital tracts of women and men. Female S. haematobium lay between 20 and 200 eggs daily (3), which penetrate the vessel wall and move toward the lumen of the bladder. Some of the eggs become sequestered in the tissue of the pelvic organs such as the urinary bladder, ureters, cervix, vagina, prostate gland, and seminal vesicles, where they cause chronic inflammation, pelvic pain, bleeding, and an altered cervical epithelium in women (4). S. haematobium is unique among the schistosomes in its recognition as a group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer because of its robust association with urothelial carcinoma (5). S. haematobium infection also increases susceptibility to infection with HIV-1, progression to disease, and results in a higher likelihood of transmitting infection to others (6). Praziquantel (PZQ) is widely used to treat human schistosome infections and has two main effects on schistosomes – paralysis and tegument damage (7). An added benefit of PZQ treatment is that it mediates destruction of flukes thereby exposing antigens on the worm surface to the host immune system. This release of surface antigens induces and/or enhances parasite-specific immune responses (8), resulting in immune-mediated killing of the parasite. Early studies reported modifications in T-cell proliferative responses (9), whereas recent studies noted modifications in the levels and types of antibody (10–13) and cytokine responses (14–16) following PZQ treatment. The immune response triggered by PZQ treatment is thought to last for more than 1 year (14, 17–19) and confer at least some level of resistance to re-infection. This phenomenon is referred to as “drug-induced resistance” (DIR) (20). The mechanisms behind DIR differ significantly from those of putative natural resistance (PR, resistant individuals who have not received PZQ therapy) and can be related to the origin (developmental stage) and concentration of the released antigen, as well as the type of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) involved. PZQ treatment introduces a large amount of adult fluke antigen directly into the bloodstream as a result of many worms dying at once (21), whereas naturally acquired resistance in the absence of PZQ treatment (PR) is stimulated by the introduction of smaller quantities of adult antigen due to a more gradual worm death. The process of PR is additionally stimulated by the release of antigens from naturally dying larval schistosomes (schistosomula) primarily through the skin and pulmonary vasculature, thus inducing different APCs and resulting in different interactions between the antigens and the immune system (22). This additional stimulus does not appear to factor significantly in DIR due to the ineffectiveness of PZQ against schistosomula (7, 8). Whatever the mechanism, it is important that an antigen threshold is reached in order to sufficiently stimulate anti-schistosome immunity (23, 24). Studies with car washers in schistosome-infected waters of Lake Victoria in Kenya showed that a subset of the men developed resistance to re-infection after PZQ therapy while others remained susceptible despite treatment (25, 26). It was found that IgE production to soluble worm antigen preparation (SWAP) paralleled the development of resistance, and did not occur in those who remained susceptible to re-infection (25). Additionally, our own immuno-proteomic studies have used S. haematobium SWAP to identify a number of antigens that are released by PZQ treatment and/or are the target of DIR immune responses (27, 28). However, despite the power of these proteomic studies in identifying individual parasite proteins, the utilization of SWAP (where worms are homogenized and solubilized under native conditions in the absence of detergents that will solubilize the cell membranes) does not result in full representation of the S. haematobium proteome. Indeed, numerous abundantly expressed proteins with multiple membrane spanning domains that are released from the tegument with detergents (29, 30) are accessible to chemical labeling on the surface of live worms (30), are recognized by sera from PR individuals, and are lead vaccine antigens against schistosomiasis (31–33). A third mechanism of resistance to schistosomiasis is seen in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). It is unique among animal models of schistosomiasis in that, once an infection reaches patency, worm death starts to occur from week 10 (34) and egg output diminishes over time until the infection is eliminated (35, 36). This phenomenon only occurs above a threshold worm burden (35, 36), presumably as sufficient immune stimulus is required for this process to occur (23, 24). This self-cure mechanism is thought to be antibody-mediated because of a strong inverse association between the rapidity and intensity of the IgG response and the number and morphology of surviving worms (34). Two-dimensional immunoblotting of worm extracts showed the immune response to be directed at gut digestive enzymes, tegument surface hydrolases, and anti-oxidant enzymes (34). The use of protein microarrays to profile the immune response to pathogens has become widespread over recent years and offers significant advantages over the conventional immuno-proteomic approaches described above. In parasitology, protein array studies have been used extensively in malaria (37) to compare antibodies from un-protected and protected subjects, identifying the antibodies (and their cognate antigens) that confer immunity (38–40). For schistosomes (37), similar studies have profiled antibody responses in S. japonicum- and S. mansoni-infected rodents (41, 42) and human subjects who are naturally resistant or susceptible to S. mansoni (20). Based on the success of our previous immunomics approach which analyzed antibody signatures of PR and chronically infected (CI) individuals from an S. mansoni-endemic area of Brazil (20), we decided to use the same experimental approach to identify antigens which are the targets of humoral immune responses in (1) DIR human subjects from an S. haematobium-endemic area in Africa and (2) rhesus macaques that had undergone self-cure after experimental S. japonicum infection. Given the extensive similarities in protein-coding gene sequences between the three major human schistosomes (86–92%) (43), as well as the extensive recognition of S. japonicum proteins on our array by sera from S. mansoni-infected individuals (20), we reasoned that sera from S. haematobium-infected individuals would strongly recognize many of the arrayed S. mansoni and S. japonicum proteins. Moreover, these cross-reactive antigens would potentially form the basis of a pan-schistosome vaccine that protects against all three human species. Leveraging existing protein arrays from our previous study, which contain antigens primarily from the antibody-accessible teguments of the adult fluke and the immunologically vulnerable schistosomulum stage, we show that DIR individuals and self-curing rhesus macaques make robust antibody responses to a number of tegument-associated proteins, including novel and previously described schistosome vaccine candidates.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

Ethical and institutional approval was granted by the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe and the University of Zimbabwe Institutional Review Board. Local permission for the study was granted by the Provincial Medical Director. The study design, aims, and procedures were explained in the local language, Shona, prior to enrollment. Participants were free to drop out of the study at any time and informed written consent was obtained from all participants prior to taking part in the study and to receiving anthelmintic treatment. As routine, all participants were offered treatment with the standard dose of PZQ (40 mg/kg) at the end of the study. All work involving experimental procedures with Rhesus macaques was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (ID: SYDW-2011017).

