Literature DB >> 25987210

Formulating powder-device combinations for salmeterol xinafoate dry powder inhalers.

Mireille Hassoun1, Shirlene Ho1, Joanna Muddle1, Francesca Buttini2, Mark Parry3, Mark Hammond3, Ben Forbes4.   

Abstract

Using salmeterol xinafoate (SX) as an active pharmaceutical ingredient, the effects of carrier lactose particle type, total lactose fines content and device resistance on dry powder inhaler performance were investigated in vitro. To mimic drug levels in commercial preparations, interactive mixtures containing 0.58% w/w SX were prepared by low shear tumble mixing. Three types of milled inhalation grade lactose were used (Lactohale(®) LH 200, Respitose(®) ML006 and ML001) and the concentration of fine lactose (Lactohale(®) 300) added was varied. The in vitro deposition of each mixture was studied using a next generation impactor and inhaler devices exhibiting different resistances, Rotahaler(®)<Aerolizer(®)<Handihaler(®). Aerosol performance was evaluated based on the emitted dose (ED), mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) ± geometric standard deviation (GSD) and fine particle fraction (FPF). Increases of up to eight-fold in FPF were observed with increasing intrinsic fine lactose content. The addition of extra fine lactose increased the FPF further, although the effect diminished as more fines were added. The Aerolizer produced the best aerosol performance with any given powder blend, although suitable formulations were identified for each device as defined by the a priori success criteria: >80% ED and MMAD ± GSD between 1-5 μm. The results confirmed the factors under investigation to be important determinants of product performance, but demonstrated using realistic conditions how individual factor impact may be enhanced or mitigated by inter-dependency.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerolizer; Dry powder inhaler; Handihaler; Lactose; Orally inhaled product (OIP); Rotahaler; Salmeterol xinafoate (SX)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25987210     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  3 in total

1.  Effect of Flow Rate on In Vitro Aerodynamic Performance of NEXThaler(®) in Comparison with Diskus(®) and Turbohaler(®) Dry Powder Inhalers.

Authors:  Francesca Buttini; Gaetano Brambilla; Diego Copelli; Viviana Sisti; Anna Giulia Balducci; Ruggero Bettini; Irene Pasquali
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.849

2.  Manipulation of Spray-Drying Conditions to Develop an Inhalable Ivermectin Dry Powder.

Authors:  Tushar Saha; Shubhra Sinha; Rhodri Harfoot; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu; Shyamal C Das
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.525

3.  Multivariate Analysis of Effects of Asthmatic Patient Respiratory Profiles on the In Vitro Performance of a Reservoir Multidose and a Capsule-Based Dry Powder Inhaler.

Authors:  Francesca Buttini; Irene Pasquali; Gaetano Brambilla; Diego Copelli; Massimiliano Dagli Alberi; Anna Giulia Balducci; Ruggero Bettini; Viviana Sisti
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.200

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.