MAIN CONCLUSION: Field-evolved resistance of goosegrass to glyphosate is due to double or single mutation in EPSPS , or amplification of EPSPS leads to increased transcription and protein levels. Glyphosate has been used widely in the south of China. The high selection pressure from glyphosate use has led to the evolution of resistance to glyphosate in weeds. We investigated the molecular mechanisms of three recently discovered glyphosate-resistant Eleusine indica populations (R1, R2 and R3). The results showed that R1 and R2 had double Thr102Ile and Pro106Ser mutation and a single mutation of Pro106Leu in the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene, respectively. Escherichia coli containing the mutated EPSPS genes was tolerant to glyphosate. EPSPS activity in R1 and R2 plants was higher than in the sensitive plants. There was no amino acid substitution in EPSPS gene in R3. However, expression of EPSPS in R3 plants was higher than in glyphosate-susceptible (S) population (13.8-fold) after glyphosate treatment. EPSPS enzyme activity in both R3 and S plants was inhibited by glyphosate, while shikimate accumulation in R3 was significantly lower than for the S population. Further analysis revealed that the genome of R3 contained 28.3-fold more copies of the EPSPS gene than that of susceptible population. EPSPS expression was positively correlated with copy number of EPSPS. In conclusion, mutation of the EPSPS gene and increased EPSPS expression are part of the molecular mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate in Eleusine indica.
MAIN CONCLUSION: Field-evolved resistance of goosegrass to glyphosate is due to double or single mutation in EPSPS , or amplification of EPSPS leads to increased transcription and protein levels. Glyphosate has been used widely in the south of China. The high selection pressure from glyphosate use has led to the evolution of resistance to glyphosate in weeds. We investigated the molecular mechanisms of three recently discovered glyphosate-resistant Eleusine indica populations (R1, R2 and R3). The results showed that R1 and R2 had double Thr102Ile and Pro106Ser mutation and a single mutation of Pro106Leu in the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene, respectively. Escherichia coli containing the mutated EPSPS genes was tolerant to glyphosate. EPSPS activity in R1 and R2 plants was higher than in the sensitive plants. There was no amino acid substitution in EPSPS gene in R3. However, expression of EPSPS in R3 plants was higher than in glyphosate-susceptible (S) population (13.8-fold) after glyphosate treatment. EPSPS enzyme activity in both R3 and S plants was inhibited by glyphosate, while shikimate accumulation in R3 was significantly lower than for the S population. Further analysis revealed that the genome of R3 contained 28.3-fold more copies of the EPSPS gene than that of susceptible population. EPSPS expression was positively correlated with copy number of EPSPS. In conclusion, mutation of the EPSPS gene and increased EPSPS expression are part of the molecular mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate in Eleusine indica.
Authors: Andrew T Wiersma; Todd A Gaines; Christopher Preston; John P Hamilton; Darci Giacomini; C Robin Buell; Jan E Leach; Philip Westra Journal: Planta Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 4.116
Authors: Fidel González-Torralva; Javier Gil-Humanes; Francisco Barro; Ivo Brants; Rafael De Prado Journal: Plant Physiol Biochem Date: 2012-06-17 Impact factor: 4.270
Authors: Todd A Gaines; Wenli Zhang; Dafu Wang; Bekir Bukun; Stephen T Chisholm; Dale L Shaner; Scott J Nissen; William L Patzoldt; Patrick J Tranel; A Stanley Culpepper; Timothy L Grey; Theodore M Webster; William K Vencill; R Douglas Sammons; Jiming Jiang; Christopher Preston; Jan E Leach; Philip Westra Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Reiofeli A Salas; Franck E Dayan; Zhiqiang Pan; Susan B Watson; James W Dickson; Robert C Scott; Nilda R Burgos Journal: Pest Manag Sci Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 4.845
Authors: Shiv S Kaundun; Richard P Dale; Ian A Zelaya; Giovanni Dinelli; Ilaria Marotti; Eddie McIndoe; Andrew Cairns Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Qin Yu; Adam Jalaludin; Heping Han; Ming Chen; R Douglas Sammons; Stephen B Powles Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Todd A Gaines; Stephen O Duke; Sarah Morran; Carlos A G Rigon; Patrick J Tranel; Anita Küpper; Franck E Dayan Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Maycon Vinicius Damasceno de Oliveira; Gilson Mateus Bittencourt Fernandes; Kauê S da Costa; Serhii Vakal; Anderson H Lima Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz; Antonia M Rojano-Delgado; María J Giménez; Hugo E Cruz-Hipolito; José A Domínguez-Valenzuela; Francisco Barro; Rafael De Prado Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Xiao Yang; Zachery T Beres; Lin Jin; Jason T Parrish; Wanying Zhao; David Mackey; Allison A Snow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Enzo R Bracamonte; Pablo T Fernández-Moreno; Fernando Bastida; María D Osuna; Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz; Hugo E Cruz-Hipolito; Rafael De Prado Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz; Pablo T Fernández-Moreno; Carmen V Ozuna; Antonia M Rojano-Delgado; Hugo E Cruz-Hipolito; José A Domínguez-Valenzuela; Francisco Barro; Rafael De Prado Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 5.753