Literature DB >> 20443788

Role of fusion of prone FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts in the evaluation of breast cancer.

Linda Moy1, Marilyn E Noz, Gerald Q Maguire, Amy Melsaether, Abby E Deans, Antoinette D Murphy-Walcott, Fabio Ponzo.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to report further about the statistically significant results from a prospective study, which suggests that fusion of prone F-18 Fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) breast scans increases the positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity for patients in whom the MR outcome alone would be nonspecific. Thirty-six women (mean age, 43 years; range, 24-65 years) with 90 lesions detected on MR consented to undergo a FDG-PET scan. Two blinded readers evaluated the MR and the computer tomography (CT) attenuation-corrected prone FDG-PET scans side-by-side, then after the volumes were superimposed (fused). A semiautomatic, landmark-based program was used to perform nonrigid fusion. Pathology and radiologic follow-up were used as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy (with 95% confidence intervals) for MR alone, FDG-PET alone, and fused MR and FDG-PET were calculated. The median lesion size measured from the MR was 2.5 cm (range, 0.5-10 cm). Histologically, 56 lesions were malignant, and 15 were benign. Nineteen lesions were benign after 20-47 months of clinical and radiologic surveillance. The sensitivity of MR alone was 95%, FDG-PET alone was 57%, and fusion was 83%. The increase in PPV from 77% in MR alone to 98% when fused and the increase in specificity from 53% to 97% were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The false-negative rate on FDG-PET alone was 26.7%, and after fusion this number was reduced to 9%. FDG-PET and MR fusions were helpful in selecting which lesion to biopsy, especially in women with multiple suspicious MR breast lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443788     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00927.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  21 in total

1.  MRI fused with prone FDG PET/CT improves the primary tumour staging of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria J Garcia-Velloso; Maria J Ribelles; Macarena Rodriguez; Alejandro Fernandez-Montero; Lidia Sancho; Elena Prieto; Marta Santisteban; Natalia Rodriguez-Spiteri; Miguel A Idoate; Fernando Martinez-Regueira; Arlette Elizalde; Luis J Pina
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measuring Glucose Uptake in Primary Invasive Breast Cancer Using Simultaneous Time-of-Flight Breast PET/MRI: A Method Comparison Study with Prone PET/CT.

Authors:  Amy M Fowler; Manoj Kumar; Leah Henze Bancroft; Kelley Salem; Jacob M Johnson; Jillian Karow; Scott B Perlman; Tyler J Bradshaw; Samuel A Hurley; Alan B McMillan; Roberta M Strigel
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 3.  Potential Clinical Applications of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Mammography in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ihn-Ho Cho; Eun-Jung Kong
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-30

4.  Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.

Authors:  Jason M Williams; Sudheer D Rani; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Tzu-Cheng Lee; Lawrence R MacDonald; Savannah C Partridge; Hakmook Kang; Jennifer G Whisenant; Richard G Abramson; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Clinical PET-MR Imaging in Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Samuel L Rice; Kent P Friedman
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2016-10

Review 6.  Practical guide for implementing hybrid PET/MR clinical service: lessons learned from our experience.

Authors:  Nainesh Parikh; Kent P Friedman; Shetal N Shah; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Assessment of Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer Using Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET and DCE-MRI: Preliminary Observation.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Margolis; Linda Moy; Eric E Sigmund; Melanie Freed; Jason McKellop; Amy N Melsaether; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Amy N Melsaether; Roy A Raad; Akshat C Pujara; Fabio D Ponzo; Kristine M Pysarenko; Komal Jhaveri; James S Babb; Eric E Sigmund; Sungheon G Kim; Linda A Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI in breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Seock-Ah Im; Gi Jeong Cheon; In-Ae Park; Kyung-Hun Lee; Tae-Yong Kim; Young Seon Kim; Bo Ra Kwon; Jung Min Lee; Hoon Young Suh; Koung Jin Suh
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.