Literature DB >> 2599663

A clinical and roentgenological study of 55 cases of root perforation.

I Kvinnsland, R J Oswald, A Halse, A G Grønningsaeter.   

Abstract

The treatment outcome of 55 root perforations in man were related to pretreatment conditions and various treatment procedures used, with a mean recall period of 3 years 5 months. In this study maxillary teeth were perforated three times more often (74.5 per cent) than mandibular teeth (25.5 per cent); 47 per cent of the perforations were due to endodontic and 53 per cent due to prosthodontic treatment. The buccal and mesial root surfaces as well as the midroot areas were most often perforated. In 25 per cent, radiographic changes were directly related to the perforated areas. Twenty-eight perforations were repaired by orthograde fillings with gutta-percha and Kloro-percha N-phi; eight received a combined orthograde and surgical repair, and in only three cases a surgical approach was used. Four cases received no treatment but were recalled, and twelve perforations showed a size and location hopeless for repair; the teeth were therefore extracted. Five failures of the primary orthograde treatment group later underwent surgical treatment and were followed up for 3 years 3 months. The overall success rate in the primary treatment group of teeth was 56 per cent while 36 per cent became failures. Five failures were retreated, and four of these became successful. A combined orthograde and surgical repair of the perforations provided the most favourable outcome with 92 per cent successful. The study stresses the importance of preventing this type of treatment complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2599663     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00509.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  14 in total

Review 1.  A Review on Perforation Repair Materials.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kamalkishor Kakani; Chandrasekhar Veeramachaneni; Chandrakanth Majeti; Muralidhar Tummala; Laxmi Khiyani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 2.  Root perforations: aetiology, management strategies and outcomes. The hole truth.

Authors:  S Mohammed Saed; M P Ashley; J Darcey
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Management of concomitant strip and apical perforation in mandibular first molar.

Authors:  Mustafa Hussein Al Attas; Thiyezen Abdullah Aldhelai; Muhammad Qasim Javed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.340

4.  Effect of exposure to root canal irrigants on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements.

Authors:  Elena Rebolloso de Barrio; Lucía Gancedo-Caravia; Ernesto García-Barbero; Juan José Pérez-Higueras
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Surgical management of iatrogenic perforation in maxillary central incisor using mineral trioxide aggregate.

Authors:  Rajni Nagpal; Naveen Manuja; I K Pandit; Mandeep Rallan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-10

6.  Furcal perforation repair using calcium enriched mixture cement.

Authors:  Saeed Asgary
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-07

7.  Endo-perio dilemma: a brief review.

Authors:  Preetinder Singh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011

8.  Accuracy of electronic apex locators to detect root canal perforations with inserted metallic posts: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Benjamín Briseño Marroquín; Claudia Cortazar Fernández; Irene Schmidtmann; Brita Willershausen; Fernando Goldberg
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Conservative treatment of a large facial midroot perforation.

Authors:  Stephane Kerner; François Bronnec
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-03-09

10.  Failure of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Detection of Fiber Post Perforation.

Authors:  Mahta Fazlyab; Saeed Asgary
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.