| Literature DB >> 25985309 |
Lingling Cao1,2, Jianrong Zeng3, Ke Liu4,5, Liangman Bao6, Yan Li7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential impact of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), which is an anthropogenic source of aerosol emissions, is of great public health concern. This study investigated the characterization and cytotoxic effects of ambient ultrafine particles (PM<0.2), fine particles (PM0.2-2.5) and coarse particles (PM2.5-10) collected around a municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) plant in the Pudong district of Shanghai.Entities:
Keywords: Fine particles; ROS generation; coarse particles; cytotoxicity; metallic elements; ultrafine particles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25985309 PMCID: PMC4454955 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120505076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The concentration distribution of particulate matter (PM) from the municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) calculated by AERMOD (atmospheric dispersion modeling) (prevailing wind direction: east, average wind speed: 3.4 m/s and temperature: 21 °C) and the location of the sampling site.
Figure 2Average mass concentrations (μg/m3) of the 13-size particles of PM samples around MSWI.
Average (± standard error) mass concentrations (ng/m3) and EFs of metallic elements in ultrafine, fine, coarse particles.
| Element | Ultrafine Particles | Fine Particles | Coarse Particles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass Concentrations | EFs | Mass Concentrations | EFs | Mass Concentrations | EFs | |
| 37.72 ± 13.31 | 5.8 | 304.25 ± 118.55 | 8.2 | 244.85 ± 125.48 | 4.4 | |
| 13.57 ± 12.53 | 2.7 | 84.08 ± 17.99 | 2.9 | 108.83 ± 48.15 | 2.5 | |
| 39.65 ± 9.87 | 1.0 | 226.43 ± 108.59 | 1.0 | 355.61 ± 302.19 | 1.0 | |
| 64.79 ± 40.44 | 6.5 | 575.99 ± 393.89 | 10.2 | 124.72 ± 83.65 | 1.4 | |
| 8.57 ± 2.95 | 3.5 | 25.65 ± 10.24 | 1.8 | 36.39 ± 21.12 | 1.7 | |
| 1.98 ± 0.44 | 39.1 | 11.41 ± 3.79 | 39.4 | 1.03 ± 0.75 | 2.3 | |
| 6.88 ± 1.24 | 173.6 | 13.97 ± 2.86 | 61.7 | 11.96 ± 5.88 | 31.7 | |
| 1.82 ± 0.31 | 5.9 | 21.41 ± 9.15 | 12.1 | 8.15 ± 6.20 | 3.0 | |
| 81.43 ± 26.40 | 4.6 | 343.50 ± 148.34 | 3.4 | 319.15 ± 249.92 | 2.0 | |
| 2.61 ± 0.64 | 154.9 | 13.87 ± 8.78 | 143.8 | 6.78 ± 5.61 | 45.4 | |
| 1.45 ± 0.42 | 94.5 | 8.02 ± 3.68 | 91.4 | 2.32 ± 1.34 | 17.5 | |
| 10.29 ± 2.90 | 224.1 | 89.16 ± 30.11 | 340.0 | 10.87 ± 4.43 | 25.3 | |
| 0.03 ± 0.04 | 390.9 | 0.35 ± 0.21 | 790.8 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 10.5 | |
| 3.19 ± 1.43 | 225.8 | 35.25 ± 21.85 | 437.1 | 3.02 ± 2.38 | 32.6 | |
Figure 3The mass ratios of the metallic elements in the coarse particles (blue), fine particles (red) and ultrafine particles (green).
Figure 4Viability of PM with different sizes to A549 cells after 6 h exposure (p < 0.05).
Figure 5(A) LSCM (Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope) images and (B) intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels of A549 cells with PM samples (ultrafine, fine and coarse particles).