Sara Reis Teixeira1, Jorge Elias Junior2, Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa3, Marcos Duarte Guimarães4, Edson Marchiori5, Marcel Koenigkam Santos1. 1. PhD, Attending Physician at Centro de Ciências das Imagens e Física Médica (CCIFM) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. 2. PhD, Associate Professor, Division of Radiology, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. 3. PhD, Professor, Division of Radiology, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. 4. PhD, Attending Physician at Hospital Heliópolis and A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 5. PhD, Full Professor, Division of Radiology, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Abstract
Whole-body imaging in children was classically performed with radiography, positron-emission tomography, either combined or not with computed tomography, the latter with the disadvantage of exposure to ionizing radiation. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in association with the recently developed metabolic and functional techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, has brought the advantage of a comprehensive evaluation of pediatric patients without the risks inherent to ionizing radiation usually present in other conventional imaging methods. It is a rapid and sensitive method, particularly in pediatrics, for detecting and monitoring multifocal lesions in the body as a whole. In pediatrics, it is utilized for both oncologic and non-oncologic indications such as screening and diagnosis of tumors in patients with genetic syndromes, evaluation of disease extent and staging, evaluation of therapeutic response and post-therapy follow-up, evaluation of non neoplastic diseases such as multifocal osteomyelitis, vascular malformations and syndromes affecting multiple regions of the body. The present review was aimed at describing the major indications of whole-body MRI in pediatrics added of technical considerations.
Whole-body imaging in children was classically performed with radiography, positron-emission tomography, either combined or not with computed tomography, the latter with the disadvantage of exposure to ionizing radiation. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in association with the recently developed metabolic and functional techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, has brought the advantage of a comprehensive evaluation of pediatric patients without the risks inherent to ionizing radiation usually present in other conventional imaging methods. It is a rapid and sensitive method, particularly in pediatrics, for detecting and monitoring multifocal lesions in the body as a whole. In pediatrics, it is utilized for both oncologic and non-oncologic indications such as screening and diagnosis of tumors in patients with genetic syndromes, evaluation of disease extent and staging, evaluation of therapeutic response and post-therapy follow-up, evaluation of non neoplastic diseases such as multifocal osteomyelitis, vascular malformations and syndromes affecting multiple regions of the body. The present review was aimed at describing the major indications of whole-body MRI in pediatrics added of technical considerations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diffusion-weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pediatrics; Whole-body MRI
Until recently, whole-body imaging in children was performed only with plain
radiography, scintigraphy and positron-emission tomography (PET), either in combination
or not with computed tomography (CT). However, such imaging methods present the
disadvantage of radiation exposure, particularly for children who are more susceptible
to carcinogenic effects, even with low ionizing radiation doses(.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has increasingly gained relevance in evaluation of
pediatric patients since it does not use ionizing radiation. Additionally, development
of MRI techniques, increase in availability of high-field apparatuses, improvement of
body coils and introduction of new softwares, have reduced scan time and allowed
employment of this tool in whole-body evaluation(.In pediatrics, whole-body MRI (WBMRI) was initially used for staging
lymphomas(, but its use has
currently been expanded for evaluation of other systemic diseases. Besides assessment of
cancer in children, WBMRI stands out in the investigation of inflammatory and/or
infectious processes(, osteonecrosis(, soft tissue lesions such as myositis(,
neurofibromatosis(, vascular
malformations and multiple angiomatoses(, non-accidental
traumas(, body fat
composition( and virtual
autopsy(.WBMRI is performed with rapid sequences usually acquired in one or two planes with a
primary objective of screening, and therefore it is not used to show anatomical details,
differently from an imaging study targeted to a specific body region(. By means of traditional rapid
morphological T1- and T2-weighted images, or inversion recovery sequences such as short
tau inversion-recovery (STIR), in conjunction with functional
techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), one can obtain a whole-body
morphological/functional mapping, providing relevant information on the burden and level
of activity of a determined disease(.The aim of this study is to present an updated review on utilization of WBMRI in
pediatric population.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Even without a global consensus about it, WBMRI is usually performed with acquisition of
one, two, three or more image sets, depending on size of the patient and on region to be
scanned. Subsequently, images are coupled with the aid of specific softwares to form a
whole-body image((Figure 1).
Sometimes, patient's repositioning is required, depending on his/her size and on type of
coil which was used. WBMRI scans should be preferentially performed in highfield (1.5 T
or more) MRI scanners with surface or body coil. Utilization of a gliding tabletop,
tabletop extender, integrated coils( or body surface coil with
spacers( is preferable since
it significantly reduces scan time and necessity of repositioning the patient during
examination. Use of integrated coils provides best signal noise ratio and field
homogeneity allowing for further investigation of a specific region in a single
scan(.
