R Paul Robertson1. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Pacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute, Seattle, WA; and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN rpr@pnri.org.
Abstract
The therapeutic potential of pancreatic islet allotransplantation, in which human donor islets are used, as a treatment for type 1 diabetes (T1D) has fascinated diabetes researchers and clinicians for decades. At the same time, the therapeutic potential of total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) (in which one's own islets are used) as a preventive treatment for diabetes in patients who undergo total pancreatectomy for chronic, painful pancreatitis has received relatively less attention. This is ironic, since the latter has been much more effective than the former in terms of successful glucose management and duration of efficacy. The reasons for this disparity can be partially identified. TPIAT receives very little attention in textbooks of internal medicine and general surgery and surprisingly little print in textbooks of endocrinology and transplantation. T1D is much more predominant than TPIAT as a clinical entity. Provision of insulin or replacement of islets is mandatory and a primary goal in T1D. Provision of pain relief from chronic pancreatitis is the primary goal of total pancreatectomy in TPIAT, whereas treatment of diabetes, and certainly prevention of diabetes, has been more of a secondary consideration. Nonetheless, research developments in both fields have contributed to success in one another. In this Perspective, I will provide a brief history of islet transplantation and contrast and compare the procedures of allo- and autoislet transplantation from three major points of view 1) the procedures of islet procurement, isolation, and transplantation; 2) the role and complications of immunosuppressive drugs; and 3) the posttransplant consequences on β- as well as α-cell function.
The therapeutic potential of pancreatic islet allotransplantation, in which humandonor islets are used, as a treatment for type 1 diabetes (T1D) has fascinated diabetes researchers and clinicians for decades. At the same time, the therapeutic potential of total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) (in which one's own islets are used) as a preventive treatment for diabetes in patients who undergo total pancreatectomy for chronic, painful pancreatitis has received relatively less attention. This is ironic, since the latter has been much more effective than the former in terms of successful glucose management and duration of efficacy. The reasons for this disparity can be partially identified. TPIAT receives very little attention in textbooks of internal medicine and general surgery and surprisingly little print in textbooks of endocrinology and transplantation. T1D is much more predominant than TPIAT as a clinical entity. Provision of insulin or replacement of islets is mandatory and a primary goal in T1D. Provision of pain relief from chronic pancreatitis is the primary goal of total pancreatectomy in TPIAT, whereas treatment of diabetes, and certainly prevention of diabetes, has been more of a secondary consideration. Nonetheless, research developments in both fields have contributed to success in one another. In this Perspective, I will provide a brief history of islet transplantation and contrast and compare the procedures of allo- and autoislet transplantation from three major points of view 1) the procedures of islet procurement, isolation, and transplantation; 2) the role and complications of immunosuppressive drugs; and 3) the posttransplant consequences on β- as well as α-cell function.
Authors: Niraj M Desai; John A Goss; Shaoping Deng; Bryan A Wolf; Eileen Markmann; Maral Palanjian; Angela P Shock; Sue Feliciano; F Charles Brunicardi; Clyde F Barker; Ali Naji; James F Markmann Journal: Transplantation Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Bernhard J Hering; Raja Kandaswamy; Jeffrey D Ansite; Peter M Eckman; Masahiko Nakano; Toshiya Sawada; Ippei Matsumoto; Sung-Hee Ihm; Hui-Jian Zhang; Jamen Parkey; David W Hunter; David E R Sutherland Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-02-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David E R Sutherland; David M Radosevich; Melena D Bellin; Bernard J Hering; Gregory J Beilman; Ty B Dunn; Srinath Chinnakotla; Selwyn M Vickers; Barbara Bland; A N Balamurugan; Martin L Freeman; Timothy L Pruett Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: K L Pyzdrowski; D M Kendall; J B Halter; R E Nakhleh; D E Sutherland; R P Robertson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-07-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D W Scharp; P E Lacy; J V Santiago; C S McCullough; L G Weide; P J Boyle; L Falqui; P Marchetti; C Ricordi; R L Gingerich Journal: Transplantation Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A G Tzakis; C Ricordi; R Alejandro; Y Zeng; J J Fung; S Todo; A J Demetris; D H Mintz; T E Starzl Journal: Lancet Date: 1990-08-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pratik Choudhary; Michael R Rickels; Peter A Senior; Marie-Christine Vantyghem; Paola Maffi; Thomas W Kay; Bart Keymeulen; Nobuya Inagaki; Frantisek Saudek; Roger Lehmann; Bernhard J Hering Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ibrahim Elsharkawi; Divyasree Parambath; Maha Saber-Ayad; Amir Ali Khan; Ahmed T El-Serafi Journal: Hum Cell Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.174
Authors: G P Forlenza; B M Nathan; A M Moran; T B Dunn; G J Beilman; T L Pruett; M D Bellin Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Wen Yuan Chung; Cristina A Pollard; Rohan Kumar; Christopher J Drogemuller; Bashoo Naziruddin; Cordula Stover; Eyad Issa; John Isherwood; Jill Cooke; Marlon F Levy; P Toby H Coates; Giuseppe Garcea; Ashley R Dennison Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-01