Study cohort

The study participants were residents of a S. haematobium-endemic rural village in Murewa in the Mashonaland East Province of Zimbabwe (31°94′E; 17°67′S). The village was selected because health surveys regularly conducted in the region showed little or no infection with soil-transmitted helminths (STH) and a low S. mansoni prevalence (<2%). Serum samples were provided from a cohort of S. haematobium-infected individuals (n = 106) aged 5–14 years who had never been treated with PZQ prior to this study and were free from co-infection with other helminths, Plasmodium, and HIV (14, 44). At the start of the study (baseline), subjects who were positive for S. haematobium eggs (at least one egg found in at least one of three urine samples, each collected on a separate day) following urinalysis were treated with PZQ by weight (40 mg/kg) and then assessed by urinalysis at 6 weeks to confirm clearance of the infection (no eggs found in any of three urine samples, each collected on a separate day). Individuals were followed for 18 months and maintained regular water contact throughout this period. Subjects were assessed for infectivity with S. haematobium at 6 months and at the end of the study. Individuals who were egg-positive at 18 months post-treatment (n = 32) were deemed CI and those who were egg-negative (n = 74) were categorized as DIR (Figure 1). Serum samples were obtained from both 0- and 18-month timepoints.
Figure 1

Characterization of study cohort and sub-cohort used for the study described herein. *Treatment efficacy was assessed by urinalysis 6 weeks after praziquantel therapy – all subjects were egg-negative (no eggs found in any of three urine samples, each collected on a separate day). ∧Subjects remained in the endemic study area and had regular water contact for the study duration.

Characterization of study cohort and sub-cohort used for the study described herein. *Treatment efficacy was assessed by urinalysis 6 weeks after praziquantel therapy – all subjects were egg-negative (no eggs found in any of three urine samples, each collected on a separate day). ∧Subjects remained in the endemic study area and had regular water contact for the study duration. For this study, we selected a subset of subjects as follows: CI subjects that had the highest post-treatment egg burdens (eggs/10 ml 10–104; n = 10) and DIR subjects that had some of the highest egg burdens at baseline (eggs/10 ml 44–743; n = 10), reasoning that these individuals represented extremities of the DIR and CI spectrums and therefore would maximize the likelihood of identifying differences in antibody signatures between CIs and DIRs. Subject ages (in years) were as follows: CIs (5, 8, 8, 9, 10, 10, 11, 11, 12, 14), range = 5–14, mean = 9.8, median = 10; DIRs (6, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11, 12), range = 6–12, mean = 8.9, median = 8.5.

Infection of self-curing rhesus macaques

The study used six captive-bred adult male rhesus macaques (M. mulatta; mean age 9.67 ± 0.82 years, mean weight 7.98 ± 0.85 kg) from the Kunming Primate Research Center, CAS. Macaques were group-housed prior to the experiment but then singly after infection for fecal sampling. Cercariae of S. japonicum were shed from patent snails (Oncomelania hupensis) provided by the Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases (Wuxi, China), collected from the water surface using a bacteriological loop and placed on glass cover slips for infection. Rhesus macaques anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride (6 mg/kg body weight, Gutian Pharmaceutical Corporation, Fujian, China) were infected percutaneously with 600 cercariae via the shaved abdominal skin for 30 min. Blood was obtained by intravenous sampling prior to infection (week 0) and at 12 and 20 weeks after exposure. Elimination of infection was confirmed at week 20 by assessment of eggs per gram of feces using both the Percoll technique (45) and Kato-Katz method (46).

Probing of protein microarrays with human and macaque sera

Protein microarrays were leveraged from a previous study by us (20) and contained both S. mansoni (n = 45) and S. japonicum (n = 172) proteins which were either (1) known or predicted to be localized to the tegument and/or (2) expressed in the schistosomulum (41), which is vulnerable to immune attack. Human IgG1 and IgE responses to antigens were determined by probing arrays with sera as previously described (20). Macaque antibody responses were determined by probing of arrays with sera as described for human sera with the exception that a goat anti-monkey IgG-biotin (1:500) (Sigma) secondary antibody was used.

Protein array data analysis and bioinformatics

Array data analysis was conducted using the “group average” method (20), where the mean signal intensity (SI) of the negative control (empty vector) spots for all sera were subtracted from the SI of each protein spot. The following reactivity cut-offs (calculated as one standard deviation above the negative control spots for all groups) were used: human IgG1 – 8239; human IgE – 1861; macaque IgG – 3210. Statistical analyses (Student’s t-test) were conducted with Graphpad Prism 6 to determine significant differences between samples for a given reactive protein. The transcription of genes in the adult and egg stages of S. haematobium was assessed for S. haematobium orthologs of all arrayed S. mansoni and S. japonicum proteins that were the targets of significantly different IgG responses between DIR and CI post-treatment sera using publicly available RNA-seq data (43). These data were filtered for quality (PHRED score of >30) using Trimmomatic (47) and aligned to the open reading frames of the published gene set (43) using Bowtie (v2.1.0) (48). Normalized levels of gene transcription were calculated using the software package RSEM (v1.2.11) (49) and reported as the numbers of transcripts per million reads sequenced (TPMs). The TPM value of each gene was log2-transformed and subjected to heat map visualization using R (v3.1.2), and utilizing the heatmap.plus (v1.3) package.