Figure 1
Image acquisition. Re-staging of a 18-year-old boy with lymphoma. STIR block
imaging acquisition (a-f) and coronal single image reformatted using
MRI system's software (Philips. MobiView) (g).
Image acquisition. Re-staging of a 18-year-old boy with lymphoma. STIR block
imaging acquisition (a-f) and coronal single image reformatted using
MRI system's software (Philips. MobiView) (g).Sedation or immobilization of neonates, infants and other non-collaborative patients
should follow local protocols. Patients should be scanned from head to toe, in supine
position, with extended legs and arms aligned along the body (Figure 2). In the case of larger patients, aliasing artifacts might
impair image quality. Thus, it may be necessary to acquire images of upper limbs
positioned above the head and use specific sequences to evaluate the feet( (Figure
2). Cardiac and respiratory gated sequences may be useful to avoid artifacts
resulting from physiological thoracic and abdominal motion(.
Figure 2
Patient positioning. Sixteen year-old girl referred for investigation of
peripheral vascular malformations. Figure a (coronal STIR reformatted
image) shows usual patient positioning with extended legs and arms adjacent to
body. On Figures b (coronal STIR lower limbs section reformatted
image) and c (imaging block showing pelvis) aliasing artifacts were
noted (arrows). Upper limbs (asterisk) had to be positioned above the head for
better image quality (d, post-gadolinium injection angiography).
Patient positioning. Sixteen year-old girl referred for investigation of
peripheral vascular malformations. Figure a (coronal STIR reformatted
image) shows usual patient positioning with extended legs and arms adjacent to
body. On Figures b (coronal STIR lower limbs section reformatted
image) and c (imaging block showing pelvis) aliasing artifacts were
noted (arrows). Upper limbs (asterisk) had to be positioned above the head for
better image quality (d, post-gadolinium injection angiography).Coronal is the preferential acquisition plane for baseline WBMRI, because of faster
acquisition time in addition to more accurate evaluation of long bones. However, coronal
plane has some limitations in evaluation of the thoracic cage, sternum, skull and
vertebral spine(. Moreover, it may
have lower sensitivity as compared with axial plane to detect target lesions(. Therefore, additional sequences
acquired in sagittal plane for spine and feet or axial plane for chest and abdomen may
be necessary, depending on clinical indication.Selection of sequence type is determined by clinical indication and by main target
tissues to be investigated in certain clinical settings. In most centers, baseline
sequences include turbo spin-echo (TSE) T2-weighted sequences with fat saturation or
STIR in coronal plane. STIR technique is preferred because of its greater signal
homogeneity and higher sensitivity for detecting metastatic lesions as compared with
TSE(, due to supression of
the stationary tissue and not only fat tissue(. When needed, TSE T2-weighted sequences are performed in axial
plane, since they are faster than STIR.In order to increase study specificity, TSE T1-weighted sequences should be acquired in
coronal plane. Gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences are faster and might be useful in
diagnosis of metastatic bone marrow lesions, but their sensitivity and contrast
resolution are lower compared to TSE sequences(. Knowledge and familiarization with areas of hematopoietic bone
marrow and fat transformation are extremely important for correct interpretation of
WBMRI or MRI of any region of the body in pediatrics(. In this
context, T1-weighted sequences are essential in evaluation of normal bone marrow
conversion and in differentiation from metastatic lesions(. Some centers use T1-weighted sequence after
intravenous gadolinium injection to evaluate cancer, but this sequence is not routinely
performed as it extends scan time. In addition, its effectiveness in increasing method
accuracy is still to be proved(. However, in examinations requiring
angiographic evaluation, use of intravenous contrast medium is recommended( (Figure
3).
Figure 3
Lower limbs, coronal STIR (a) and magnetic resonance post-gadolinium
angiogram reconstruction (b) of a 14-year-old girl for assessment of
multiple vascular malformations. No fistulas or arteriovenous malformations were
detected on arterial angiogram, confirming hypothesis of low flow vascular
malformations. Diffuse hypersignal from soft tissues is observed, particularly at
right (arrows) and in bone marrow of lower limbs, which was not noticeable at
other imaging methods.
