Todd M Rosenthal1, Paul F Stahls1, Freddy M Abi Samra1, Michael L Bernard1, Sammy Khatib1, Glenn M Polin1, Joel Q Xue2, Daniel P Morin3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana. 2. GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; Ochsner Clinical School, University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. Electronic address: dmorin@ochsner.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The electrocardiographic T-wave peak to T-wave end interval (Tpe) correlates with dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR). Increased DVR increases propensity toward electrical reentry that can cause ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The baseline rate-corrected Tpe (Tpec) has been shown to predict ventricular tachyarrhythmia and death in multiple patient populations but not among cardiomyopathic patients undergoing insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk stratification ability of the Tpec in patients with systolic cardiomyopathy without prior ventricular tachyarrhythmia (ie, the primary prevention population). METHODS: We performed prospective follow-up of 305 patients (73% men; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 23 ± 7%) with LVEF ≤35% and an ICD implanted for primary prevention. Baseline ECGs were analyzed with automated algorithms. Endpoints were ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), death, and a combined endpoint of VT/VF or death, assessed by device follow-up and Social Security Death Index query. RESULTS: The average Tpec was 107 ± 22 ms. During device clinic follow-up of 31 ± 23 months, 82 patients (27%) had appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF, and during mortality follow-up of 49 ± 21 months, 91 patients (30%) died. On univariable analysis, Tpec predicted VT/VF, death, and the combined endpoint of VT/VF or death (P < .05 for each endpoint). Multivariable analysis included univariable predictors among demographics, clinical data, laboratory data, medications used, and electrocardiography parameters. After correction, Tpec remained predictive of VT/VF (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-ms increase 1.16, P = .009), all-cause mortality (HR per 10 ms 1.13, P = .05), and the combined endpoint (HR per 10 ms 1.17, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Tpec independently predicts both VT/VF and overall mortality in patients with systolic dysfunction and ICDs implanted for primary prevention.
BACKGROUND: The electrocardiographic T-wave peak to T-wave end interval (Tpe) correlates with dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR). Increased DVR increases propensity toward electrical reentry that can cause ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The baseline rate-corrected Tpe (Tpec) has been shown to predict ventricular tachyarrhythmia and death in multiple patient populations but not among cardiomyopathicpatients undergoing insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk stratification ability of the Tpec in patients with systolic cardiomyopathy without prior ventricular tachyarrhythmia (ie, the primary prevention population). METHODS: We performed prospective follow-up of 305 patients (73% men; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 23 ± 7%) with LVEF ≤35% and an ICD implanted for primary prevention. Baseline ECGs were analyzed with automated algorithms. Endpoints were ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), death, and a combined endpoint of VT/VF or death, assessed by device follow-up and Social Security Death Index query. RESULTS: The average Tpec was 107 ± 22 ms. During device clinic follow-up of 31 ± 23 months, 82 patients (27%) had appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF, and during mortality follow-up of 49 ± 21 months, 91 patients (30%) died. On univariable analysis, Tpec predicted VT/VF, death, and the combined endpoint of VT/VF or death (P < .05 for each endpoint). Multivariable analysis included univariable predictors among demographics, clinical data, laboratory data, medications used, and electrocardiography parameters. After correction, Tpec remained predictive of VT/VF (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-ms increase 1.16, P = .009), all-cause mortality (HR per 10 ms 1.13, P = .05), and the combined endpoint (HR per 10 ms 1.17, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Tpec independently predicts both VT/VF and overall mortality in patients with systolic dysfunction and ICDs implanted for primary prevention.
Authors: Keith A Marill; Pat Dorsey; Anthony Holmes; Ketaki Muthal; Emily S Miller; Joel Xue Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Leon Dinshaw; Julia Münch; Jannis Dickow; Susanne Lezius; Stephan Willems; Boris A Hoffmann; Monica Patten Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Emily A Fletcher; Carolyn S Lacey; Melenie Aaron; Mark Kolasa; Andrew Occiano; Sachin A Shah Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Katherine C Wu; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Sabina A Haberlen; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Todd T Brown; Matthew J Budoff; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Jared W Magnani; Lawrence A Kingsley; Frank J Palella; Joseph B Margolick; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Sean F Altekruse; Elsayed Z Soliman; Wendy S Post Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 1.468