Results

Antibody signatures of DIR human subjects differ before and after PZQ treatment

To investigate the difference in antibody responses to arrayed antigens of the DIR cohort before and after PZQ treatment (therefore identifying antigens which are putatively exposed by drug therapy), sera from this group at baseline and 18 months after drug therapy were used to probe protein microarrays. IgG1 responses were significantly higher in DIRs at 18 months post-treatment compared to baseline for all 24 reactive proteins. Antigens which were the target of the most significantly different (p < 0.0001) responses pre- and post-drug treatment included AY810700 (glucose transporter), AY815303 [glutathione-S-transferase (GST)], and AY809911 (Ig domain-containing, sensory guidance protein) (Figure 2A). In contrast, IgG1 responses of the CI cohort to reactive proteins before and after PZQ treatment were not significantly different for any protein (data not shown). Additionally, IgE responses in the DIR group were significantly lower at 18 months post-PZQ treatment compared to baseline for the majority (78%) of the 18 reactive antigens (Figure 2B). Arrayed antigens that were the targets of IgE in post-treatment DIRs included AY814430 (calpain), AY812195 [extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD)], and AY814497 (Na+/K+ ATPase β subunit – SNaK1β).
Figure 2

Antibody responses to arrayed antigens differ in . (A) IgG1. (B) IgE. Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting the antibody response to each reactive antigen are shown for the drug-induced resistant (DIR) cohort before and after praziquantel treatment. The dashed and solid lines are the respective cut-offs for IgG1 (8239) and IgE (1861) reactivity, calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Antibody responses to arrayed antigens differ in . (A) IgG1. (B) IgE. Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting the antibody response to each reactive antigen are shown for the drug-induced resistant (DIR) cohort before and after praziquantel treatment. The dashed and solid lines are the respective cut-offs for IgG1 (8239) and IgE (1861) reactivity, calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

IgG1 profiles differ between S. haematobium-infected humans who do and do not acquire DIR after PZQ treatment

In order to analyze changes in antibody signatures to arrayed antigens related to the acquisition of DIR (thereby identifying proteins which are potential inducers of a protective antibody response), arrays were interrogated with sera from post-treatment CIs and DIRs and probed for IgG1 reactivity. IgG1 responses were significantly elevated in DIRs compared to CIs at 18 months to 20 of the 24 (83%) reactive proteins. The three antigens that were targets of the most significantly different (p < 0.0001) IgG1 responses were AY810792 (butylcholinesterase), AY812951 (mastin), and AY815196 [a homolog of human tetraspanin (TSP)-33] (Figure 3). Homologs and/or family members of known schistosome vaccine candidates such as calpain (50) (AY814430), a 28-kDa GST – Sh28GST (51) (AY815303), and the TSPs Sm-TSP-1 and Sm-TSP-2 (33, 52) (AY815196) were also identified. Table 1 lists all of the antigens depicted in Figure 3 along with their S. haematobium orthologs as we reasoned that these were probably the native parasite antigens that our DIR and CI sera were targeting during the course of S. haematobium infection. Of the 20 antigens that were targets of significantly elevated IgG1 responses in post-treatment DIRs compared to CIs, only 7 (35%) were targets of IgE responses that were deemed to be above the reactivity cut-off (Figure 4).
Figure 3

IgG1 antibody profiles to arrayed antigens differ between . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG1 antibody responses to each reactive antigen are shown for the drug-induced resistant (DIR) and chronically infected (CI) cohorts after praziquantel treatment. Boxed antigens indicate homologs of known vaccine candidates. The dashed line is the cut-off for IgG1 reactivity (8239), calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Table 1

Arrayed proteins significantly reactive to .

