Literature DB >> 25989213

Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial.

Sherif A Elkordy1, Amr M Abouelezz2, Mona M Salah Fayed3, Khaled H Attia2, Ramy Abdul Rahman Ishaq4, Yehya A Mostafa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To detect three-dimensionally the effects of using mini-implant anchorage with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 43 skeletal Class II females with deficient mandibles. They were randomly allocated into three groups: 16 patients (13.25 ± 1.12 years) received FFRD alone (Forsus group), 15 subjects (13.07 ± 1.41 years) received FFRD and mini-implants (FMI group), and 12 subjects (12.71 ± 1.44 years) were in the untreated control group. Three-dimensional analyses of cone beam computed tomographic images were completed, and the data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Class I relationship and overjet correction were achieved in 88% of the cases. None of the two treatment groups showed significant mandibular skeletal effects. In the FMI group, significant headgear effect, decrease in maxillary width, and increase in the lower facial height were noted. In the FMI group, retroclination of maxillary incisors and distalization of maxillary molars were significantly higher. Proclination and intrusion of mandibular incisors were significantly greater in the Forsus group.
CONCLUSIONS: FFRD resulted in Class II correction mainly through dentoalveolar effects and with minimal skeletal effects. Utilization of mini-implant anchorage effectively reduced the unfavorable proclination and intrusion of mandibular incisors but did not produce additional skeletal effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anchorage; Class II malocclusion; Fixed functional; Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device; Mini-implants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25989213     DOI: 10.2319/012515-55.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  9 in total

1.  Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance.

Authors:  Hanem Younes Elfeky; Mona Salah Fayed; Maged Sultan Alhammadi; Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman; Dalia Mohamed El Boghdadi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Daniel Jaramillo-Bedoya; Gustavo Villegas-Giraldo; Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez; Diana Milena Ramírez-Ossa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sherif A Elkordy; Amr M Abouelezz; Mona M S Fayed; Mai H Aboulfotouh; Yehya A Mostafa
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment efficiency of activator and skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device appliances.

Authors:  Sinem Ince-Bingol; Burcak Kaya; Burak Bayram; Ayca Arman-Ozcirpici
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A comparison of the effects of Forsus appliances with and without temporary anchorage devices for skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Qi Zhan; Jing Zhou; Qianyun Kuang; Xinyu Yan; Xiaoqi Zhang; Yue Shan; Wenli Lai; Hu Long
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

7.  Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maged S Alhammadi; Amal Abdulsalam A Qasem; Aisha Mohammed S Yamani; Rawan Duhduh A Duhduh; Rahaf T Alshahrani; Esam Halboub; Abeer A Almashraqi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Dentoskeletal effects of the forsus™ fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amal I Linjawi; Mona A Abbassy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-02-15

9.  Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hisham Mohammed; Khaled Wafaie; Mumen Z Rizk; Mohammed Almuzian; Rami Sosly; David R Bearn
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.