Literature DB >> 25989407

Exploring the factors influencing clinical students' self-regulated learning.

Joris J Berkhout1, Esther Helmich1, Pim W Teunissen2,3, Joost W van den Berg1, Cees P M van der Vleuten2, A Debbie C Jaarsma1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The importance of self-regulated learning (SRL) has been broadly recognised by medical education institutions and regulatory bodies. Supporting the development of SRL skills has proven difficult because self-regulation is a complex interactive process and we know relatively little about the factors influencing this process in real practice settings. The aim of our study was therefore to identify factors that support or hamper medical students' SRL in a clinical context.
METHODS: We conducted a constructivist grounded theory study using semi-structured interviews with 17 medical students from two universities enrolled in clerkships. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure variety in age, gender, experience and current clerkship. The Day Reconstruction Method was used to help participants remember their activities of the previous day. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed iteratively using constant comparison and open, axial and interpretive coding.
RESULTS: Self-regulated learning by students in the clinical environment was influenced by the specific goals perceived by students, the autonomy they experienced, the learning opportunities they were given or created themselves, and the anticipated outcomes of an activity. All of these factors were affected by personal, contextual and social attributes.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-regulated learning of medical students in the clinical environment is different for every individual. The factors influencing this process are affected by personal, social and contextual attributes. Some of these are similar to those known from previous research in classroom settings, but others are unique to the clinical environment and include the facilities available, the role of patients, and social relationships pertaining to peers and other hospital staff. To better support students' SRL, we believe it is important to increase students' metacognitive awareness and to offer students more tailored learning opportunities.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989407     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  24 in total

1.  Neonatal septic arthritis: Indian perspective.

Authors:  Akash Rai; Debrup Chakladar; Souravi Bhowmik; Tanushree Mondal; Arnab Nandy; Biplab Maji; Avijit Hazra; Rakesh Mondal
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09-05

2.  Adaptive expertise: The optimal outcome of emergency medicine training.

Authors:  Jeremy Branzetti; Michael A Gisondi; Laura R Hopson; Linda Regan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Impact of antiphospholipid syndrome iBook on medical students' improvement of knowledge: An international randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Stephane Zuily; Laurent Phialy; Ecem Sevim; Eloïse Germain; Ozan Unlu; Virginie Dufrost; Jessie Risse; Isabelle Clerc-Urmès; Cédric Baumann; Jessica R Berman; Michael D Lockshin; Denis Wahl; Doruk Erkan
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09-05

Review 4.  The self-regulated learning of medical students in the clinical environment - a scoping review.

Authors:  Kenneth K Cho; Brahm Marjadi; Vicki Langendyk; Wendy Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Guidelines: The do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Rose Hatala; Karen E Hauer; Eric Holmboe
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  Learning outcomes for communication skills across the health professions: a systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Charlotte Denniston; Elizabeth Molloy; Debra Nestel; Robyn Woodward-Kron; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patterns in clinical students' self-regulated learning behavior: a Q-methodology study.

Authors:  Joris J Berkhout; Pim W Teunissen; Esther Helmich; Job van Exel; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Debbie A D C Jaarsma
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.853

8.  How clinical medical students perceive others to influence their self-regulated learning.

Authors:  Joris J Berkhout; Esther Helmich; Pim W Teunissen; Cees P M van der Vleuten; A Debbie C Jaarsma
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 9.  Self-regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maaike A van Houten-Schat; Joris J Berkhout; Nynke van Dijk; Maaike D Endedijk; A Debbie C Jaarsma; Agnes D Diemers
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  You can have both: Coaching to promote clinical competency and professional identity formation.

Authors:  Andrew S Parsons; Rachel H Kon; Margaret Plews-Ogan; Maryellen E Gusic
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.