Lower limbs, coronal STIR (a) and magnetic resonance post-gadolinium
angiogram reconstruction (b) of a 14-year-old girl for assessment of
multiple vascular malformations. No fistulas or arteriovenous malformations were
detected on arterial angiogram, confirming hypothesis of low flow vascular
malformations. Diffuse hypersignal from soft tissues is observed, particularly at
right (arrows) and in bone marrow of lower limbs, which was not noticeable at
other imaging methods.Functional sequences like DWI have been increasingly employed in WBMRI. DWI with
single-shot echo-planar imaging (SSh EPI) can provide information on cellularity and
tissue necrosis(. Such sequences
are based on random motion of water molecules through biological tissues leading to
phase dispersion of spins, resulting in signal loss at diffusion-sensitive sequence.
Signal intensity of a studied region can be quantitatively calculated by means of
apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, expressed in square millimeter per second
(mm2/s)(. DWI in association with fat saturation
and acquisition of multiple axial sections with a high number of excitations
(DWIBS)( is currently the
most frequently technique used in WBMRI, and has been object of study in multiple
clinical scenarios( (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Staging of osteoblastic osteosarcoma on left distal femoral diaphysis (asterisk)
in a six-year-old boy. There is proeminent spiculated periosteal reaction (arrow)
at plain radiography, with soft tissue components and diffusion restriction on MRI
(c,d). There are no secondary distant lesions or skip lesions.
a: coronal STIR sequence; b: coronal T1-weighted
sequence; c: coronal DWIBS; d: inverted black-and-white
gray scale DWIBS.
Staging of osteoblastic osteosarcoma on left distal femoral diaphysis (asterisk)
in a six-year-old boy. There is proeminent spiculated periosteal reaction (arrow)
at plain radiography, with soft tissue components and diffusion restriction on MRI
(c,d). There are no secondary distant lesions or skip lesions.
a: coronal STIR sequence; b: coronal T1-weighted
sequence; c: coronal DWIBS; d: inverted black-and-white
gray scale DWIBS.Regardless of clinical indication, WBMRI should be rapid, most accurate as possible and
should not exceed 50 minutes in total duration(. Ideally, scan should be performed with a minimum of sequences -
only one, if possible -, and, in pediatrics, coronal STIR is preferable( (Figure
4).
MAIN WBMRI INDICATIONS IN PEDIATRICS
Pediatric cancer patient
The ability to detect primary or secondary lesions in brain, cervical region,
thoracic and abdominal organs, bone marrow and musculoskeletal system using a single
scan, was one of the factors that propelled development of WBMRI in
pediatrics(. Indications for WBMRI depend on type of neoplasia
and on disease's stage. In several oncological diseases, WBMRI is used on initial
evaluation(,
screening, staging, evaluation of therapeutic response and post-therapy
follow-up(.WBMRI sensitivity is similar to PET/CT in staging of different neoplasias and
superior to other imaging methods such as CT, gallium scintigraphy or bone
scintigraphy, both in evaluation of bone metastases and extraosseous
metastases(. WBMRI has
the capacity to evaluate whole-body bone marrow, detecting neoplastic sites
compromised either by primary tumor or metastasis( (Figure
5).
Figure 5
Staging of abdominal neuroblastoma (asterisks) in 19-month-old boy. There are
multiple bone metastases (arrows) in upper and lower limbs, skull and vertebral
spine. a and d: coronal STIR sequence; b
and c: coronal T1-weighted gradiente-echo sequence;
e: sagittal TSE T2-weighted sequence showing the spine.
Staging of abdominal neuroblastoma (asterisks) in 19-month-old boy. There are
multiple bone metastases (arrows) in upper and lower limbs, skull and vertebral
spine. a and d: coronal STIR sequence; b
and c: coronal T1-weighted gradiente-echo sequence;
e: sagittal TSE T2-weighted sequence showing the spine.WBMRI has a good diagnostic accuracy for evaluation of therapeutic response in cancerpatients(. Increase in ADC value suggests a good response
after chemotherapy or radiotherapy and has already been described for brain tumors,
liver tumors and sarcomas(. In lymphomas, there is a decrease
in tumor volume at morphological sequences and increase in ADC values at DWI
sequences( (Figure
6).
Figure 6
Staging of 17-year-old patient with lymphoma, presenting with enlargement of
multiple cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes (arrows) (a). Note
regression of lymphadenopathy at day 180 following initiation of therapy
(b). a and b: coronal STIR.
Staging of 17-year-old patient with lymphoma, presenting with enlargement of
multiple cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes (arrows) (a). Note
regression of lymphadenopathy at day 180 following initiation of therapy
(b). a and b: coronal STIR.WBMRI can also be used for differentiating between post-treatment fibrosis and viable
tumor(, and for detecting
complications.
