Literature DB >> 25985966

Practical guide for implementing hybrid PET/MR clinical service: lessons learned from our experience.

Nainesh Parikh1, Kent P Friedman, Shetal N Shah, Hersh Chandarana.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging, until recently, have been performed on separate PET and MR systems with varying temporal delay between the two acquisitions. The interpretation of these two separately acquired studies requires cognitive fusion by radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians or dedicated and challenging post-processing. Recent advances in hardware and software with introduction of hybrid PET/MR systems have made it possible to acquire the PET and MR images simultaneously or near simultaneously. This review article serves as a road-map for clinical implementation of hybrid PET/MR systems and briefly discusses hardware systems, the personnel needs, safety and quality issues, and reimbursement topics based on experience at NYU Langone Medical Center and Cleveland Clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25985966      PMCID: PMC4534342          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0444-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  4 in total

1.  First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses.

Authors:  Alexander Drzezga; Michael Souvatzoglou; Matthias Eiber; Ambros J Beer; Sebastian Fürst; Axel Martinez-Möller; Stephan G Nekolla; Sibylle Ziegler; Carl Ganter; Ernst J Rummeny; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Role of fusion of prone FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts in the evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Linda Moy; Marilyn E Noz; Gerald Q Maguire; Amy Melsaether; Abby E Deans; Antoinette D Murphy-Walcott; Fabio Ponzo
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Clinical impact of PET/MR imaging in patients with cancer undergoing same-day PET/CT: initial experience in 134 patients--a hypothesis-generating exploratory study.

Authors:  Onofrio A Catalano; Bruce R Rosen; Dushyant V Sahani; Peter F Hahn; Alexander R Guimaraes; Mark G Vangel; Emanuele Nicolai; Andrea Soricelli; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Oncologic PET/MRI, part 1: tumors of the brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

Authors:  Christian Buchbender; Till A Heusner; Thomas C Lauenstein; Andreas Bockisch; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 10.057

  4 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality imaging of adult rhabdomyosarcoma: the added value of hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Nicolò Gennaro; Andrea Marrari; Salvatore Lorenzo Renne; Ferdinando Carlo Maria Cananzi; Vittorio Lorenzo Quagliuolo; Lucia Di Brina; Marta Scorsetti; Giovanna Pepe; Arturo Chiti; Armando Santoro; Luca Balzarini; Letterio Salvatore Politi; Alexia Francesca Bertuzzi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  On the potential for RF heating in MRI to affect metabolic rates and 18 FDG signal in PET/MR: simulations of long-duration, maximum normal mode heating.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carluccio; Yu-Shin Ding; Jean Logan; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Joint EANM/SIOPE/RAPNO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of paediatric gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0.

Authors:  Arnoldo Piccardo; Nathalie L Albert; Lise Borgwardt; Frederic H Fahey; Darren Hargrave; Norbert Galldiks; Nina Jehanno; Lars Kurch; Ian Law; Ruth Lim; Egesta Lopci; Lisbeth Marner; Giovanni Morana; Tina Young Poussaint; Victor J Seghers; Barry L Shulkin; Katherine E Warren; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Pietro Zucchetta
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 10.057

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.