Array ID (GenBank accession number)DescriptionReactivity differencea (p value)Frequency of recognition (%)S. haematobium homolog; amino acid identity with arrayed antigen
Therapeutic use
GenBank accession numberDescription/aa homologyLength (aa)TM domainsb
DIR-reactive proteins
AY810792Butylcholinesterase (S. japonicum)6.97 × 10−6100MS3_01257Acetylcholinesterase; 86%7451IgG to S. mansoni AchE drives complement-mediated killing of somules by 75–95% (53)
AY812951Mastin (S. japonicum)7.10 × 10−690MS3_04920Plasminogen; 70%4921
AY815196Similar to NM_079585 tetraspanin 86D in Drosophila melanogaster (S. japonicum)1.40 × 10−550MS3_02232Tetraspanin-33; 81%2594Vaccination with members of this family (Sm-TSP-1 and Sm-TSP-2) induces 65–69% protection in a mouse model of schistosomiasis (33). Vaccination with a member of this family (Sj23) induces 35% protection in a mouse model of schistosomiasis (54)
AY815945SJCHGC09124 protein (S. japonicum)2.29 × 10−5100MS3_10649Hypothetical protein; 73%141c3
AY809911SJCHGC02149 protein (S. japonicum); putative immunoglobulin domain superfamily (sensory guidance protein) (S. mansoni); 90%3.06 × 10−5MS3_07405Hypothetical protein; 87%574c1
C609117.1Succinate dehydrogenase (S. mansoni)1.37 × 10−4100MS3_03684Succinate dehydrogenase cytochrome b560 subunit, mitochondrial; 93%3792
AY815690Myosin-7 (S. japonicum)d2.25 × 10−480MS3_09744Ribosome-binding protein 1; 90%7750
AY812591SJCHGC04069 protein (S. japonicum)4.25 × 10−4100MS3_01313Hypothetical protein (RNA binding); 71%3920
AY222868SJCHGC06654 protein (S. japonicum)4.45 × 10−490MS3_04717Large subunit ribosomal protein; 48%1501
AY808953Zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 3 (S. japonicum)0.0023100MS3_10292Hypothetical protein; 41%2010
AY814497SJCHGC02432 protein (S. japonicum)0.0027100MS3_04817Hypothetical protein; 58%3510
AY814261Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 5 (S. japonicum)0.003390MS3_08684Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 5; 67%4521Suppression of S. mansoni ortholog (SmNPP-5) impairs the parasite’s ability to establish infection in vivo (55)
AY816000Cytochrome b-561 (S. japonicum)0.008160MS3_10028Cytochrome b-561; 85%2426
AY815303Similar to microsomal glutathione S-transferase in Oryctolagus cuniculus (S. japonicum)0.009950MS3_02176Microsomal glutathione S-transferase 3; 85%1513A member of this protein family (Sh28GST) is undergoing clinical trial as a vaccine against S. haematobium (51)
AY810700Solute carrier family 2 protein (S. japonicum)0.010050MS3_02545Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 1; 85%52212Suppression of S. mansoni ortholog (SGTP1) impairs the parasite’s ability to establish infection in vivo (56)
AY812972SJCHGC02374 protein (S. japonicum)0.010660MS3_11481Hypothetical protein; 90%71c0
AY814817SJCHGC06849 protein (S. japonicum)0.013090MS3_05945Hypothetical protein (TATA-box binding); 71%416c0
AY815056SJCHGC06191 protein (S. japonicum), marvel-containing potential lipid-raft-associated protein (S. mansoni); 90%0.015580MS3_07473Hypothetical protein; 91%2154
AY814977Nervana 2 (S. japonicum)0.038170MS3_03655Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit beta-2; 87%2931Suppression of S. mansoni ortholog (SNaK1β) impairs the parasite’s ability to establish infection in vivo (57)
AY814430Calpain (S. japonicum)0.0497100MS3_02003Calpain; 83%20280S. mansoni ortholog (Smp80) induces 64% protection in a baboon model of schistosomiasis (50)
Macaque-reactive proteins
AY815838SJCHGC05998 protein (S. japonicum)1.18 × 10−8e, 2.29 × 10−8f100N/A
AY812161UPF05056 protein (S. japonicum)8.72 × 10−4 e, 1.02 × 10−6f100N/A
AY815056SJCHGC06191 protein (S. japonicum), marvel-containing potential lipid-raft-associated protein (S. mansoni); 90%5.80 × 10−8e, 2.36 × 10−4f100N/A
AY810700Solute carrier family 2 protein (S. japonicum)0.0071e33N/ASuppression of S. mansoni ortholog (SGTP1) impairs the parasite’s ability to establish infection in vivo (56)
AY812195Extracellular superoxide dismutase (Cu–Zn) (S. japonicum)0.0071f83N/AS. mansoni ortholog (SmCT-SOD) induces 39% protection in a mouse model of schistosomiasis (58)
AY814158Major egg antigen (p40) (S. japonicum)0.0444e67N/A
AY808379SJCHGC09517 protein (S. japonicum)0.0454e17N/A
AY09526SJCHGC09219 protein (S. japonicum)0.0504e, 0.0067f67N/A

.

.

.

.

.

.

Figure 4

Some arrayed antigens that induce IgG1 responses in . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG1 and IgE antibody responses to each IgG1 antigen reactive to post-treatment sera from drug-induced resistant (DIR) humans. The dashed and solid lines are the respective cut-offs for IgG1 (8239) and IgE (1861) reactivity, calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Schistosoma japonicum SEA is included for comparative purposes.

IgG1 antibody profiles to arrayed antigens differ between . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG1 antibody responses to each reactive antigen are shown for the drug-induced resistant (DIR) and chronically infected (CI) cohorts after praziquantel treatment. Boxed antigens indicate homologs of known vaccine candidates. The dashed line is the cut-off for IgG1 reactivity (8239), calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Arrayed proteins significantly reactive to . . . . . . . Some arrayed antigens that induce IgG1 responses in . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG1 and IgE antibody responses to each IgG1 antigen reactive to post-treatment sera from drug-induced resistant (DIR) humans. The dashed and solid lines are the respective cut-offs for IgG1 (8239) and IgE (1861) reactivity, calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Schistosoma japonicum SEA is included for comparative purposes.

Transcription analysis

The transcription of genes in the adult and egg stages of S. haematobium was assessed for orthologs of all 20 arrayed S. mansoni and S. japonicum proteins that were the target of significantly different DIR IgG responses post-treatment using publicly available RNA-seq data. We did not find any significant difference in the level of transcription between life stages for a given protein. MS3_02176 (the gene encoding microsomal GST-3) was expressed most highly and relatively constitutively in all developmental stages examined (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Gene transcription in the adult and egg stages of . Data were assembled from publicly available RNA-seq databases (43). These data were filtered for quality (PHRED score of >30) using Trimmomatic (8) and aligned to the open reading frames of the published gene set (7) using Bowtie (v2.1.0) (9). Normalized levels of gene transcription were calculated using the software package RSEM (v1.2.11) (10) and reported as the numbers of transcripts per million reads sequenced (TPMs). The TPM value of each gene was log2-transformed and subjected to heat map visualization using R.

