| Literature DB >> 25989371 |
Yuting Liang1, Yuji Jiang1, Feng Wang1, Chongqing Wen2, Ye Deng3, Kai Xue2, Yujia Qin2, Yunfeng Yang4, Liyou Wu2, Jizhong Zhou2,4,5, Bo Sun1.
Abstract
To understand soil microbial community stability and temporal turnover in response to climate change, a long-term soil transplant experiment was conducted in three agricultural experiment stations over large transects from a warm temperate zone (Fengqiu station in central China) to a subtropical zone (Yingtan station in southern China) and a cold temperate zone (Hailun station in northern China). Annual soil samples were collected from these three stations from 2005 to 2011, and microbial communities were analyzed by sequencing microbial 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicons using Illumina MiSeq technology. Our results revealed a distinctly differential pattern of microbial communities in both northward and southward transplantations, along with an increase in microbial richness with climate cooling and a corresponding decrease with climate warming. The microbial succession rate was estimated by the slope (w value) of linear regression of a log-transformed microbial community similarity with time (time-decay relationship). Compared with the low turnover rate of microbial communities in situ (w=0.046, P<0.001), the succession rate at the community level was significantly higher in the northward transplant (w=0.058, P<0.001) and highest in the southward transplant (w=0.094, P<0.001). Climate warming lead to a faster succession rate of microbial communities as well as lower species richness and compositional changes compared with in situ and climate cooling, which may be related to the high metabolic rates and intense competition under higher temperature. This study provides new insights into the impacts of climate change on the fundamental temporal scaling of soil microbial communities and microbial phylogenetic biodiversity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25989371 PMCID: PMC4817637 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Figure 1(a) Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination based on Bray–Curtis distances showing the changes in microbial community composition with northward (square) and southward transplant (triangle) compared with microbial community in original Fengqiu station (circle). Color from deep to shallow represents the community succession from year 2005 to 2011. (b) Small differences among samples (based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity) were linearly enlarged along as time elapsed. The lines denote the linear regression. Square symbols represent differences between northward and in situ samples; triangle symbols represent differences between southward and in situ samples; circle symbols represent differences northward and southward samples.
Figure 2Time–decay curves for soil microbial communities. The slopes of all lines are significantly less than zero and significantly different for pairwise comparison.
Figure 3Relationships of temporal turnover w values (exponent of time–decay relationship) with (a) temperature, (b) time duration and (c) abundance at phylum level.
Temporal turnover (w values) of bacterial communities among different phylogenetic groups
| In situ | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w | P | t | P | P | t | P | w | P | t | P | ||
| All OTUs | 0.046 | <0.001 | −115 | <0.001 | 0.058 | <0.001 | −141 | <0.001 | 0.094 | <0.001 | −184 | <0.001 |
| Acidobacteria | 0.020 | <0.001 | −86 | <0.001 | 0.038 | <0.001 | −101 | <0.001 | 0.054 | <0.001 | −157 | <0.001 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.018 | 0.043 | −46 | <0.001 | 0.058 | <0.001 | −122 | <0.001 | 0.084 | <0.001 | −189 | <0.001 |
| Armatimonadetes | 0.038 | 0.076 | −36 | <0.001 | 0.064 | 0.011 | −59 | <0.001 | 0.200 | <0.001 | -159 | <0.001 |
| Bacteroidetes | 0.076 | <0.001 | −98 | <0.001 | 0.120 | <0.001 | −166 | <0.001 | 0.210 | <0.001 | −154 | <0.001 |
| Chloroflexi | 0.036 | <0.001 | −73 | <0.001 | 0.048 | <0.001 | −83 | <0.001 | 0.144 | <0.001 | −167 | <0.001 |
| Firmicutes | 0.014 | 0.011 | −54 | <0.001 | 0.038 | <0.001 | −90 | <0.001 | 0.064 | <0.001 | −121 | <0.001 |
| Gemmatimonadetes | 0.034 | 0.006 | −59 | <0.001 | 0.070 | <0.001 | −129 | <0.001 | 0.088 | <0.001 | −133 | <0.001 |
| Nitrospira | 0.014 | 0.066 | −41 | <0.001 | 0.020 | 0.006 | −60 | <0.001 | 0.046 | <0.001 | −103 | <0.001 |
| Planctomycetes | 0.042 | <0.001 | −116 | <0.001 | 0.050 | <0.001 | −144 | <0.001 | 0.110 | <0.001 | −178 | <0.001 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.038 | <0.001 | −99 | <0.001 | 0.076 | <0.001 | −164 | <0.001 | 0.130 | <0.001 | −181 | <0.001 |
| Proteobacteria | 0.082 | <0.001 | −170 | <0.001 | 0.084 | <0.001 | −164 | <0.001 | 0.098 | <0.001 | −220 | <0.001 |
t and P-values are from one-sample t-tests on bootstrapping (999 times) for testing significance of w values.
Figure 4Circular maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on OTU representative sequences of bacteria detected in all samples in situ and with northward and southward transplant. The bars in the outer band represent the OTU numbers.
Mantel test and partial Mantel test results to discern correlation between the bacterial community similarity and either soil geochemical variables (pH, CEC, SOM, available potassium and NO3 −), plant aboveground biomass and temperature
| All variables | 0.472* | 0.217* | |||||
| Soil geochemical variables | Plant and climate | 0.576* | 0.199* | ||||
| Plant biomass | Soil and climate | ||||||
| Temperature | Soil and plant | 0.708** | 0.279** | 0.367*** | 0.421** | 0.427*** | |
| All variables | 0.560* | ||||||
| Soil geochemical variables | Plant and climate | ||||||
| Plant | Soil and climate | ||||||
| Temperature | Soil and plant | 0.184* | |||||
| All variables | 0.742* | 0.382* | 0.424** | ||||
| Soil geochemical variables | Plant and climate | 0.637** | 0.254* | 0.224* | 0.364** | 0.217* | |
| Plant | Soil and climate | 0.197* | 0.21* | ||||
| Temperature | Soil and plant | ||||||
| All variables | 0.789*** | 0.50** | 0.564** | 0.586*** | 0.316* | ||
| Soil geochemical variables | Plant and climate | 0.339* | 0.448** | ||||
| Plant | Soil and climate | ||||||
| Temperature | Soil and plant | 0.880*** | 0.5** | 0.60*** | 0.477** | 0.486*** | |
*<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001. Only significant correlations were shown in the table.