Literature DB >> 25994573

Potential clinical relevance of uPA and PAI-1 levels in node-negative, postmenopausal breast cancer patients bearing histological grade II tumors with ER/PR expression, during an early follow-up.

Marko Buta1, Radan Džodić1,2, Igor Đurišić1, Ivan Marković1,2, Tijana Vujasinović3, Milan Markićević4, Dragica Nikolić-Vukosavljević3.   

Abstract

We evaluated urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) prognostic value in postmenopausal, node-negative breast cancer patients bearing tumors with estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) expression, treated with locoregional therapy alone, within an early follow-up. We focused our analysis on tumors of histological grade II in order to improve its prognostic value and, consequently, to improve a decision-making process. The cytosol extracts of 73 tumor samples were used for assessing several biomarkers. ER and PR levels were measured by classical biochemical method. Cathepsin D was assayed by a radiometric immunoassay while both uPA and PAI-1 level determinations were performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. HER-2 gene amplification was determined by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in primary tumor tissue. Patients bearing tumors smaller than or equal to 2 cm (pT1) or those with low PAI-1 levels (PAI-1 < 6.35 pg/mg) showed favorable outcome compared to patients bearing tumors greater than 2 cm (pT2,3) or those with high PAI-1 levels, respectively. Analyses of 4 phenotypes, defined by tumor size and PAI-1 status, revealed that patients bearing either pT1 tumors, irrespective of PAI-1 levels, or pT2,3 tumors with low PAI-1 levels, had similar disease-free interval probabilities and showed favorable outcome compared to those bearing pT2,3 tumors with high PAI-1 levels. Our findings suggest that tumor size and PAI-1, used in combination as phenotypes are not only prognostic but might also be predictive in node-negative, postmenopausal breast cancer patients bearing histological grade II tumors with ER/PR expression, during an early follow-up period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Early follow-up; Locoregional therapy; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25994573     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3573-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  36 in total

1.  Tumor marker assessment: points to ponder.

Authors:  Yesim Gökmen-Polar; Sunil Badve
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 2.  Dormancy and surgery-driven escape from dormancy help explain some clinical features of breast cancer.

Authors:  M W Retsky; R Demicheli; W J M Hrushesky; M Baum; I D Gukas
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Dormancy of mammary carcinoma after mastectomy.

Authors:  T G Karrison; D J Ferguson; P Meier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-01-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Tumor markers in breast cancer- European Group on Tumor Markers recommendations.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Vivian Barak; Arie van Dalen; Michael J Duffy; Roland Einarsson; Massimo Gion; Helenka Goike; Rolf Lamerz; Marius Nap; György Sölétormos; Petra Stieber
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Authors:  D G Altman; B Lausen; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Revision of the standards for the assessment of hormone receptors in human breast cancer; report of the second E.O.R.T.C. Workshop, held on 16-17 March, 1979, in the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Comparison of microarray-based RNA expression with ELISA-based protein determination of HER2, uPA and PAI-1 in tumour tissue of patients with breast cancer and relation to outcome.

Authors:  Isabell D Witzel; Karin Milde-Langosch; Ralph M Wirtz; Claudia Roth; Maike Ihnen; Sven Mahner; Christine Zu Eulenburg; Fritz Jänicke; Volkmar Müller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  The apparent uPA/PAI-1 paradox in cancer: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Hau C Kwaan; Andrew P Mazar; Brandon J McMahon
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.180

9.  Metastatic breast cancer survival according to HER2 and Topo2a gene status.

Authors:  N Todorović-Raković; Z Nesković-Konstantinović; D Nikolić-Vukosavljević
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Grading breast cancer tissues using molecular portraits.

Authors:  Niclas Olsson; Petter Carlsson; Peter James; Karin Hansson; Sofia Waldemarson; Per Malmström; Mårten Fernö; Lisa Ryden; Christer Wingren; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diabetes-associated dysregulated cytokines and cancer.

Authors:  Yong Wu; Yanjun Liu; Yunzhou Dong; Jay Vadgama
Journal:  Integr Cancer Sci Ther       Date:  2016-02-15

2.  Assessment of Ki67 and uPA/PAI-1 expression in intermediate-risk early stage breast cancers.

Authors:  Elise Deluche; Laurence Venat-Bouvet; Sophie Leobon; Veronique Fermeaux; Joelle Mollard; Nadira Saidi; Isabelle Jammet; Yves Aubard; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Prognostic significance of uPA/PAI-1 level, HER2 status, and traditional histologic factors for survival in node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Nina Fokter Dovnik; Iztok Takac
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Levels of uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer and its correlation to Ki67-index and results of a 21-multigene-array.

Authors:  Hans-Ullrich Völker; Michael Weigel; Annette Strehl; Lea Frey
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.644

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.