Literature DB >> 25995462

Decoding actions at different levels of abstraction.

Moritz F Wurm1, Angelika Lingnau2.   

Abstract

Brain regions that mediate action understanding must contain representations that are action specific and at the same time tolerate a wide range of perceptual variance. Whereas progress has been made in understanding such generalization mechanisms in the object domain, the neural mechanisms to conceptualize actions remain unknown. In particular, there is ongoing dissent between motor-centric and cognitive accounts whether premotor cortex or brain regions in closer relation to perceptual systems, i.e., lateral occipitotemporal cortex, contain neural populations with such mapping properties. To date, it is unclear to which degree action-specific representations in these brain regions generalize from concrete action instantiations to abstract action concepts. However, such information would be crucial to differentiate between motor and cognitive theories. Using ROI-based and searchlight-based fMRI multivoxel pattern decoding, we sought brain regions in human cortex that manage the balancing act between specificity and generality. We investigated a concrete level that distinguishes actions based on perceptual features (e.g., opening vs closing a specific bottle), an intermediate level that generalizes across movement kinematics and specific objects involved in the action (e.g., opening different bottles with cork or screw cap), and an abstract level that additionally generalizes across object category (e.g., opening bottles or boxes). We demonstrate that the inferior parietal and occipitotemporal cortex code actions at abstract levels whereas the premotor cortex codes actions at the concrete level only. Hence, occipitotemporal, but not premotor, regions fulfill the necessary criteria for action understanding. This result is compatible with cognitive theories but strongly undermines motor theories of action understanding.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/357727-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; action concepts; action understanding; fMRI; motor system; occipitotemporal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25995462      PMCID: PMC6795187          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0188-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  44 in total

1.  Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework.

Authors:  Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI.

Authors:  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold.

Authors:  S D Forman; J D Cohen; M Fitzgerald; W F Eddy; M A Mintun; D C Noll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Abstract categories of functions in anterior parietal lobe.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Beyond action-specific simulation: domain-general motor contributions to perception.

Authors:  Clare Press; Richard Cook
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Action concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Eileen R Cardillo; Geena R Ianni; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Viewpoint (in)dependence of action representations: an MVPA study.

Authors:  Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Steven P Tipper; Paul E Downing
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The origin of word-related motor activity.

Authors:  Liuba Papeo; Angelika Lingnau; Sara Agosta; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  When does action comprehension need motor involvement? Evidence from upper limb aplasia.

Authors:  Gilles Vannuscorps; Michael Andres; Agnesa Pillon
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  37 in total

1.  The neural bases of different levels of action understanding.

Authors:  Michelle Marneweck; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Large-Scale Organization of Gestures and Words in the Middle Temporal Gyrus.

Authors:  Liuba Papeo; Beatrice Agostini; Angelika Lingnau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Timing of grip and goal activation during action perception: a priming study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Selective Modulation of Early Visual Cortical Activity by Movement Intention.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel J Gale; J Randall Flanagan; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The Neural Representations of Movement across Semantic Categories.

Authors:  Valentina Borghesani; Marianna Riello; Benno Gesierich; Valentina Brentari; Alessia Monti; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Motor activation during action perception depends on action interpretation.

Authors:  Barbara Pomiechowska; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Hand-independent representation of tool-use pantomimes in the left anterior intraparietal cortex.

Authors:  Kenji Ogawa; Fumihito Imai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The neurocognitive basis of knowledge about object identity and events: dissociations reflect opposing effects of semantic coherence and control.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jefferies; Hannah Thompson; Piers Cornelissen; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Reduced competition between tool action neighbors in left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Harrison Stoll; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; John C Trueswell; Brent Strickland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.