Erin R Rudzinski1, James R Anderson, Douglas S Hawkins, Stephen X Skapek, David M Parham, Lisa A Teot. 1. From the Department of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington (Dr Rudzinski); Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation, Inc, Madison, Wisconsin (Dr Anderson); the University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle (Dr Hawkins); the Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Dr Skapek); the Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (Dr Parham); and the Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Teot).
Abstract
CONTEXT: The World Health Organization Classification Since 1995, the International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma has provided prognostically relevant classification for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and allowed risk stratification for children with RMS. The International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma includes botryoid and spindle cell RMS as superior-risk groups, embryonal RMS as an intermediate-risk group, and alveolar RMS as an unfavorable-risk group. The 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of skeletal muscle tumors modified the histologic classification of RMS to include sclerosing RMS as a type of spindle cell RMS separate from embryonal RMS. The current WHO classification includes embryonal, alveolar, spindle cell/sclerosing, and pleomorphic subtypes of RMS and does not separate the botryoid subtype. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the WHO classification applies to pediatric RMS. DESIGN: To accomplish this goal, we reviewed 9 consecutive Children's Oncology Group clinical trials to compare the WHO and International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma classifications with outcome and site of disease. RESULTS: Except for a subset of low-risk RMS, the outcome for botryoid was not significantly different from typical embryonal RMS when analyzed by primary site. Similarly, pediatric spindle cell and sclerosing patterns of RMS did not appear significantly different from typical embryonal RMS, with one exception: spindle cell RMS in the parameningeal region had an inferior outcome with 28% event-free survival. CONCLUSION: Our data support use of the WHO RMS classification in the pediatric population, with the caveat that histologic diagnosis does not necessarily confer the same prognostic information in children as in adults.
CONTEXT: The World Health Organization Classification Since 1995, the International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma has provided prognostically relevant classification for rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and allowed risk stratification for children with RMS. The International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma includes botryoid and spindle cell RMS as superior-risk groups, embryonal RMS as an intermediate-risk group, and alveolar RMS as an unfavorable-risk group. The 2013 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of skeletal muscle tumors modified the histologic classification of RMS to include sclerosing RMS as a type of spindle cell RMS separate from embryonal RMS. The current WHO classification includes embryonal, alveolar, spindle cell/sclerosing, and pleomorphic subtypes of RMS and does not separate the botryoid subtype. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the WHO classification applies to pediatric RMS. DESIGN: To accomplish this goal, we reviewed 9 consecutive Children's Oncology Group clinical trials to compare the WHO and International Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma classifications with outcome and site of disease. RESULTS: Except for a subset of low-risk RMS, the outcome for botryoid was not significantly different from typical embryonal RMS when analyzed by primary site. Similarly, pediatric spindle cell and sclerosing patterns of RMS did not appear significantly different from typical embryonal RMS, with one exception: spindle cell RMS in the parameningeal region had an inferior outcome with 28% event-free survival. CONCLUSION: Our data support use of the WHO RMS classification in the pediatric population, with the caveat that histologic diagnosis does not necessarily confer the same prognostic information in children as in adults.
Authors: R Beverly Raney; David O Walterhouse; Jane L Meza; Richard J Andrassy; John C Breneman; William M Crist; Harold M Maurer; William H Meyer; David M Parham; James R Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alberto S Pappo; Elizabeth Lyden; Phillip Breitfeld; Sarah S Donaldson; Eugene Wiener; David Parham; Kristine R Crews; Peter Houghton; William H Meyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen X Skapek; James Anderson; Frederic G Barr; Julia A Bridge; Julie M Gastier-Foster; David M Parham; Erin R Rudzinski; Timothy Triche; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Erin R Rudzinski; Lisa A Teot; James R Anderson; Julie Moore; Julia A Bridge; Frederic G Barr; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Stephen X Skapek; Douglas S Hawkins; David M Parham Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Karoly Szuhai; Daniëlle de Jong; Wai Yi Leung; Christopher D M Fletcher; Pancras C W Hogendoorn Journal: J Pathol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Xiang Chen; Elizabeth Stewart; Anang A Shelat; Chunxu Qu; Armita Bahrami; Mark Hatley; Gang Wu; Cori Bradley; Justina McEvoy; Alberto Pappo; Sheri Spunt; Marcus B Valentine; Virginia Valentine; Fred Krafcik; Walter H Lang; Monika Wierdl; Lyudmila Tsurkan; Viktor Tolleman; Sara M Federico; Chris Morton; Charles Lu; Li Ding; John Easton; Michael Rusch; Panduka Nagahawatte; Jianmin Wang; Matthew Parker; Lei Wei; Erin Hedlund; David Finkelstein; Michael Edmonson; Sheila Shurtleff; Kristy Boggs; Heather Mulder; Donald Yergeau; Steve Skapek; Douglas S Hawkins; Nilsa Ramirez; Philip M Potter; John A Sandoval; Andrew M Davidoff; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Jinghui Zhang; James R Downing; Michael A Dyer Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Michael A Arnold; James R Anderson; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Frederic G Barr; Stephen X Skapek; Douglas S Hawkins; R Beverly Raney; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Erin R Rudzinski; David O Walterhouse Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Adepitan A Owosho; Shih-Chiang Huang; Sonja Chen; Shruti Kashikar; Cherry L Estilo; Suzanne L Wolden; Leonard H Wexler; Joseph M Huryn; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Rita Alaggio; Lei Zhang; Yun-Shao Sung; Shih-Chiang Huang; Chun-Liang Chen; Gianni Bisogno; Angelica Zin; Narasimhan P Agaram; Michael P LaQuaglia; Leonard H Wexler; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Joanne L Tuohy; Brittney J Byer; Suzanne Royer; Charles Keller; Margaret A Nagai-Singer; Daniel P Regan; Bernard Seguin Journal: Vet Pathol Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 2.221