Michael A Arnold1,2, James R Anderson3, Julie M Gastier-Foster1,2, Frederic G Barr4, Stephen X Skapek5, Douglas S Hawkins6,7, R Beverly Raney8, David M Parham9, Lisa A Teot10, Erin R Rudzinski11, David O Walterhouse12. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. 2. Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio. 3. Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Madison, Wisconsin. 4. Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Department of Hematology and Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington. 7. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 8. Children's Cancer Hospital and Division of Pediatrics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 9. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 10. Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 11. Department of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington. 12. Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) from embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) is of prognostic and therapeutic importance. Criteria for classifying these entities evolved significantly from 1995 to 2013. ARMS is associated with inferior outcome; therefore, patients with alveolar histology have generally been excluded from low-risk therapy. However, patients with ARMS and low-risk stage and group (Stage 1, Group I/II/orbit III; or Stage 2/3, Group I/II) were eligible for the Children's Oncology Group (COG) low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) study D9602 from 1997 to 1999. The characteristics and outcomes of these patients have not been previously reported, and the histology of these cases has not been reviewed using current criteria. PROCEDURE: We re-reviewed cases that were classified as ARMS on D9602 using current histologic criteria, determined PAX3/PAX7-FOXO1 fusion status, and compared these data with outcome for this unique group of patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with ARMS were enrolled onto D9602. Only one-third of cases with slides available for re-review (11/33) remained classified as ARMS by current histologic criteria. Most cases were reclassified as ERMS (17/33, 51.5%). Cases that remained classified as ARMS were typically fusion-positive (8/11, 73%), therefore current classification results in a similar rate of fusion-positive ARMS for all clinical risk groups. In conjunction with data from COG intermediate-risk treatment protocol D9803, our data demonstrate excellent outcomes for fusion-negative ARMS with otherwise low-risk clinical features. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fusion-positive RMS with low-risk clinical features should be classified and treated as intermediate risk, while patients with fusion-negative ARMS could be appropriately treated with reduced intensity therapy.
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) from embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) is of prognostic and therapeutic importance. Criteria for classifying these entities evolved significantly from 1995 to 2013. ARMS is associated with inferior outcome; therefore, patients with alveolar histology have generally been excluded from low-risk therapy. However, patients with ARMS and low-risk stage and group (Stage 1, Group I/II/orbit III; or Stage 2/3, Group I/II) were eligible for the Children's Oncology Group (COG) low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) study D9602 from 1997 to 1999. The characteristics and outcomes of these patients have not been previously reported, and the histology of these cases has not been reviewed using current criteria. PROCEDURE: We re-reviewed cases that were classified as ARMS on D9602 using current histologic criteria, determined PAX3/PAX7-FOXO1 fusion status, and compared these data with outcome for this unique group of patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with ARMS were enrolled onto D9602. Only one-third of cases with slides available for re-review (11/33) remained classified as ARMS by current histologic criteria. Most cases were reclassified as ERMS (17/33, 51.5%). Cases that remained classified as ARMS were typically fusion-positive (8/11, 73%), therefore current classification results in a similar rate of fusion-positive ARMS for all clinical risk groups. In conjunction with data from COG intermediate-risk treatment protocol D9803, our data demonstrate excellent outcomes for fusion-negative ARMS with otherwise low-risk clinical features. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with fusion-positive RMS with low-risk clinical features should be classified and treated as intermediate risk, while patients with fusion-negative ARMS could be appropriately treated with reduced intensity therapy.
Authors: Jun Nishio; Pamela A Althof; Jacqueline M Bailey; Ming Zhou; James R Neff; Frederic G Barr; David M Parham; Lisa Teot; Stephen J Qualman; Julia A Bridge Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Frederic G Barr; Lynette M Smith; James C Lynch; Donna Strzelecki; David M Parham; Stephen J Qualman; Philip P Breitfeld Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Poul H B Sorensen; James C Lynch; Stephen J Qualman; Roberto Tirabosco; Jerian F Lim; Harold M Maurer; Julia A Bridge; William M Crist; Timothy J Triche; Frederic G Barr Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Beverly Raney; David O Walterhouse; Jane L Meza; Richard J Andrassy; John C Breneman; William M Crist; Harold M Maurer; William H Meyer; David M Parham; James R Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carola A S Arndt; Julie A Stoner; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Charles N Paidas; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Moody D Wharam; John C Breneman; Sarah S Donaldson; James R Anderson; William H Meyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen X Skapek; James Anderson; Frederic G Barr; Julia A Bridge; Julie M Gastier-Foster; David M Parham; Erin R Rudzinski; Timothy Triche; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: W A Newton; E A Gehan; B L Webber; H B Marsden; A J van Unnik; A B Hamoudi; M G Tsokos; H Shimada; D Harms; D Schmidt Journal: Cancer Date: 1995-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Erin R Rudzinski; Lisa A Teot; James R Anderson; Julie Moore; Julia A Bridge; Frederic G Barr; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Stephen X Skapek; Douglas S Hawkins; David M Parham Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Karoly Szuhai; Daniëlle de Jong; Wai Yi Leung; Christopher D M Fletcher; Pancras C W Hogendoorn Journal: J Pathol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Erin R Rudzinski; James R Anderson; Yueh-Yun Chi; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Caroline Astbury; Frederic G Barr; Stephen X Skapek; Douglas S Hawkins; Brenda J Weigel; Alberto Pappo; William H Meyer; Michael A Arnold; Lisa A Teot; David M Parham Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Jamie M Aye; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; Erin R Rudzinski; Odion T Binitie; Roshni Dasgupta; Suzanne L Wolden; Douglas S Hawkins; Abha A Gupta Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Josephine H Haduong; Christine M Heske; Wendy Allen-Rhoades; Wei Xue; Lisa A Teot; David A Rodeberg; Sarah S Donaldson; Aaron Weiss; Douglas S Hawkins; Rajkumar Venkatramani Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Adepitan A Owosho; Shih-Chiang Huang; Sonja Chen; Shruti Kashikar; Cherry L Estilo; Suzanne L Wolden; Leonard H Wexler; Joseph M Huryn; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Abhijit Chougule; Martin S Taylor; Valentina Nardi; Ivan Chebib; Gregory M Cote; Edwin Choy; G Petur Nielsen; Vikram Deshpande Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Soledad Gallego; Yueh-Yun Chi; Gian Luca De Salvo; Minjie Li; Johannes H M Merks; David A Rodeberg; Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Leo Mascarenhas; Daniel Orbach; Meriel Jenney; Lynn Million; Veronique Minard-Colin; Suzanne Wolden; Ilaria Zanetti; David M Parham; Henry Mandeville; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Gianni Bisogno; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Christine M Heske; Yueh-Yun Chi; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Minjie Li; Michael A Arnold; Roshni Dasgupta; Susan M Hiniker; Douglas S Hawkins; Leo Mascarenhas Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Avanthi Tayi Shah; Tej D Azad; Marcus R Breese; Jacob J Chabon; Emily G Hamilton; Krystal Straessler; David M Kurtz; Stanley G Leung; Aviv Spillinger; Heng-Yi Liu; Inge H Behroozfard; Frederick M Wittber; Florette K Hazard; Soo-Jin Cho; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Kieuhoa T Vo; Arun Rangaswami; Allison Pribnow; Sheri L Spunt; Norman J Lacayo; Maximilian Diehn; Ash A Alizadeh; E Alejandro Sweet-Cordero Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 6.009