Literature DB >> 25996703

Estimating cardiac output from blood pressure and heart rate: the liljestrand & zander formula.

Julian Koenig1, LaBarron K Hill, DeWayne P Williams, Julian F Thayer.   

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) is an important indicator of cardiovascular function. Several invasive and non-invasive methods have been developed and validated to assess CO in the clinical setting. These are often computationally complex or proprietarily-restricted, and thus, not feasible in ambulatory investigations and the laboratory research setting. Simple mathematical transforms have been proposed to estimate CO from pulse pressure (PP = mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP)), and mean heart rate (HR). Recently we evaluated one such simple technique [CO=(PPxHR)x.002], and found moderate correlation between the CO estimate and Modelflow-derived CO. Here we aimed to evaluate a more sophisticated formula, proposed in 1940 by Liljestrand and Zander. CO was estimated (COEST) dividing PP by the sum of SBP and DBP and multiplying the product by HR. This index was correlated with the Modelflow (3 element Windkessel) -derived CO. Baseline beat-to-beat blood pressure data from 67 young (mean age = 19.94± 2.8), healthy men (n = 30) and women (n = 37) was available for analysis. Overall, the correlation of COEST and CO was moderate (r = .42, p <.0001) and stronger in men (r = .66, p < .0001) compared to women (r = .36, p < .05). These results suggest that at least in some situations the Liljestrand and Zander method may provide an adequate measure of CO when other methods are not available.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25996703      PMCID: PMC5317099     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum        ISSN: 0067-8856


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of arterial compliance indices derived via beat-to-beat blood pressure waveforms: aging and ethnicity.

Authors:  John J Sollers; Marcellus M Merritt; Rebecca A Silver; Tammy N Sadle; Luigi Ferrucci; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Lailu Mathews; R K Kalyan Singh
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2008 Jan-Jun

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  J R Jansen; J J Schreuder; J P Mulier; N T Smith; J J Settels; K H Wesseling
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Evaluation of a simple estimation method for the derivation of cardiac output from arterial blood pressure and heart rate.

Authors:  Labarron K Hill; John J Sollers Iii; Jullian F Thayer
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2012

6.  The cardiac output from blood pressure algorithms trial.

Authors:  James X Sun; Andrew T Reisner; Mohammed Saeed; Thomas Heldt; Roger G Mark
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Estimation of cardiac output and peripheral resistance using square-wave-approximated aortic flow signal.

Authors:  Nima Fazeli; Jin-Oh Hahn
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Variability in the Aerobic Fitness-Related Dependence on Respiratory Processes During Muscle Work Is Associated With the ACE-I/D Genotype.

Authors:  Benedikt Gasser; Annika Frei; David Niederseer; Silvio Catuogno; Walter O Frey; Martin Flück
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Assessment of right ventricular reserve utilizing exercise provocation in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Monica Mukherjee; Valentina Mercurio; Steven Hsu; Susan A Mayer; Stephen C Mathai; Laura K Hummers; David A Kass; Paul M Hassoun; Fredrick M Wigley; Ryan J Tedford; Ami A Shah
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Distinct morphologies of arterial waveforms reveal preload-, contractility-, and afterload-deficient hemodynamic instability: An in silico simulation study.

Authors:  Marijn P Mulder; Michael Broomé; Dirk W Donker; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-04

4.  Non-invasive coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: A benchmark study comparing the diagnostic performance of four different computational methodologies.

Authors:  Jason Matthew Carson; Sanjay Pant; Carl Roobottom; Robin Alcock; Pablo Javier Blanco; Carlos Alberto Bulant; Yuri Vassilevski; Sergey Simakov; Timur Gamilov; Roman Pryamonosov; Fuyou Liang; Xinyang Ge; Yue Liu; Perumal Nithiarasu
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Longitudinal observations of sympathetic neural activity and hemodynamics during 6 months recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Nina L Stute; Rachel E Szeghy; Jonathon L Stickford; Valesha P Province; Marc A Augenreich; Stephen M Ratchford; Abigail S L Stickford
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-09

6.  Beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Amrita Pal; Fernando Martinez; Andrea P Aguila; Margaret A Akey; Roopsha Chatterjee; Merry Grace E Conserman; Ravi S Aysola; Luke A Henderson; Paul M Macey
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Concomitant diastolic dysfunction further interferes with cognitive performance in moderate to severe systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Mi-Seung Shin; Minjeong An; Sunhwa Kim; Jae Lan Shim; Jin-Kyu Park; JinShil Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.