Literature DB >> 23597797

Preconsultation exchange for ambulatory hepatology consultations.

Justin L Sewell1, Jennifer Guy, Annette Kwon, Alice Hm Chen, Hal F Yee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preconsultation exchange is an emerging model of specialty care proposed by the American College of Physicians that seeks to answer a clinical question without a formal patient visit to the specialty clinic. This form of specialty care has been little studied. We sought to determine the appropriateness of preconsultation exchange for ambulatory hepatology consultations within our urban health care system.
METHODS: Retrospective study of referrals for ambulatory hepatology consultation in the safety net health care system of San Francisco, Calif from January 2007 through April 2010.
RESULTS: Of the 500 referrals reviewed, 87 were excluded as repeat requests. The most common reasons for referral were hepatitis B (34.9%) and hepatitis C (32.0%). Fifty-six referrals (13.6%) were appropriate for preconsultation exchange, and 190 (46.0%) were inappropriate for preconsultation exchange. One hundred sixty-seven (40.4%) referrals did not include enough information to determine appropriateness for preconsultation exchange. Most of these (83.8%) were made for hepatitis B or hepatitis C, despite the presence of explicit referral guidelines. Midlevel providers were more likely than physicians to provide enough information to determine appropriateness for preconsultation exchange.
CONCLUSION: In our urban health care system, preconsultation exchange appears to be an appropriate form of specialty care for some ambulatory hepatology consultations. Communication between primary care provider and specialist appears to be an important barrier to broader implementation of preconsultation exchange. Optimizing the preconsultation exchange is critical to improve the primary-specialty care interface, and to build a true Patient-Centered Medical Home Neighborhood.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597797      PMCID: PMC3684175          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  20 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.

Authors:  L R Harrold; T S Field; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Barriers to care among racial/ethnic groups under managed care.

Authors:  K A Phillips; M L Mayer; L A Aday
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  "Lost to follow-up": the public health goals of accountable care.

Authors:  Neil S Calman; Diane Hauser; Dave A Chokshi
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-09

Review 4.  High and rising health care costs. Part 1: seeking an explanation.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Exploring the generalist-subspecialist interface in internal medicine.

Authors:  Mark Linzer; Robert J Myerburg; Jean S Kutner; C Mel Wilcox; Eugene Oddone; Raphael J DeHoratius; Gerald V Naccarelli
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Golden gate to health care for all? San Francisco's new universal-access program.

Authors:  Mitchell H Katz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A typology of specialists' clinical roles.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-08

9.  Health care reform requires accountable care systems.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system.

Authors:  Yeuen Kim; Alice Hm Chen; Ellen Keith; Hal F Yee; Margot B Kushel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficiency Gains for Rheumatology Consultation Using a Novel Electronic Referral System in a Safety-Net Health Setting.

Authors:  Meghan M Scheibe; John B Imboden; Gabriela Schmajuk; Mary Margaretten; Jonathan D Graf; Alice H Chen; Edward H Yelin; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Understanding the Potential for Patient Engagement in Electronic Consultation and Referral Systems: Lessons From One Safety Net System.

Authors:  Jacqueline Nwando Olayiwola; Margae Knox; Kate Dubé; Emily Chen-Yuan Lu; Tem Woldeyesus; Iguehi E James; Rachel Willard-Grace; Delphine Tuot
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Varsha G Vimalananda; Gouri Gupte; Siamak M Seraj; Jay Orlander; Dan Berlowitz; Benjamin G Fincke; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  A cohort study of a general surgery electronic consultation system: safety implications and impact on surgical yield.

Authors:  Jesus G Ulloa; Marika D Russell; Alice Hm Chen; Delphine S Tuot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Electronic Consultations to Hepatologists Reduce Wait Time for Visits, Improve Communication, and Result in Cost Savings.

Authors:  Indira Bhavsar; Jennifer Wang; Sean M Burke; Kimberly Dowdell; R Ann Hays; Nicolas M Intagliata
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2019-07-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.