Literature DB >> 25995478

Connections between intraparietal sulcus and a sensorimotor network underpin sustained tactile attention.

Dominique Goltz1, Christopher Gundlach2, Till Nierhaus3, Arno Villringer4, Matthias Müller5, Burkhard Pleger6.   

Abstract

Previous studies on sustained tactile attention draw conclusions about underlying cortical networks by averaging over experimental conditions without considering attentional variance in single trials. This may have formed an imprecise picture of brain processes underpinning sustained tactile attention. In the present study, we simultaneously recorded EEG-fMRI and used modulations of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEPs) as a measure of attentional trial-by-trial variability. Therefore, frequency-tagged streams of vibrotactile stimulations were simultaneously presented to both index fingers. Human participants were cued to sustain attention to either the left or right finger stimulation and to press a button whenever they perceived a target pulse embedded in the to-be-attended stream. In-line with previous studies, a classical general linear model (GLM) analysis based on cued attention conditions revealed increased activity mainly in somatosensory and cerebellar regions. Yet, parametric modeling of the BOLD response using simultaneously recorded SSSEPs as a marker of attentional trial-by-trial variability quarried the intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The IPS in turn showed enhanced functional connectivity to a modality-unspecific attention network. However, this was only revealed on the basis of cued attention conditions in the classical GLM. By considering attentional variability as captured by SSSEPs, the IPS showed increased connectivity to a sensorimotor network, underpinning attentional selection processes between competing tactile stimuli and action choices (press a button or not). Thus, the current findings highlight the potential value by considering attentional variations in single trials and extend previous knowledge on the role of the IPS in tactile attention.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/357938-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; brain connectivity; intraparietal sulcus; simultaneous EEG-fMRI; somatosensation; steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25995478      PMCID: PMC6795193          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3421-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Attention to touch modulates activity in both primary and secondary somatosensory areas.

Authors:  H Johansen-Berg; V Christensen; M Woolrich; P M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses.

Authors:  A Z Snyder
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

Review 3.  Parietal cortex and attention.

Authors:  Marlene Behrmann; Joy J Geng; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking.

Authors:  Saskia Haegens; Verónica Nácher; Rogelio Luna; Ranulfo Romo; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C-M Giabbiconi; N J Trujillo-Barreto; T Gruber; M M Müller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action.

Authors:  H Chris Dijkerman; Edward H F de Haan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar.

Authors:  Hans Otto Karnath; Marc Himmelbach; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Caudate encodes multiple computations for perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Long Ding; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  R Vandenberghe; S Geeraerts; P Molenberghs; C Lafosse; M Vandenbulcke; K Peeters; R Peeters; P Van Hecke; G A Orban
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability.

Authors:  Hanneke van Dijk; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Robert Oostenveld; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Kristjana Hysaj; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Structural and Functional Integrity of the Intraparietal Sulcus in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Chandler Sours; Prashant Raghavan; Alexandre E Medina; Steven Roys; Li Jiang; Jiachen Zhuo; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Effect of Continuous Touch on Brain Functional Connectivity Is Modified by the Operator's Tactile Attention.

Authors:  Francesco Cerritelli; Piero Chiacchiaretta; Francesco Gambi; Antonio Ferretti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Prefrontal and posterior parietal contributions to the perceptual awareness of touch.

Authors:  M Rullmann; S Preusser; B Pleger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention.

Authors:  Stephen Whitmarsh; Christophe Gitton; Veikko Jousmäki; Jérôme Sackur; Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.698

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.