Gene transcription in the adult and egg stages of . Data were assembled from publicly available RNA-seq databases (43). These data were filtered for quality (PHRED score of >30) using Trimmomatic (8) and aligned to the open reading frames of the published gene set (7) using Bowtie (v2.1.0) (9). Normalized levels of gene transcription were calculated using the software package RSEM (v1.2.11) (10) and reported as the numbers of transcripts per million reads sequenced (TPMs). The TPM value of each gene was log2-transformed and subjected to heat map visualization using R.

IgG profiles of S. japonicum-infected self-curing rhesus macaques differ during the course of infection

To investigate IgG responses of rhesus macaques to arrayed proteins during the course of a self-curing infection, protein arrays were probed with sera taken at week 0 (primary infection), week 12, and week 20 (after parasite elimination). Antibody responses to all (eight proteins – Table 1) but one reactive protein (AY812195 – extracellular SOD) were significantly elevated between 0 and 12 weeks post-infection (p.i.), with the three most robust and highly significant responses being aimed at proteins of unknown function (AY815838 and AY812161) and a MARVEL domain-containing lipid-raft-associated protein (AY815056). The IgG reactivity of only one protein (AY812195 – extracellular SOD) was elevated at 20 weeks compared to 12 weeks p.i. (Figure 6; Table 1).
Figure 6

IgG antibody profiles to arrayed antigens differ in . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG antibody responses to each significantly reactive antigen are shown at baseline (0 weeks), 12 weeks post-infection, and elimination (20 weeks post-infection). The dashed line is the cut-off for IgG reactivity (3210), calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

IgG antibody profiles to arrayed antigens differ in . Average adjusted signal intensity values depicting IgG antibody responses to each significantly reactive antigen are shown at baseline (0 weeks), 12 weeks post-infection, and elimination (20 weeks post-infection). The dashed line is the cut-off for IgG reactivity (3210), calculated as one standard deviation of the mean of the no-DNA control spots on the array. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Three different disease models of resistance to schistosomiasis reveal common reactivity to some arrayed proteins

We searched for reactive proteins common to DIR human subjects, S. japonicum-infected self-curing rhesus macaques (both described herein), and humans living in an S. mansoni-endemic area of Brazil who, unlike DIRs, have never been treated with PZQ but are putatively resistant to infection (20). Three reactive proteins were common targets of “protective” antibody responses in the DIR and macaque models: a MARVEL domain-containing lipid-raft-associated protein; a glucose transporter (SGTP1); and an extracellular SOD (although the IgG response to this protein was not significantly elevated between DIRs and CIs after PZQ treatment). Two reactive antigens were commonly recognized by both DIRs and PRs: ribosome-binding protein 1 and the beta subunit of Na+/K+ ATPase (SNaK1β) (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Different disease models of schistosomiasis resistance show common IgG responses to some arrayed antigens. Venn diagram depicting common IgG reactive proteins between Schistosoma haematobium-infected humans from an endemic area in Africa who acquire drug-induced resistance (DIR) after praziquantel treatment, Schistosoma japonicum-infected self-curing rhesus macaques, and Schistosoma mansoni-infected humans from an endemic area of Brazil who are naturally resistant (PRs). *Data from Gaze et al. (20); %IgG1 response to AY812195 is significantly different between DIRs before and after praziquantel treatment but not between DIRs and CIs post-treatment; #AY814977 and Smp_124240 are the respective S. japonicum and S. mansoni orthologs of SNaK1β. ∧We believe the sequence represented by AY815690 [“myosin-7” (S. japonicum)] has been incorrectly annotated due to its high degree of homology with other parasite orthologs of ribosome-binding protein 1 and lack of BlastP hits with any form of myosin.

Different disease models of schistosomiasis resistance show common IgG responses to some arrayed antigens. Venn diagram depicting common IgG reactive proteins between Schistosoma haematobium-infected humans from an endemic area in Africa who acquire drug-induced resistance (DIR) after praziquantel treatment, Schistosoma japonicum-infected self-curing rhesus macaques, and Schistosoma mansoni-infected humans from an endemic area of Brazil who are naturally resistant (PRs). *Data from Gaze et al. (20); %IgG1 response to AY812195 is significantly different between DIRs before and after praziquantel treatment but not between DIRs and CIs post-treatment; #AY814977 and Smp_124240 are the respective S. japonicum and S. mansoni orthologs of SNaK1β. ∧We believe the sequence represented by AY815690 [“myosin-7” (S. japonicum)] has been incorrectly annotated due to its high degree of homology with other parasite orthologs of ribosome-binding protein 1 and lack of BlastP hits with any form of myosin.

