Literature DB >> 11844735

The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar.

Hans Otto Karnath1, Marc Himmelbach, Chris Rorden.   

Abstract

Various studies have documented that right hemispheric lesions restricted to the basal ganglia or to the thalamus may evoke spatial neglect. However, for methodological reasons, the exact anatomical correlate of spatial neglect within these two subcortical structures still remained uncertain. The present study identified these locations by comparing the anatomy of subcortical lesions to the basal ganglia or thalamus between neglect and control patients. Analysis revealed that the putamen, the pulvinar and, to a smaller degree, the caudate nucleus are the subcortical structures typically associated with spatial neglect in humans. All these structures have direct anatomical connections to the superior temporal gyrus (STG), which recently has been identified as the neural correlate of spatial neglect in the human cortex. Therefore, it is assumed that the right putamen, caudate nucleus, pulvinar and STG form a coherent corticosubcortical anatomical network in the genesis of spatial neglect in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11844735     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  122 in total

Review 1.  Hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  A Parton; P Malhotra; M Husain
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  The role of the pulvinar in distractor processing and visual search.

Authors:  Hendrick Strumpf; George R Mangun; Carsten N Boehler; Christian Stoppel; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens-Max Hopf
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Differential white matter involvement associated with distinct visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Alex R Carter; Mark P McAvoy; Joshua S Siegel; Xin Hong; Serguei V Astafiev; Jennifer Rengachary; Kristi Zinn; Nicholas V Metcalf; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 4.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Mark A Pinsk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The anatomy of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Influence of age, lesion volume, and damage to dorsal versus ventral streams to viewer- and stimulus-centered hemispatial neglect in acute right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Adrian Suarez; Sadhvi Saxena; Kenichi Oishi; Kumiko Oishi; Alexandra Walker; Chris Rorden; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 9.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Contributions of the human pulvinar to linking vision and action.

Authors:  Shai Danziger; Robert Ward; Vanessa Owen; Robert Rafal
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.