Literature DB >> 25992262

Simplified type 3 implant placement, after alveolar ridge preservation: a case study.

F Cecchetti1, F Germano1, F N Bartuli1, L Arcuri1, M Spuntarelli1.   

Abstract

Alveolar ridge, after tooth extraction, could reduce its volume up to 50% in buccal-lingual width in the first twelve months and residual dimensions could interfere with correct three dimensional placement of implants and influence negatively treatment outcomes with regard to function and aesthetic aspects. Over the last decades, several approaches have been proposed and tested in order to prevent ridge volumetric contraction and provide maximum bone availability for implant procedure. This article presents a case study with a single anterior tooth replacement, illustrating socket seal technique followed by a type 3 timing implant placement. Immediately after tooth extraction, residual socket was grafted using Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral and a free gingival punch harvested from palate. After 3 months, a root-form titanium implant was inserted without additional regenerative procedures. Follow-up examination revealed favourable preservation of soft tissue width and height in the aesthetic area. Socket seal approach maximizes soft tissue healing, preserving ridge envelope and the subsequent implant placement, furthermore, results simplified, as any augmentation techniques are required. Clinical advantages of this method include predictable preservation of the soft tissues, favourable healing features, easy handling of graft materials and a positive benefit-cost ratio.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gbr; ridge preservation; socket preservation

Year:  2015        PMID: 25992262      PMCID: PMC4402685     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)        ISSN: 1974-5648


  12 in total

1.  Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review.

Authors:  Fabio Vignoletti; Paula Matesanz; Daniel Rodrigo; Elena Figuero; Conchita Martin; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Mauricio G Araújo; Massimo Simion
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations.

Authors:  Daniel Buser; William Martin; Urs C Belser
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M A G Ten Heggeler; D E Slot; G A Van der Weijden
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 5.  Ridge preservation: what is it and when should it be considered.

Authors:  I Darby; S Chen; R De Poi
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.291

Review 6.  Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fridus Van der Weijden; Federico Dell'Acqua; Dagmar Else Slot
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 7.  Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Avila-Ortiz; S Elangovan; K W O Kramer; D Blanchette; D V Dawson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 8.  A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans.

Authors:  Wah Lay Tan; Terry L T Wong; May C M Wong; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Postextraction tissue management: a soft tissue punch technique.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; David W Siegenthaler; Christoph H F Hämmerle
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy.

Authors:  Ivan Darby; Stephen T Chen; Daniel Buser
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  2 in total

1.  Full digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report.

Authors:  L Arcuri; C Lorenzi; F Cecchetti; F Germano; M Spuntarelli; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

2.  Postextraction computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentate patients with metal restorations: a case report.

Authors:  A Pinto; C Raffone
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-04-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.