Discussion

The critical role that antibodies play in resistance to schistosomiasis resistance has been well established in animal models by numerous passive transfer studies [e.g., Ref. (59, 60)], and there is evidence that some mechanisms of protective immunity in humans are antibody-mediated, both in individuals naturally resistant to schistosomiasis (20) and those who acquire resistance after PZQ therapy (25). Herein, we describe the antibody reactivity profiling of a schistosome protein array with sera from S. haematobium-exposed DIR and CI individuals and rhesus macaques self-cured of a S. japonicum experimental infection (34) in an effort to identify schistosome antigens that might be the targets of resistant human and non-human primate hosts. We previously utilized this protein microarray to define the antibody signatures of individuals that are either naturally resistant to or CI with S. mansoni in a schistosomiasis endemic area of Brazil (20). We restricted our antibody isotype analyses to IgG1 and IgE. IgG1 is one of the main drivers of the protective humoral response to schistosomiasis (23, 24), an observation supported by studies showing that key tegument vaccine antigens like Smp80 (calpain), Sm-TSP-2, and Sm29 are the targets of these responses in schistosome-resistant individuals (32, 33, 61). IgE is thought to be critical in resistance to schistosomiasis, including the DIR process (25, 62, 63), but caution is warranted in development of anti-helminth vaccines that drive IgE responses due to potential anaphylactic responses in individuals who are pre-sensitized from chronic helminth infection/exposure (64). Significantly elevated IgG1 responses were detected to 24 antigens in DIR subjects 18 months after therapy compared to pre-treatment responses. In stark contrast, we did not detect elevated IgG1 responses to any proteins in CI subjects at 18 months post-treatment compared to pre-treatment levels. None of these antigens were recognized in a previous study by us in which pooled sera from S. haematobium-exposed individuals before and after PZQ treatment were used to probe 2D gels containing S. haematobium SWAP (27), likely because the majority of proteins on the array are membrane-associated tegument proteins and might not be well represented in SWAP due to the very mild solubilizing nature (Tris) of the preparation. It is noteworthy that IgG1 reactivity to a further 105 (48%) arrayed antigens was significantly higher in post-compared to pre-treatment DIRs but signal intensities were below the cut-off, so the proteins were deemed non-reactive. This decreased level of reactivity possibly reflects the heterogeneity of the antigen–antibody interaction, i.e., antibodies to S. haematobium proteins are reacting with a protein array containing S. mansoni and S. japonicum antigens. Indeed, significant differences in antibody recognition patterns were observed when using sera from S. haematobium-exposed people to probe crude antigen preparations from the closely related S. bovis, and vice versa (65). Moreover, sequence variation in the epitopes of Sh28GST, and its homologs from S. mansoni and S. bovis significantly altered the immune response generated by the host (66). Twenty reactive arrayed antigens were the targets of significantly greater IgG1 responses in DIRs compared to CIs post-treatment. A further 72 (33%) proteins were the target of significantly different IgG1 recognition profiles between DIRs and CIs but were below the reactivity cut-off. We hypothesize that at least some of these IgG1-reactive proteins are major targets of protective immunity, engendering resistance to schistosomiasis through an antibody-mediated neutralization of the cognate antigen, the role of which is essential to the survival of the parasite within the host (e.g., nutrient acquisition, immune evasion) such that disruption of its function results in worm impairment. Indeed, some of these antigens are protective in animal challenge models of schistosomiasis; for example, vaccination with and the Ca2+-activated protease, calpain (AY814430), induces 64% in baboons (50). Sh28GST (a homolog of the arrayed immunoreactive protein AY815303) is a multi-functional enzyme present in the tegument and sub-tegument of adult (67) and larval (68) schistosomes and the current focus of vaccine trials in humans (51). Its exact function is unknown [studies suggest it may aid in immune evasion by the parasite through its role in fatty acid metabolism and prostaglandin D2 synthesis (69), but vaccine efficacy has been attributed to the induction of antibodies that neutralize enzyme activity (70)]. Other extracellular enzymes were prominent amongst the IgG1-reactive proteins, including proteases (calpain, mastin), esterases, and superoxide dismutase, so it is tempting to speculate that antibodies to these enzymes neutralize key physiological processes (71, 72), and this now warrants further investigation. Members of the TSP family in schistosomes (Sm-TSP-1 and Sm-TSP-2) are four-transmembrane domain proteins located within the tegument of larval and adult worms that have functions in membrane biogenesis (73). TSP-based vaccines have shown to be efficacious against schistosomiasis with Sm-TSP-1 and Sm-TSP-2 (33, 52) and Sj23 (54, 74) conferring protection in animal challenge models. Other significant IgG1 responses were aimed at tegument-associated proteins that play fundamental roles in parasitism. Surface-associated acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (AY810792) has been implicated in the regulation of glucose scavenging from host blood (75) and anti-AChE antibodies facilitate complement-mediated killing of larval schistosomes (53). Genes encoding the glucose transporter SGTP1 (AY810700), Na+/K+ ATPase subunit SNaK1β (AY814977) and ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase SmNPP-5 (AY814261) have all been functionally silenced within schistosomes using RNAi (55–57), resulting in impairment of the worm’s ability to establish infection in the host and highlighting their importance to parasite survival. Significantly IgG1-reactive proteins whose therapeutic potential has not yet been examined include mastin (AY812951) and a MARVEL domain-containing lipid-raft-associated protein (AY815056). Mastin is a trypsin-like serine protease and, in schistosomes, proteases of this class are known as cercarial elastases (CEs) for their role in skin degradation to facilitate penetration of the free-living cercaria into the definitive host (76). Mastin, however, differs in structural homology to CEs and has been assigned to a group of “non-CE” serine proteases (77). The five members of this group are yet to be functionally characterized in terms of their roles in parasitism, but mastin is unique in that it is highly upregulated in the intra-mammalian schistosomula and adult stages [60 and 150% relative to the constitutively expressed smcox1, respectively (77) compared to the free-living stages of the parasite (78, 79), alluding to a fundamental parasitic function]. MARVEL domains have four-transmembrane helix architecture and proteins containing these motifs associate with membrane micro-domains and have been implicated