Jean Hay-Smith1,2, Sarah Dean3, Kathryn Burgio4,5, Doreen McClurg6, Helena Frawley7,8, Chantale Dumoulin9,10. 1. Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. 2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand. 3. Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom. 4. Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham. 5. Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham. 6. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland. 7. Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Allied Health, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia. 9. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada. 10. Urogynaecological Health and Aging, Research Centre of the Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: This review aims to locate and summarize the findings of qualitative studies exploring the experience of and adherence to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to recommend future directions for practice and research. METHODS: Primary qualitative studies were identified through a conventional subject search of electronic databases, reference-list checking, and expert contact. A core eligibility criterion was the inclusion of verbatim quotes from participants about PFMT experiences. Details of study aims, methods, and participants were extracted and tabulated. Data were inductively grouped into categories describing "modifiers" of adherence (verified by a second author) and systematically displayed with supporting illustrative quotes. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (14 study reports) were included; eight recruited only or predominantly women with urinary incontinence, three recruited postnatal women, and two included women with pelvic organ prolapse. The quality of methodological reporting varied. Six "modifiers" of adherence were described: knowledge; physical skill; feelings about PFMT; cognitive analysis, planning, and attention; prioritization; and service provision. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals' experience substantial difficulties with capability (particularly knowledge and skills), motivation (especially associated with the considerable cognitive demands of PFMT), and opportunity (as external factors generate competing priorities) when adopting and maintaining a PFMT program. Expert consensus was that judicious selection and deliberate application of appropriate behavior change strategies directed to the "modifiers" of adherence identified in the review may improve PFMT outcomes. Future research is needed to explore whether the review findings are congruent with the PFMT experiences of antenatal women, men, and adults with fecal incontinence.
AIMS: This review aims to locate and summarize the findings of qualitative studies exploring the experience of and adherence to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to recommend future directions for practice and research. METHODS: Primary qualitative studies were identified through a conventional subject search of electronic databases, reference-list checking, and expert contact. A core eligibility criterion was the inclusion of verbatim quotes from participants about PFMT experiences. Details of study aims, methods, and participants were extracted and tabulated. Data were inductively grouped into categories describing "modifiers" of adherence (verified by a second author) and systematically displayed with supporting illustrative quotes. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (14 study reports) were included; eight recruited only or predominantly women with urinary incontinence, three recruited postnatal women, and two included women with pelvic organ prolapse. The quality of methodological reporting varied. Six "modifiers" of adherence were described: knowledge; physical skill; feelings about PFMT; cognitive analysis, planning, and attention; prioritization; and service provision. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals' experience substantial difficulties with capability (particularly knowledge and skills), motivation (especially associated with the considerable cognitive demands of PFMT), and opportunity (as external factors generate competing priorities) when adopting and maintaining a PFMT program. Expert consensus was that judicious selection and deliberate application of appropriate behavior change strategies directed to the "modifiers" of adherence identified in the review may improve PFMT outcomes. Future research is needed to explore whether the review findings are congruent with the PFMT experiences of antenatal women, men, and adults with fecal incontinence.
Authors: Suzanne Hagen; Carol Bugge; Sarah G Dean; Andrew Elders; Jean Hay-Smith; Mary Kilonzo; Doreen McClurg; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Wael Agur; Federico Andreis; Joanne Booth; Maria Dimitrova; Nicola Gillespie; Cathryn Glazener; Aileen Grant; Karen L Guerrero; Lorna Henderson; Marija Kovandzic; Alison McDonald; John Norrie; Nicole Sergenson; Susan Stratton; Anne Taylor; Louise R Williams Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Oriol Porta Roda; Miguel A Díaz López; Jesús Vara Paniagua; Marta Simó González; Paloma Díaz Bellido; Juan J Espinós Gómez Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Victoria E Salmon; E Jean C Hay-Smith; Rachel Jarvie; Sarah Dean; Eivor Oborn; Susan E Bayliss; Debra Bick; Clare Davenport; Khaled M Ismail; Christine MacArthur; Mark Pearson Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2017-01-25