Chanjuan Mao1, Hongjie Xie1, Shiguo Chen1, Bernal E Valverde1,2, Sheng Qiang3. 1. Weed Research Laboratory, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. 2. College of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark. 3. Weed Research Laboratory, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. wrl@njau.edu.cn.
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION: A combination of unique EPSPS structure and increased gene copy number and expression contribute to natural glyphosate tolerance in three lilyturf species. A few plants are naturally tolerant to glyphosate, the most widely used non-selective herbicide worldwide. Here, the basis for natural tolerance to glyphosate in three lilyturf species, Ophiopogon japonicus (OJ), Liriope spicata (LS), and Liriope platyphylla (LP), is characterized. These species tolerate glyphosate at about five times the commercially recommended field dose. They share three unique amino acids in their 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) that affect glyphosate binding. These correspond to Asp71Met, Ala112Ile, and Val201Met amino acid variations compared to 231 other published plant EPSPS amino acid sequences. There was also a common deletion at 91 of a highly conserved glutamic acid. Glyphosate-treated lilyturf plants accumulated little shikimic acid but had significantly higher levels of EPSPS mRNA than initially expressed in the control. The IC50 of LsEPSPS was 14.0 µM compared to the 5.1 µM of Arabidopsis thaliana. The higher K m and K i values of LsEPSPS kinetics showed that LsEPSPS had lower substrate binding affinity to glyphosate. Overexpression of LsEPSPS in the recombinant E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain enhanced its tolerance to glyphosate. Both OJ and LS had two copies of the EPSPS gene, while LP had three copies. Therefore, a combination of unique EPSPS structure and increased gene copy number and expression contribute to natural glyphosate tolerance in the three lilyturf species.
MAIN CONCLUSION: A combination of unique EPSPS structure and increased gene copy number and expression contribute to natural glyphosate tolerance in three lilyturf species. A few plants are naturally tolerant to glyphosate, the most widely used non-selective herbicide worldwide. Here, the basis for natural tolerance to glyphosate in three lilyturf species, Ophiopogon japonicus (OJ), Liriope spicata (LS), and Liriope platyphylla (LP), is characterized. These species tolerate glyphosate at about five times the commercially recommended field dose. They share three unique amino acids in their 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) that affect glyphosate binding. These correspond to Asp71Met, Ala112Ile, and Val201Met amino acid variations compared to 231 other published plant EPSPS amino acid sequences. There was also a common deletion at 91 of a highly conserved glutamic acid. Glyphosate-treated lilyturf plants accumulated little shikimic acid but had significantly higher levels of EPSPS mRNA than initially expressed in the control. The IC50 of LsEPSPS was 14.0 µM compared to the 5.1 µM of Arabidopsis thaliana. The higher K m and K i values of LsEPSPS kinetics showed that LsEPSPS had lower substrate binding affinity to glyphosate. Overexpression of LsEPSPS in the recombinant E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain enhanced its tolerance to glyphosate. Both OJ and LS had two copies of the EPSPS gene, while LP had three copies. Therefore, a combination of unique EPSPS structure and increased gene copy number and expression contribute to natural glyphosate tolerance in the three lilyturf species.
Authors: Xia Ge; Dana André d'Avignon; Joseph J H Ackerman; Bill Duncan; Marvin B Spaur; Robert Douglas Sammons Journal: Pest Manag Sci Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 4.845
Authors: Todd A Gaines; Wenli Zhang; Dafu Wang; Bekir Bukun; Stephen T Chisholm; Dale L Shaner; Scott J Nissen; William L Patzoldt; Patrick J Tranel; A Stanley Culpepper; Timothy L Grey; Theodore M Webster; William K Vencill; R Douglas Sammons; Jiming Jiang; Christopher Preston; Jan E Leach; Philip Westra Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Reiofeli A Salas; Franck E Dayan; Zhiqiang Pan; Susan B Watson; James W Dickson; Robert C Scott; Nilda R Burgos Journal: Pest Manag Sci Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 4.845
Authors: Shiv S Kaundun; Richard P Dale; Ian A Zelaya; Giovanni Dinelli; Ilaria Marotti; Eddie McIndoe; Andrew Cairns Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Qin Yu; Adam Jalaludin; Heping Han; Ming Chen; R Douglas Sammons; Stephen B Powles Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Andrew S Barrow; Rebecca M Christoff; Emily R R Mackie; Belinda M Abbott; Anthony R Gendall; Tatiana P Soares da Costa Journal: Elife Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz; Antonia M Rojano-Delgado; María J Giménez; Hugo E Cruz-Hipolito; José A Domínguez-Valenzuela; Francisco Barro; Rafael De Prado Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Enzo R Bracamonte; Pablo T Fernández-Moreno; Fernando Bastida; María D Osuna; Ricardo Alcántara-de la Cruz; Hugo E Cruz-Hipolito; Rafael De Prado Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Emily C M Fonseca; Kauê S da Costa; Jerônimo Lameira; Cláudio Nahum Alves; Anderson H Lima Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Pablo T Fernández-Moreno; Ricardo Alcantara-de la Cruz; Hugo E Cruz-Hipólito; Antonia M Rojano-Delgado; Ilias Travlos; Rafael De Prado Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 5.753