in membrane biogenesis (80). In a pathogenesis context, the MARVEL domain-containing protein Nce102 regulates actin organization and invasive growth of Candida albicans, with Nce102 deletion mutants showing decreased virulence in mice (81). Antigens such as mastin and the MARVEL domain protein are attractive vaccine candidates for the reasons described herein as well as the successful use of proteases (82–84) and membrane structural proteins as anti-helminth vaccines [e.g., Ref. (33, 54, 85, 86)]. A group of ribosome-associated proteins were also the targets of significantly higher IgG1 responses in DIRs compared to CIs post-treatment and included ribosome-binding protein 1. Ribosome-associated proteins have received attention in the field of parasite immunology because of their classification as “patho-antigens” – conserved intracellular molecules capable of inducing an immunopathological response (87). Patho-antigens such as acidic ribosomal protein P0 conferred protection as vaccines against the intracellular parasites Leishmania major (87) and Plasmodium yoelii (88) in mouse challenge models of infection, and antibodies to P. falciparum P0 have been detected in individuals who are immune to malaria (89). The roles of these antigens, such as ribosome-binding protein 1, in the induction of anti-schistosome immunity is unclear, but it is possible that these intracellular molecules are stimulating host immune effectors through exosome-mediated pathways [recently identified in related helminths (90, 91)]. It should also be noted that ribosome-binding protein 1 was one of the two antigens recognized by both S. mansoni-exposed PR subjects in Brazil and S. haematobium-exposed DIR subjects in Africa (Figure 6), possibly highlighting a common role in different mechanisms of schistosomiasis resistance. IgE responses to arrayed antigens were, for the most part, significantly weaker in post-therapy DIRs compared to pre-treatment responses, which appears to be in contrast to the positive association between IgE levels and the process of acquiring DIR status (25, 62). This could be likely for two reasons: (1) these earlier studies on DIR employed soluble antigen preparations to detect IgE responses, whereas the majority of arrayed proteins are membrane-associated and therefore would not have been present in buffer-soluble parasite extracts or (2) the DIR cohort, being egg-negative, does not receive the IgE-inducing stimulus of egg antigens (92). The latter explanation may be supported by the case of extracellular SOD (AY812195); the IgE response to this protein was significantly lower in egg-negative, post-treatment DIRs (Figure 2B) but significantly higher in egg-positive, post-treatment CIs (data not shown). Indeed, a recent study describing the prediction of IgE-binding antigens in S. mansoni-infected individuals reported no significant change in the IgE response to extracellular SOD before and 5 weeks after PZQ treatment (93), which lends support to the observation that the waning IgE response to some antigens in DIRs might be due to the reduced amount of IgE-inducing stimulus received by this cohort. Less than half of the antigens that were significantly reactive for DIR post-treatment IgG1 compared to pre-treatment levels were reactive (above the cut-off) for IgE responses. IgE poses somewhat of a conundrum for helminth vaccinologists due to its clear association with naturally acquired protection (22, 63), but the accompanying risk of vaccinating people with a recombinant protein that is the target of pre-existing IgE responses and poses the risk of inducing atopy (64), or potentially anaphylaxis. Instead of excluding potentially protective IgG1-inducing antigens that are the targets of parasite-derived IgE in exposed individuals from further vaccine development, we propose that the molecules be assessed for allergenicity through the use of basophil-activation studies, given that the induction of IgE and clinical manifestation of allergy are not mutually inclusive events (94). Another strategy aimed at minimizing potential allergenicity of helminth proteins involves their fusion to Fcγ, thereby directing the chimeric protein to the negative signaling receptor FcγRIIb expressed on pro-allergic cells (95). The IgG1 response in S. japonicum-infected self-curing macaques to the majority of reactive antigens was significantly higher at 12 weeks p.i. [around the time that worm death starts to occur (34)] compared to week 0. Proteins that were the target of these antibodies included a protein with weak sequence homology to a bacterial hydrolase (AY815838), extracellular SOD (AY812195), and the previously discussed glucose transport and MARVEL domain-containing proteins. Extracellular SOD is thought to facilitate the parasite’s evasion of the immune response by neutralizing the effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and has proven efficacious in murine vaccine trials (58). Moreover, both hydrolases and anti-oxidant enzymes were suggested to be the targets of IgG-mediated worm elimination in a previously established macaque self-cure model of schistosomiasis (34). Given the cognate recognition of antigen by both B and helper T cells in the immune response, we hypothesize that the best antigens for a recombinant protein vaccine are those that elicit responses by both antibodies and T cells during the acquisition of DIR. The antigens described herein should now be subjected to further refinement by assessing their ability to drive T-cell proliferation ex vivo. T-cell profiling of B-cell antigens has been conducted for the vaccinia virus (discovered using protein array profiling) where plasmids encoding arrayed proteins were expressed as inclusion bodies and screened for T-cell reactivity in a high-throughput format (96). In this pilot study, we have described the screening of a schistosome protein array to identify potential targets of protective immunity in S. haematobium-infected people who acquire DIR after PZQ treatment, with the hypothesis that these antigens are responsible for essential parasitic functions such that antibody-mediated neutralization of these molecules result in worm impairment or death. While the modest number of targets identified from this work may be reflective of the heterogeneity between the antigens and sera used in the study, a benefit of this approach is the identification of proteins that are cross-reactive between S. haematobium, S. japonicum, and S. mansoni, a desirable feature of a vaccine antigen if it is to be protective against all medically important schistosome species. If a pan-schistosome vaccine is developed, it will likely be part of a control program that integrates a vaccination cocktail of multiple recombinant antigens with chemotherapy, and so a comprehensive portfolio of the targets of DIR is a crucial component of the vaccine discovery strategy. Future iterations of our protein array will be expanded to represent even more of the schistosome proteome, ensuring that an extensive complement of DIR-reactive vaccine antigens will be available for progression into further development.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  96 in total