Cancer screening in at-risk population
Cancer screening aims to detect cancer before symptoms appear or in early disease
stage when treatment and cure are still possible(. Screening with WBMRI should be applied to a pediatric
population at-risk for developing tumors, like in some hereditary syndromes (e.g.
multiple endocrine neoplasia types I and II, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, family
adenomatous polyposis and Li-Fraumeni syndrome(.
Non-neoplastic multifocal bone and soft-tissue lesions
WBMRI allows for defining lesions distribution pattern, their quantification and
shows the the best site for biopsy.In Langerhans' cell histiocytosis, WBMRI can be used to evaluate extent of bone
compromise and in follow-up of patients, with similar or superior sensitivity,
specificity and accuracy compared to traditional methods, such as bone scintigraphy,
CT, metaiodobenzilguanidine scan and PET/CT(.Also, WBMRI is very useful in diagnosis and follow-up of patients with multifocal
osteomyelitis( (Figure 7) and multifocal osteonecrosis, which
generally is secondary to or occur as a side effect of high chemotherapy doses and
use of corticoids. WBMRI can show multiple lesions in asymptomatic
patients(, allowing for
early treatment and prevention of complications.
Figure 7
Recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in a 8-year-old boy. Multiple focal bone
lesions (arrows) and bone remodelling of the right humerus. Coronal wholebody
STIR MR image.
Recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in a 8-year-old boy. Multiple focal bone
lesions (arrows) and bone remodelling of the right humerus. Coronal wholebody
STIR MR image.In patients at high risk for developing multifocal lesions (post-transplant
disorders, sickle cell diseasepatients, neonates) or in cases of severe infectious
processes, such as necrotizing fasciitis or septic shock in unconscious or sedated
patients whose clinical follow-up is difficult, WBMRI plays an important
role(. In addition to an
accurate assessment of bone lesions, it equally allows for detecting associated
extraosseous lesions, such as septic pulmonary emboli, splenic abscesses and soft
tissue collections(.Even if plain radiography still is the gold standard method in evaluation of
non-accidental trauma, WBMRI can aid specificity in detection of medullary bone
marrow edema, traumatic liver injuries, hemothorax and intracranial extra-axial fluid
collections(.Patients with myopathies (e.g. myositis, polymyositis, dermatopolymyositis and muscle
dystrophies) may also benefit from WBMRI, which can appropriately show disease
distribution pattern, best site for biopsy and help in post-therapy
follow-up(.Follow-up of patients with neurofibromatosis has been studied by several groups,
considering that WBMRI can accurately assess burden of plexiform neurofibromas,
allowing for accurate volumetric calculation( (Figure 8).
Figure 8
Evaluation of neurofibromas' burden in a patient with neurofibromatosis. Edema
(arrowhead) is observed in left lower limb caused by vascular compression of
neurofibromas. a and b: coronal T2-weighted TSE MR
image of the trunk; c and d: coronal STIR MR image of
the lower limbs.
Evaluation of neurofibromas' burden in a patient with neurofibromatosis. Edema
(arrowhead) is observed in left lower limb caused by vascular compression of
neurofibromas. a and b: coronal T2-weighted TSE MR
image of the trunk; c and d: coronal STIR MR image of
the lower limbs.
Vascular malformations
Diffuse vascular malformations (Figure 3), such
as hemangiomatosis and lymphangiomatosis (Figure
9), can be assessed with WBMRI. Considering that such lesions may affect
different compartments, including skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscles and deep tissues
such as thoracic and abdominal organs and bone structures, WBMRI allows for
identification of these lesions, their distribution and sites(. It is an excellent method for
post-therapy evaluation and follow-up in these clinical scenarios(.
Figure 9
Evaluation of bone and visceral involvement in a 3-year-old boy with diffuse
lymphangiomatosis (Gorham's disease). Sagittal plane was most appropriate due
to deformities caused by disease. There is diffuse long bone, spine (arrows)
and soft tissue (asterisks) lesions with hypersignal on T2-weighted and STIR
images. A pathological fracture is noted in left femoral diaphysis (arrowhead).
a: coronal STIR image of left lower limb; b:
whole-body sagittal T2-weighted image.
Evaluation of bone and visceral involvement in a 3-year-old boy with diffuse
lymphangiomatosis (Gorham's disease). Sagittal plane was most appropriate due
to deformities caused by disease. There is diffuse long bone, spine (arrows)
and soft tissue (asterisks) lesions with hypersignal on T2-weighted and STIR
images. A pathological fracture is noted in left femoral diaphysis (arrowhead).
a: coronal STIR image of left lower limb; b:
whole-body sagittal T2-weighted image.
