Literature DB >> 25985372

A Longitudinal Review of Gait Following Treatment for Idiopathic Clubfoot: Gait Analysis at 2 and 5 Years of Age.

Kelly A Jeans1, Ashley L Erdman, Chan-Hee Jo, Lori A Karol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial correction following nonoperative (NonOp) treatment for idiopathic clubfoot has been reported in 95% of feet by age 2; however, by age 4, approximately one third of feet undergo surgery due to relapse. The purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal effect of growth and surgical (Sx) intervention on gait following NonOp and Sx treatment for clubfoot.
METHODS: Children with idiopathic clubfoot were seen for gait analysis at 2 and 5 years of age. Kinematic data were collected at both visits, and kinetic data were collected at age 5 years. Group comparisons were made between feet treated with the Ponseti casting technique (Ponseti) and the French physical therapy method (PT) and between feet treated nonoperatively and surgically. Comparisons were made between feet treated with a limited release or tendon transfer (fair) and those treated with a full posteromedial release (poor). The α was set to 0.05 for all statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Gait data from 181 children with 276 idiopathic clubfeet were collected at both age 2 and 5 years. Each foot was initially treated with either the Ponseti (n=132) or PT (n=144) method but by the 5-year visit, 30 Ponseti and 61 PT feet required surgery. Gait outcomes showed limitations primarily in the Sx clubfeet. Normal ankle motion was only present in 17% of Ponseti and 21% of PT feet by age 5 following Sx management. Sx PT feet showed persistent intoeing at age 2 and 5. Within the Sx group, feet initially treated with PT had a clinically significant reduction in ankle power compared with those treated initially by the Ponseti method. Feet treated with posteromedial releases had significantly less ankle power than those treated with limited surgery or that remained NonOp at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study shows subtle changes between 2 and 5 years, and continues to support a NonOp approach in the treatment of clubfoot. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-therapeutic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25985372     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  6 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of children with a surgically treated clubfoot: Assessing the multi-segment-foot motions, dynamic plantar pressures, and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Xue-Cheng Liu; John Thometz; Jonathan Campbell; Channing Tassone
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-12-30

2.  Foot function during gait and parental perceived outcome in older children with symptomatic club foot deformity.

Authors:  Jennifer Leigh McCahill; Julie Stebbins; Jaap Harlaar; Robin Prescott; Tim Theologis; Christopher Lavy
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-11-02

Review 3.  Clinical examination and classification systems of congenital clubfoot: a narrative review.

Authors:  Federico Canavese; Alain Dimeglio
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

4.  Plantar Pressure Distribution of Right and Left Foot in Bilateral Clubfoot Treated by Ponseti Method: A Correlation Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Chao Xu; Yong-Gang Zhu; Ya-Bo Yan; Lu-Yu Huang; Wei Lei
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-22

5.  Gait in 5-year-old children with idiopathic clubfoot: A cohort study of 59 children, focusing on foot involvement and the contralateral foot.

Authors:  Elin Lööf; Hanneke Andriesse; Marie André; Stephanie Böhm; Eva W Broström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Functional Assessment of the Foot Undergoing Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy in Term of Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Bin Liu; Shu-Yun Jiang; Li Zhao; Yan Yu; Xu-Chen Tao; Da-Hang Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.