1.  Inter-species variation of schistosome 28-kDa glutathione S-transferases.

Authors:  F Trottein; C Godin; R J Pierce; B Sellin; M G Taylor; I Gorillot; M S Silva; J P Lecocq; A Capron
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 2.  Blunting the knife: development of vaccines targeting digestive proteases of blood-feeding helminth parasites.

Authors:  Mark S Pearson; Najju Ranjit; Alex Loukas
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.915

3.  Proteins exposed at the adult schistosome surface revealed by biotinylation.

Authors:  Simon Braschi; R Alan Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Sex-dependent neutralizing humoral response to Schistosoma mansoni 28GST antigen in infected human populations.

Authors:  F Remoué; F Rogerie; M C Gallissot; H L Guyatt; J L Neyrinck; M M Diakkhate; M Niang; A E Butterworth; C Auriault; A Capron; G Riveau
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Whole-genome sequence of Schistosoma haematobium.

Authors:  Neil D Young; Aaron R Jex; Bo Li; Shiping Liu; Linfeng Yang; Zijun Xiong; Yingrui Li; Cinzia Cantacessi; Ross S Hall; Xun Xu; Fangyuan Chen; Xuan Wu; Adhemar Zerlotini; Guilherme Oliveira; Andreas Hofmann; Guojie Zhang; Xiaodong Fang; Yi Kang; Bronwyn E Campbell; Alex Loukas; Shoba Ranganathan; David Rollinson; Gabriel Rinaldi; Paul J Brindley; Huanming Yang; Jun Wang; Jian Wang; Robin B Gasser
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  A review of female genital schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Eyrun F Kjetland; Peter D C Leutscher; Patricia D Ndhlovu
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2012-01-12

8.  Influence of exposure history on the immunology and development of resistance to human Schistosomiasis mansoni.

Authors:  Carla L Black; Pauline N M Mwinzi; Erick M O Muok; Bernard Abudho; Colin M Fitzsimmons; David W Dunne; Diana M S Karanja; W Evan Secor; Daniel G Colley
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 9.  Chapter 4. Peptidases of trematodes.

Authors:  Martin Kasný; Libor Mikes; Vladimír Hampl; Jan Dvorák; Conor R Caffrey; John P Dalton; Petr Horák
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.870

10.  Human IgE, IgG4 and resistance to reinfection with Schistosoma haematobium.

Authors:  P Hagan; U J Blumenthal; D Dunn; A J Simpson; H A Wilkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Whole-Proteome Differential Screening Identifies Novel Vaccine Candidates for Schistosomiasis japonica.

Authors:  Hannah W Wu; Sangshin Park; Sunthorn Pond-Tor; Ron Stuart; Sha Zhou; Yang Hong; Amanda E Ruiz; Luz Acosta; Blanca Jarilla; Jennifer F Friedman; Mario Jiz; Jonathan D Kurtis
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Evidence That Rhesus Macaques Self-Cure from a Schistosoma japonicum Infection by Disrupting Worm Esophageal Function: A New Route to an Effective Vaccine?

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Li; Yu-Xin Xu; Gill Vance; Yun Wang; Long-Bao Lv; Govert J van Dam; Jian-Ping Cao; R Alan Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 3.  Schistosomiasis vaccines: where do we stand?

Authors:  Biniam Mathewos Tebeje; Marina Harvie; Hong You; Alex Loukas; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Specific anti-glycan antibodies are sustained during and after parasite clearance in Schistosoma japonicum-infected rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Y Y Michelle Yang; Xiao Hong Li; Katarzyna Brzezicka; Niels-Christian Reichardt; R Alan Wilson; Angela van Diepen; Cornelis H Hokke
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-02-02

5.  SmSP2: A serine protease secreted by the blood fluke pathogen Schistosoma mansoni with anti-hemostatic properties.

Authors:  Adrian Leontovyč; Lenka Ulrychová; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Jiří Vondrášek; Lucie Marešová; Martin Hubálek; Pavla Fajtová; Marta Chanová; Zhenze Jiang; Charles S Craik; Conor R Caffrey; Michael Mareš; Jan Dvořák; Martin Horn
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-04-20

6.  Suppression of Schistosoma japonicum Acetylcholinesterase Affects Parasite Growth and Development.

Authors:  Hong You; Chang Liu; Xiaofeng Du; Sujeevi Nawaratna; Vanessa Rivera; Marina Harvie; Malcolm Jones; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Editorial: The Schistosomiasis Vaccine - It is Time to Stand up.

Authors:  Rashika El Ridi; Ahmad A Othman; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Functional characterisation of Schistosoma japonicum acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  Hong You; Geoffrey N Gobert; Xiaofeng Du; Gabor Pali; Pengfei Cai; Malcolm K Jones; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Vaccination Against Whipworm: Identification of Potential Immunogenic Proteins in Trichuris muris Excretory/Secretory Material.

Authors:  Rebecca K Shears; Allison J Bancroft; Catherine Sharpe; Richard K Grencis; David J Thornton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Acetylcholinesterase and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Schistosomes and Other Parasitic Helminths.

Authors:  Hong You; Chang Liu; Xiaofeng Du; Donald P McManus
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.