Virtual autopsy
In cases of fetal and neonatal death, autopsies are essential to predict future
risks. WBMRI may be an alternative tool, allowing for less invasive and highly
accurate whole-body evaluation(. However, despite its wide
acceptance and relevance of the information provided by this method, it still cannot
replace traditional autopsy(
(Figure 10).
Figure 10
Virtual autopsy (coronal T2-weighted image) of a 26-week fetus with agenesis of
the corpus callosum. Normal chest and abdomen. Presence of pleural effusion
(arrows) is a normal post-mortem finding. (Image courtesy of Dr. Catherine
Garel, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Paris, France).
Virtual autopsy (coronal T2-weighted image) of a 26-week fetus with agenesis of
the corpus callosum. Normal chest and abdomen. Presence of pleural effusion
(arrows) is a normal post-mortem finding. (Image courtesy of Dr. Catherine
Garel, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Paris, France).
WBMRI LIMITATIONS
WBMRI has some limitations that may difficult its use in pediatric clinical practice.
Long acquisition time required for scan, ranging from 20 to 60 minutes, makes sedation
necessary for a large number of patients, particularly those at lower age ranges.
Artifacts related to respiratory motion, heartbeats and peristaltic motion may degrade
images(. Utilization of rapid
image acquisition techniques with multichannel systems, body coils and parallel imaging
is recommended to minimize occurrence of artifacts(. WBMRI still presents low sensitivity to detect small lesions
< 6 mm at images acquired in coronal plane - the primary imaging plane most
frequently used in WBMRI -, especially pulmonary lesions and lymph nodes(. Therefore, additional sequences in axial plane or DWI may be
necessary, which leads to increase of acquisition time. Caution is required in use of
intravenous paramagnetic contrast agent, since, although small, risk for allergic
reaction is present. Additionally, risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in pediatric
patients should not be ignored(.Interpretation of WBMRI may be difficult and also represent a limiting factor in
pediatrics. Physiological heterogeneity of bone marrow in children poses a problem for
non-experienced radiologists at morphological and functional sequences, in addition to
aliasing, respiratory motion, heartbeats and peristaltic artifacts(.
RECENT ADVANCES
Developments in high-field 3T MRI and body surface coil have brought better spatial
resolution and signal-to-noise ratio, providing better-quality images. Technical
increment and popularization of the method should allow for a gradual replacement of
other conventional methods with WBMRI, especially in the field of oncology(. However, in 3T scanners, there is
increased incidence of magnetic susceptibility artifacts, particularly at
diffusion-weighted sequences. Also, increased specific absorption rate is a limiting
factor for fat suppression sequences(.TRacking Only Navigator echo (TRON) is also a brand new technique developed to reduce
motion artifacts with a slight increase in scan time, but it still requires further
clinical studies to be definitely established in routine protocols(.
CONCLUSION
Despite the lack of standardization in evaluation of multifocal lesions in pediatrics,
WBMRI is among imaging methods of choice for that purpose. It is a method free from
risks of ionizing radiation exposure and it is highly accurate compared to traditional
whole-body imaging methods. Ability to provide morphological and functional information
in a single scan makes this method quite attractive and promising in management of
pediatric patients. However, one must consider that it can not be used for detailed
anatomical evaluation but rather as screening and follow-up modality in evaluation of
multifocal lesions.
Authors: Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Reiji Ochiai; Kazuhiro Katahira; Marc Van Cauteren; Yutaka Imai; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Peter R Luijten Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Dow-Mu Koh; Matthew Blackledge; Anwar R Padhani; Taro Takahara; Thomas C Kwee; Martin O Leach; David J Collins Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Anita Villani; Uri Tabori; Joshua Schiffman; Adam Shlien; Joseph Beyene; Harriet Druker; Ana Novokmet; Jonathan Finlay; David Malkin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sudhin Thayyil; Neil J Sebire; Lyn S Chitty; Angie Wade; Wk Chong; Oystein Olsen; Roxana S Gunny; Amaka C Offiah; Catherine M Owens; Dawn E Saunders; Rosemary J Scott; Rod Jones; Wendy Norman; Shea Addison; Alan Bainbridge; Ernest B Cady; Enrico De Vita; Nicola J Robertson; Andrew M Taylor Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sergio Salerno; Maria Chiara Terranova; Mario Rossello; Maria Piccione; Ottavio Ziino; Giuseppe Lo Re Journal: Mol Clin Oncol Date: 2017-02-17
Authors: Maryam Aghighi; Laura Jean Pisani; Ziyan Sun; Christopher Klenk; Himani Madnawat; Sandra Luna Fineman; Ranjana Advani; Rie Von Eyben; Daniel Owen; Andrew Quon; Michael Moseley; Heike E Daldrup-Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 5.315