| Literature DB >> 25992571 |
Harold Mouras1, Thierry Lelard2, Said Ahmaidi2, Olivier Godefroy3, Pierre Krystkowiak4.
Abstract
Posturographic changes in motivational conditions remain largely unexplored in the context of embodied cognition. Over the last decade, sexual motivation has been used as a good canonical working model to study motivated social interactions. The objective of this study was to explore posturographic variations in response to visual sexual videos as compared to neutral videos. Our results support demonstration of a freezing-type response in response to sexually explicit stimuli compared to other conditions, as demonstrated by significantly decreased standard deviations for (i) the center of pressure displacement along the mediolateral and anteroposterior axes and (ii) center of pressure's displacement surface. These results support the complexity of the motor correlates of sexual motivation considered to be a canonical functional context to study the motor correlates of motivated social interactions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25992571 PMCID: PMC4439164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mean motor indices in response to various stimuli.
| Appetitive | Neutral | Humorous | |
|---|---|---|---|
| COP-ML[ | 0.87 (1.96) | 0.60 (1.62) | -1.45 (1.91) |
| Amp [COP]-ML[ | 21.28 (9.08) | 30.13 (15.14) | 30.01 (12.36) |
| COP-AP[ | 0.37 (3.59) | -0.79 (2.64) | 1.13 (4.00) |
| Amp [COP]-AP[ | 30.61 (10.58) | 36.45 (16.25) | 36.17 (13.63) |
| COP-Area[ | 241.09 (147.85) | 456.13 (383.09) | 391.23 (253.71) |
| SD [COP]-ML[ | 3.30 (1.15) | 4.47 (2.03) | 4.36 (1.38) |
| SD [COP]-AP[ | 4.95 (1.55) | 6.22 (2.68) | 5.91 (1.87) |
1: COP position in the anteroposterior direction;
2: Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the mediolateral direction;
3: COP position in the mediolateral direction;
4: Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the anteroposterior direction;
5: Area encompassed by displacements of the COP;
6: Standard displacement of the COP in the mediolateral direction;
7: Standard displacement of the COP in the anteroposterior direction. Number in bracket is the Standard Deviation.
Fig 1Mean ± SD for postural indices as a function of the stimulus (A) Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the mediolateral direction (Amp [COP]-ML) (B) Amplitude of the sway of the COP in the anteroposterior direction (Amp [COP]-AP) (C) Standard displacement of the COP in the mediolateral direction (SD [COP]-ML) (D) Standard displacement of the COP in the anteroposterior direction (SD [COP]-AP) (E) Area encompassed by displacements of the COP (COP-Area) Significant differences are indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p<0.01 when comparing stimulus.