Literature DB >> 16895376

Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm.

Tian Xia1, Michael Kovochich, Jonathan Brant, Matt Hotze, Joan Sempf, Terry Oberley, Constantinos Sioutas, Joanne I Yeh, Mark R Wiesner, Andre E Nel.   

Abstract

Nanomaterial properties differ from those bulk materials of the same composition, allowing them to execute novel activities. A possible downside of these capabilities is harmful interactions with biological systems, with the potential to generate toxicity. An approach to assess the safety of nanomaterials is urgently required. We compared the cellular effects of ambient ultrafine particles with manufactured titanium dioxide (TiO2), carbon black, fullerol, and polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles (NPs). The study was conducted in a phagocytic cell line (RAW 264.7) that is representative of a lung target for NPs. Physicochemical characterization of the NPs showed a dramatic change in their state of aggregation, dispersibility, and charge during transfer from a buffered aqueous solution to cell culture medium. Particles differed with respect to cellular uptake, subcellular localization, and ability to catalyze the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under biotic and abiotic conditions. Spontaneous ROS production was compared by using an ROS quencher (furfuryl alcohol) as well as an NADPH peroxidase bioelectrode platform. Among the particles tested, ambient ultrafine particles (UFPs) and cationic PS nanospheres were capable of inducing cellular ROS production, GSH depletion, and toxic oxidative stress. This toxicity involves mitochondrial injury through increased calcium uptake and structural organellar damage. Although active under abiotic conditions, TiO2 and fullerol did not induce toxic oxidative stress. While increased TNF-alpha production could be seen to accompany UFP-induced oxidant injury, cationic PS nanospheres induced mitochondrial damage and cell death without inflammation. In summary, we demonstrate that ROS generation and oxidative stress are a valid test paradigm to compare NP toxicity. Although not all materials have electronic configurations or surface properties to allow spontaneous ROS generation, particle interactions with cellular components are capable of generating oxidative stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895376     DOI: 10.1021/nl061025k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


  324 in total

1.  Nrf2-regulated phase II enzymes are induced by chronic ambient nanoparticle exposure in young mice with age-related impairments.

Authors:  Hongqiao Zhang; Honglei Liu; Kelvin J A Davies; Constantinos Sioutas; Caleb E Finch; Todd E Morgan; Henry Jay Forman
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Computer simulation of the translocation of nanoparticles with different shapes across a lipid bilayer.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Yu-Qiang Ma
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Nanoparticle-induced unfolding of fibrinogen promotes Mac-1 receptor activation and inflammation.

Authors:  Zhou J Deng; Mingtao Liang; Michael Monteiro; Istvan Toth; Rodney F Minchin
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  A multifunctional mesothelin antibody-tagged microparticle targets human mesotheliomas.

Authors:  Sherrill L Macura; Jedd M Hillegass; Jeremy L Steinbacher; Maximilian B MacPherson; Arti Shukla; Stacie L Beuschel; Timothy N Perkins; Kelly J Butnor; Melissa J Lathrop; Mutlay Sayan; Khan Hekmatyar; Douglas J Taatjes; Risto A Kauppinen; Christopher C Landry; Brooke T Mossman
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  The fate of ZnO nanoparticles administered to human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Benjamin Gilbert; Sirine C Fakra; Tian Xia; Suman Pokhrel; Lutz Mädler; André E Nel
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles activate the ATM-Chk2 DNA damage response in human dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Raju Y Prasad; Paul D Chastain; Nana Nikolaishvili-Feinberg; Lisa Smeester; William K Kaufmann; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 7.  Immunotoxicological impact of occupational and environmental nanoparticles exposure: The influence of physical, chemical, and combined characteristics of the particles.

Authors:  Paola Pedata; Claudia Petrarca; Elpidio Maria Garzillo; Mario Di Gioacchino
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.219

8.  Hydroxylated Fullerene: A Stellar Nanomedicine to Treat Lumbar Radiculopathy via Antagonizing TNF-α-Induced Ion Channel Activation, Calcium Signaling, and Neuropeptide Production.

Authors:  Li Xiao; Kwangseok Hong; Charles Roberson; Mengmeng Ding; Andrew Fernandez; Francis Shen; Li Jin; Swapnil Sonkusare; Xudong Li
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-12-07

9.  Acute toxicity and prothrombotic effects of quantum dots: impact of surface charge.

Authors:  Jorina Geys; Abderrahim Nemmar; Erik Verbeken; Erik Smolders; Monica Ratoi; Marc F Hoylaerts; Benoit Nemery; Peter H M Hoet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Nanoparticles, lung injury, and the role of oxidant stress.

Authors:  Amy K Madl; Laurel E Plummer; Christopher Carosino; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 19.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.